Professional Documents
Culture Documents
الاساءة الوالدية
الاساءة الوالدية
2013/9/12
**
2014/2/6
:
. )
(
575
.
.
.
) . :
(.
:
(Atkinson
).& Hornboy, 2002
) Donping,
(2009; Gurgs, 2010
.
) (2009
)
.(2011
(Child Abuse prevention and treatment
).Act,2000
_________________________
* .
* .
.
205
)2011
(2012
.
:
) (Snow, 1998 :
) (Girgus; 2010 :
.1
.
: : :
.
.2
.
: :
.
.3
.
: :
.
.
) .(2011
) .(Butany, Pelcovits, & Kaplan, 2011
) (2009
.
) (
).(2006
: :
.
) (2012
)11-10
( ) 9-8(
.
).(2004
) (2010
.
) (22
) (81
.
) (2010 480
18- 11
) (
.
.
206
.
)(Esteban, 2006 )
2012 (2012
.
-
) .(Naz & Cansar, 2012
).(Cankaya,Talbot, Ward, & Duberstien, 2012).
) (2011
536
17- 12 .
:
-1
-2
-3
-4
-5
.
.
) 2012 2011
(2003
.
:
:
:
.1
.
.2
.
.
.3
.
.4
.
207
:
.1
.2
.3
.4
:
) (750
) (
) (25
)(167
)(575
).(1
:1
277
48.2
298
51.8
14
363
63.1
15
212
36.9
299
166
28.9
300
409
71.1
246
42.8
72
12.5
69
12.0
188
32.7
575
100.0
.
22
132
.
.
:
:
-
:
:
) (48
) .(1999 22
:
.1
) (10
208
( ) (0.91 0.87
).(0.88
%80
26 ) (22
) (1
) =
1 = 2 = 3 = 4 = 5
= (6 . 22
:
) (13 7 2 1
)(20 19 15 14 12 9 8 4 3
).(22 21 18 17 16 10 6 5
) : 2.67(
) 4.34 - 2.68( ) 4.35 (.
- :
) (2004 ) (37
) :
(
: = 5= 4 =3
= 2 = .1 .
185 37
.
.2 :
) (0.86 0.78
) (0.96 0.88
.
:
.1
)(10
%80 .
:
.1 :
-
) (90 .
) (0.90 0.85
) .(0.95
) (0.87 -0.89
).(0.93
)(0.59 0.32
).(0.82 - 0.70
.2 :
.2
-
) (90 .
) (
) (0.89 0.85 )(.(0.87
)
:
.1
) (
) 0.75
(0.81
).(0.89
209
.2
)(
) (90
.
) (0.88 0.84
).(0.86
) : 2.33
( ) 3.67 2.34 () 3.68
(.
.
) (SPSS
.
) (2 ) (3 .
.
.
:2
1.771
0.92
1.902
1.10
1.650
1.02
1.797
0.95
:3
1.810
0.96
1.719
0.87
1.438
0.72
1.701
0.82
) (2) (3
:
) (
.
.
210
)(2004
) (2010
) (
)(2003
:
) (4 .
:4
14
15
299
300
2.067
1.04
1.546
0.76
1.686
0.81
1.988
1.12
1.965
1.10
1.729
0.87
1.761
0.86
1.911
1.05
1.707
0.90
1.834
1.02
) (4
).(5
:5
34.223
34.223
42.337
0.000
5.263
5.263
6.511
0.011
5.480
5.480
6.779
0.009
2.189
0.730
0.903
0.440
459.139
568
0.808
512.957
574
) (5
.
.
) (2010
)(2011
.
) (2009
) (2010
. )
:2012 2012 Al-
(fayz, Ohaeri, & Godo, 2012
211
.
) (2004
.
) & Al-fayz, Ohaeri,
.(Godo, 2012
.
.
) (5
.
.
).(2012
) (6 :
) (5
:6
14
15
299
300
1.990
2.19
1.995
1.172
1.20
1.006
1.335
1.63
1.563
0.737
0.92
0.771
1.539
0.859
1.841
1.236
1.78
0.96
2.11
1.28
1.669
0.800
1.947
1.068
1.759
2.11
1.934
1.176
1.30
1.049
1.606
1.82
1.706
0.953
1.00
0.850
1.672
1.86
1.717
0.991
1.00
0.823
1.691
2.03
1.904
1.061
1.27
1.000
1.518
1.77
1.732
0.973
0.98
0.904
1.656
1.96
1.806
1.073
1.20
1.001
212
:7
55.125
4.505
2.982
1.968
530.038
601.862
40.399
6.104
8.123
3.279
628.480
694.600
23.188
1
1
1
3
568
574
1
1
1
3
568
574
1
55.125
4.505
2.982
0.656
0.933
59.073
4.828
3.195
0.703
0.000
0.028
0.074
0.551
40.399
6.104
8.123
1.093
1.106
36.511
5.516
7.341
0.988
0.000
0.019
0.007
0.398
23.188
29.818
0.000
4.935
4.935
6.347
0.012
4.750
4.750
6.108
0.014
2.229
0.743
0.955
0.414
441.698
568
0.778
482.312
574
.
