Comparison: Expandable Cavity vs Slides

Instructions:
1) Fill in all grey boxes (expect those marked optional) for a typical slide mold application.
2) Estimates have been provided but can be replaced with your input.
3) Review Savings Summary at bottom and contact Progressive / Roehr with questions.
* This is NOT a quote. Designs can be submitted to Roehr Tool at information@roehrtool.com or call 978-562-4488.
* For animations or more information, please visit http://www.roehrtool.com/Demo/.
Project Overview:
Customer Name:
Project Description:
Date:
Slides vs Ex-Cav
Part/Project Data:

Production Data:

Part OD (in):
Resin Type:
Part Cost Est ($):
Annual Volume:
Expected Life of Mold (yrs):

Run Hours/Day=
Run Days/Year=
Press Rate:
Toolroom Rate:
Productivity Est:

Mold Data:
Cavities:
Slide Cost/Cavity:
Ex-Cav Cost (optional):
# of Columns in Mold Design:

Stops from; trapped parts, slide

maintenance, grease on parts, etc

20
300
$50
$50
90%
# /Year

Downtime/Stop (hr)

$2,500
2

Smaller Press ($ Less):

Secondary Operation Cost (optional):

$5

Cycle Time:
Est Cycle Time of Slide Mold
Actual Ex-Cav Cycle Time (optional):

Quality, Part Rejects:

Part damage, contamination, etc

Savings Summary:
Notes;
Cycle Time Reduction (sec) =
Mold Capacity: ExCav (units)=
Increased Capacity =
Smaller Mold Base (in) =
Mold Cost Variance =
Annual Savings;
Smaller Press Req, Savings =
TOTAL Part Savings =
TOTAL Maintenance Savings=
TOTAL Secondary Ops Savings =
Savings (year 1)
Savings (years 2, 3, etc)
TOTAL Savings over Life of Mold
ROI (yrs)

=
=
=
=

$/hr
$/hr

0.0
#DIV/0!
8
$0

#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
$2,004
$0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!

% Rejects
0.5%

$/hr
% of part cost