The Supreme Court ruled that while Section 103 of PD No. 1455 generally makes public officers personally liable for unauthorized disbursements of government funds, prevailing jurisprudence provides an exception for disallowed salaries, benefits, and allowances received by government employees and officials in good faith. Specifically, recipients need not refund disallowed amounts received in good faith, while officers who approved the disallowed amounts must refund them only if found to have acted in bad faith or with gross negligence amounting to bad faith.
The Supreme Court ruled that while Section 103 of PD No. 1455 generally makes public officers personally liable for unauthorized disbursements of government funds, prevailing jurisprudence provides an exception for disallowed salaries, benefits, and allowances received by government employees and officials in good faith. Specifically, recipients need not refund disallowed amounts received in good faith, while officers who approved the disallowed amounts must refund them only if found to have acted in bad faith or with gross negligence amounting to bad faith.
The Supreme Court ruled that while Section 103 of PD No. 1455 generally makes public officers personally liable for unauthorized disbursements of government funds, prevailing jurisprudence provides an exception for disallowed salaries, benefits, and allowances received by government employees and officials in good faith. Specifically, recipients need not refund disallowed amounts received in good faith, while officers who approved the disallowed amounts must refund them only if found to have acted in bad faith or with gross negligence amounting to bad faith.
ISSUE: In case of disallowance, who should be liable to refund the amounts released? RULING: Section 103 of PD No. 1455 provides for a general liability for unlawful expenditures. Expenditures of government funds or uses of government property in violation of law or regulations shall be a personal liability of the official or employee found to be directly responsible therefor. Generally, the public officers good faith does not excuse his or her personal liability over the unauthorized disbursement. However, with regard to the disallowance of salaries, emoluments, benefits, and allowances of government employees, prevailing jurisprudence provides that recipients or payees need not refund these disallowed amounts when they received these in good faith. Government officials and employees who received benefits or allowances, which were disallowed, may keep the amounts received if there is no finding of bad faith and the disbursement was made in good faith. On the other hand, officers who participated in the approval of the disallowed allowances or benefits are required to refund only the amounts received when they are found to be in bad faith or grossly negligent amounting to bad faith.