Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Digpim Assessment 2010: Blog

    Uploaded by

    api-25902487
    13 views1 page
    This document outlines criteria for assessing a DIGPIM project, including evidence of appropriate research (20%), a clear production and ideas process blog (30%), evidence of evaluation of subject matter (20%), and a final presentation of photographs suitable for display (30%). The assessment covers research citations, idea development documentation, subject analysis, production workflows, software use, quality of work, and presentation layout. An overall mark is provided.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    null

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document outlines criteria for assessing a DIGPIM project, including evidence of appropriate research (20%), a clear production and ideas process blog (30%), evidence of evaluation of subject matter (20%), and a final presentation of photographs suitable for display (30%). The assessment covers research citations, idea development documentation, subject analysis, production workflows, software use, quality of work, and presentation layout. An overall mark is provided.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    13 views1 page

    Digpim Assessment 2010: Blog

    Uploaded by

    api-25902487
    This document outlines criteria for assessing a DIGPIM project, including evidence of appropriate research (20%), a clear production and ideas process blog (30%), evidence of evaluation of subject matter (20%), and a final presentation of photographs suitable for display (30%). The assessment covers research citations, idea development documentation, subject analysis, production workflows, software use, quality of work, and presentation layout. An overall mark is provided.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    DIGPIM ASSESSMENT 2010

    NAME

    • Is there evidence of appropriate RESEARCH? (20%)

    References / URL’S / Credits for inspiration / Subject category research / Presentation of


    research

    • BLOG - Is the Production / Ideas Process clear? (30%)

    Screengrabs (video and/or still) / Idea Process / Planning / Editing / Subject Analysis &
    Feedback / Mini Task Production & Processes x 6 / Software Use / Use of blog to present
    these effectively

    • Is there evidence of evaluation?(20%)

    Have you described your subjects processes clearly and concisely ? / Have you considered
    and examined the merits and problems of the subjects? /Have you evaluated your subject
    matter and included what you would do differently?

    • Is the Final presentation of Photographs suitable for display as a showcase?


    (30%)

    Quality of work / Relevance / Advertising / Feedback Mechanism / Display options and


    presentation of work / Flow

    OVERALL MARK

    Claire Sambrook / Gary Bown 2010

    You might also like