.
. )
2010 2012
2012 (Naz, & Kausar, 2012
).(2011
) (6
) (7 .
) (7
15
15 .
) (8 :
:8
14
15
299
300
1.915
0.88
1.502
0.70
1.647
0.75
1.794
0.93
1.709
0.86
1.698
0.81
1.753
0.83
1.723
0.86
1.638
0.73
1.647
0.83
213
) (8
.
).(9
:9
528.587
574
22.806
22.806
31.626
0.000
0.612
0.612
0.848
0.357
0.185
0.185
0.256
0.613
9.574
9.574
18.902
0.000
0.937
0.937
1.849
0.174
0.114
0.114
0.224
0.636
0.487
0.162
0.321
0.810
287.687
568
0.506
300.215
574
27.735
27.735
32.009
0.000
1.817
1.817
2.096
0.148
0.765
0.765
0.883
0.348
2.759
0.920
1.061
0.365
492.162
568
0.866
1.164
0.388
409.597
568
0.721
436.943
574
) (9
) (
.
.
0.538
0.656
.
)2010
2012 2012 Naz, & Kausar,
(2012 ).(2011
:
).(10
:10
3.833
0.81
4.094
0.73
3.605
0.60
3.515
0.74
3.752
0.55
214
) (10
.
:
.
) (7-5
) ( .
.
.
:
:
) (11 :
:11
14
15
299
3.716
0.58
3.785
0.51
3.855
0.50
3.575
0.58
3.613
0.59
300
3.808
0.52
3.824
0.54
3.690
0.49
3.822
0.52
3.655
0.59
) (11
).(12
:12
0.252
0.252
0.902
0.343
7.971
7.971
28.565
0.000
1.737
1.737
6.224
0.013
1.375
0.458
1.642
0.179
158.503
568
0.279
173.464
574
) (12
.
.
.
)
( ).(13
215
:13
3.564
3.55
4.013
3.78
0.775
0.61
0.759
0.86
3.470
3.66
4.170
3.88
0.700
0.59
0.700
0.77
3.651
0.693
3.282
0.756
3.66
0.59
3.51
0.62
4.203
0.672
3.909
0.795
3.96
0.76
3.62
0.85
3.403
3.46
3.949
3.69
0.806
0.64
0.772
0.85
3.561
3.67
4.153
3.89
0.705
0.58
0.709
0.79
3.591
3.70
4.141
3.90
0.707
0.57
0.689
0.81
3.471
3.55
3.983
3.80
14
15
299
300
0.686
0.55
0.755
0.74
3.628
3.58
4.262
3.88
0.732
0.58
0.651
0.74
3.391
3.52
4.015
3.74
0.785
0.66
0.795
0.86
) (13
.
).(14
:14
2.520
2.520
4.964
0.026
17.326
17.326
34.136
0.000
0.371
0.371
0.731
0.393
1.932
0.644
1.269
0.284
288.286
568
0.508
312.679
574
1.500
1.500
4.267
0.039
1.484
1.484
4.224
0.040
2.440
2.440
6.944
0.009
1.427
0.476
1.354
0.256
199.613
568
0.351
209.646
574
2.304
2.304
4.543
0.033
7.977
7.977
15.730
0.000
2.863
2.863
5.645
0.018
3.323
1.108
2.184
0.089
288.041
568
0.507
308.360
574
0.510
216
0.510
0.809
0.369
12.409
12.409
19.667
0.000
1.845
1.845
2.925
0.088
0.825
0.275
0.436
0.728
358.365
568
0.631
378.472
574
) (14
) (
) ( .
.
.
. )(2009
.
:
)-
(0.65
) (0.59-
) & Butany, Pelcovits,
(Kaplan,2011
)
(2011 )(2009
) (2010 )
(2011
) :2012 .(2012
& (Naz & Kausar, 2012; Cankaua, Talbot, Ward,
).Duberstien ,2012
) (14
.
.
) (14
) (
) ( .
) (2004
.
:
:
217
.
).(2012
:
.(2009) .
.
.253
.
.242 218 (26) 2
.(2011) . :
.(2006) .
:
.
.(2003) .
.(2011) .
. .101- 90 .
.(2009) .
: .
.(2004) .
.(2010) .
.
.
.
.
) (2011
.
.238 237
.(1999) .
. .
.
.(2010) .
) .(17 11
. .
.(2004) .
.
.(2012) .
) 15 9( .
.96- 90 .
.(2012) .
) 18 15( .
.101 97 .
218