This memorandum provides campaign recommendations for Candidate Smith. It analyzes the 2012 presidential campaigns of Obama and Romney to identify successful strategies. Specifically, it recommends (1) being cautious about public statements since opponents could use them against the candidate, (2) targeting messaging at demographic groups in swing states like Colorado and Florida, and (3) heavily investing in digital media campaigns as Obama did in 2012 which helped lead to his reelection. Analyzing previous campaigns can provide valuable lessons on effective campaign tactics.
This memorandum provides campaign recommendations for Candidate Smith. It analyzes the 2012 presidential campaigns of Obama and Romney to identify successful strategies. Specifically, it recommends (1) being cautious about public statements since opponents could use them against the candidate, (2) targeting messaging at demographic groups in swing states like Colorado and Florida, and (3) heavily investing in digital media campaigns as Obama did in 2012 which helped lead to his reelection. Analyzing previous campaigns can provide valuable lessons on effective campaign tactics.
This memorandum provides campaign recommendations for Candidate Smith. It analyzes the 2012 presidential campaigns of Obama and Romney to identify successful strategies. Specifically, it recommends (1) being cautious about public statements since opponents could use them against the candidate, (2) targeting messaging at demographic groups in swing states like Colorado and Florida, and (3) heavily investing in digital media campaigns as Obama did in 2012 which helped lead to his reelection. Analyzing previous campaigns can provide valuable lessons on effective campaign tactics.
This memorandum provides campaign recommendations for Candidate Smith. It analyzes the 2012 presidential campaigns of Obama and Romney to identify successful strategies. Specifically, it recommends (1) being cautious about public statements since opponents could use them against the candidate, (2) targeting messaging at demographic groups in swing states like Colorado and Florida, and (3) heavily investing in digital media campaigns as Obama did in 2012 which helped lead to his reelection. Analyzing previous campaigns can provide valuable lessons on effective campaign tactics.
From: Estefani Vargas, Campaign Consultant Date: February 14, 2016 Re: Campaign Recommendations Analyzing Campaigns The 2016 presidential election is not something that can be clearly predicted. By analyzing what makes a candidate succeed, one can draw out valuable information like on what works and what does not. For instance, comparing the 2012 presidential election campaigns of Obama and Romney can be valuable in helping understand what makes a candidate such as Obama so successful. More specifically, analyzing the media campaigns, and the demographics/political structure of swing states can bring greater insight as to what can be done to have a campaign with a great outcome. Things you should know about media Analyzing the entire 2012 presidential election, it is clear that it is Obama and Romney who are the campaign main front runners. Candidly, the tactics used in media campaigns of both candidates are what helped both candidates radiate amongst voters. According to Greenberg, the U.S. democracy depends on how good a job the news media are doing. The news media, ideally, should fulfill several roles in this democracy. One role of the news media in a democracy is that of a watchdog over government, (Pg.166). Essentially, because the news media looks over everything having to deal with politics, candidates have to be careful of what they post, what they say, and careful of how they are portrayed in media campaigns. The first amendment to the constitution helps ensure that the news media will be able to expose officials behavior without fear of censorship or prosecution and thats why you have to be very cautious about what you say in public. What Obama did One reason you have to be very cautious about what you say in public space is because candidates opposing you could use that information against you for example in President Obamas ad titled Firms, he uses a clip of Mitt Romney. The sound included in this ad is of Mitt Romney singing a very famous American patriotic song America the beautiful slightly out of tune from one of his campaigns in The Villages, Florida. While Mitt Romney is singing, the video contains quotes from articles from Los Angeles times, the Boston Globe, and ABC news all talking about how Mitt Romney has shipped jobs to other places including Mexico, China, and India also it also includes quotes claiming that Mitt Romney had millions and bank accounts in other countries like Switzerland, Bermuda, and the Cayman Islands all during high unemployment rates in the United States. While he is cleaning two want the best for the United States and its economy during high unemployment rates his friendship jobs to other countries he has millions of dollars in banks in other countries. Gave you his information about live funny that many people probably didnt know. Given
this information is an individual who supporting Romney team I have
changed their perspectives on 10 more research about Romney and what else he was hiding. This example goes to show that you have to be careful about what you say or sing in public What Romney did Although what you say can hurt you it can also work in your favor. In Mitt Romneys ad Failing American families the sounds included in this video are of Romney giving a speech and background music that doesnt seem to be the main focus of the video it is only there to supplement Romneys speech which is meant to be focused on. This ad also contains graphs showing that the national debt has been gradually getting higher and that the household income has been getting smaller since Obama took office. The ad also includes a video of Mitt Romney giving a strong speech about how we have the moral responsibility not to spend more than what we take in and not keep passing our debt to our kids while including a picture of a small child that looks sad and gloomy. The producer of this ad and intends to make Obama look like he is spending so much that he is leaving more debt to Americas future generations and also leaving the household income smaller. In essence, it is making the viewers scared that Obama does not care at all about children or future generations because of all of the debt that he is leaving. This ad was effective in making viewers think about the future and how our kids and future generations are supposed to overcome the duct with lower household incomes. Although, what Romney said was used against him, it was also used in his favor to help boost his campaign. What you should know about swing states The other factor which is one of the most important in determining the success of a campaign is having knowledge about the people. This is important to candidates especially in swing states. According to Greenberg, swing states are important because, concentrating in swing states has been an increased trend in America (Pg.296). Therefore, knowing who the people that support you are can help determine where a candidate does not need to spend so much resources in; and on the other hand, knowing who the people that are not completely sure of who they support will give a candidate key information on where to invest more resources in. Additionally, knowing the demographics of the people can also help a candidate to recognize which are the demographics supporting them to try to appeal to those same demographics in other states as well. The demographics in Colorado and Florida are very important being that they are swing states. Candidates should focus on income, education, and ethnicity, and, race, age, and gender. Being aware of Ethnicity in swing states is very important because people want to be represented by candidates who are most like them and can relate to them. For instance, in
Colorado, 4.5% of the population is black while in Florida, 13.8% of the
population is black. 2012 Media Campaigns with time new ways of doing politics. And in the 2012 campaign media played a role and had a big influence in the outcome. Although both president Obama, and candidate Romney spent great deal of money on their campaigns, Obamas campaign believed that the digital media was an important new area and spent $47 million on digital campaigning which a substantial increase from $16 million in his 2008 campaign while Mitt Romney only spent 4.7 million on his digital campaign. Pres. Obamas investment in the online world paid off because people became very engaged in the electoral process online and he won the presidential election. Summary In Conclusion, you must be very cautious about what you say in public and you must invest your time and effort into getting to the demographics in every states especially the swings states such as Colorado and Florida, and you must also invest your time into media because it will pay off.