Assessment Feedback

Summative Formative

Student Name Student ID

Foundation Degree (Science) Broadcast
Programme Level 2
Media Technology
Project Title Project Value
Unit Title Group Project Unit Code BMT201/FDC201
Project Leader Unit Leader

Assessment Criteria Indicative Grading

Excellent V Good Good Satisfactory Basic Fail N/A
RoA Submission
1 Meets the technical requirements of the media industries;
(LO2)
2 Quality in terms of form and content of productions; (LO2)
3 Demonstrates confident operation of the technologies in its
production; (LO1)
4 Effectively balances the creative, technical and budgetary
demands. (LO3)
Contribution to Group Log
5 Evidence of effective teamwork in an inter-disciplinary
environment; (LO4)
6 Evidence that students independently manage their time
(within their role) in order to deliver work to a deadline.
(LO5)
Self Evaluation
7 Reflection on the students personal role and contribution to
the group; (LO4, LO5, LO6)
8 Appropriate use of vocabulary and inter-personal skills to
communicate with team members from other disciplines;
(LO6)
9 An understanding of the importance of working as part of a
team. (LO4)
Note 1 - Unless specified in the Project Brief it is assumed that all assessment criteria are equally weighted

Overall comment including strengths and areas for improvement

 Assessment Feedback
Grade Banding Brief Grade Descriptor
A+ 90-100 High Excellent all round work or outstanding
A 80-89 Medium performance Grade (where appropriate)
A- 70-79 Low
B+ 67-69 High High level achievement or very good level of
B 64-66 Medium performance
B- 60-63 Low
C+ 57-59 High Good level of achievement or proficient
C 54-56 Medium performance
C- 50-53 Low
D+ 47-49 High Satisfactory level of achievement or competent
D 44-46 Medium performance
D- 40-43 Low
E 35-39 Marginal Elementary achievement or basic level of Note 2 - All summative grades are subject to ratification by the Examination Board
Pass performance
F+ 30-34 Marginal Does not achieve the learning outcomes but
Fail may be some element of understanding or Please contact your Unit Leader about retrieval
competence arrangements (where appropriate)
Assessor(s)
F < 30 Name:
Fail No evidence of achievement or competence
F- > 10 Poor Fail
0 0 no submission or special circumstances

Student signature: Date sent to student: