The document discusses a debate television program in Germany that did not invite the far-right AfD party to participate. It argues that excluding a party from such a program treats them unfairly and fails to fulfill the media's responsibility to inform voters of all options. It claims the media should debate all parties openly and challenge their positions with facts and arguments, rather than ignore or silence any party, in order to have constructive discussions and allow viewers to make their own decisions.
Federalist vs. Anti-Federalist: ALL Essays and Articles in One Edition: Founding Fathers' Political and Philosophical Debate, Their Opinions and Arguments about the Constitution:
The document discusses a debate television program in Germany that did not invite the far-right AfD party to participate. It argues that excluding a party from such a program treats them unfairly and fails to fulfill the media's responsibility to inform voters of all options. It claims the media should debate all parties openly and challenge their positions with facts and arguments, rather than ignore or silence any party, in order to have constructive discussions and allow viewers to make their own decisions.
The document discusses a debate television program in Germany that did not invite the far-right AfD party to participate. It argues that excluding a party from such a program treats them unfairly and fails to fulfill the media's responsibility to inform voters of all options. It claims the media should debate all parties openly and challenge their positions with facts and arguments, rather than ignore or silence any party, in order to have constructive discussions and allow viewers to make their own decisions.
The document discusses a debate television program in Germany that did not invite the far-right AfD party to participate. It argues that excluding a party from such a program treats them unfairly and fails to fulfill the media's responsibility to inform voters of all options. It claims the media should debate all parties openly and challenge their positions with facts and arguments, rather than ignore or silence any party, in order to have constructive discussions and allow viewers to make their own decisions.
federal state, elections for Landtag of BaW, Rh.-Pf., Sa-Anh; 03
Elefantenrunde = debate TV, polit. from diff. parties, gather, aims, to get an idea of wh. stand for one party: AfD, democratic party, tpi pol. process Greens + SPD: dont want to take part: AfD -> uninvited falseness, wrong/inapprop./unlogic. treatment logic: channel plan a TV show, air time, provi., , send invitations no force/obligation, free ch., offer: accepted or not, if not: partys prob/4 for electoral campaign, no voters; chance, regret y kick out oth. 2 pls u?, d.no. favour any.b., equal, unbiased, guarant. disc. based on facts, not emotion task of media inform, educate ppl (public service broadcaster), finance, jstfy tkng money -> failed, namely: show who might be in the next Landtag, decide (school, streets, police) 4, AfD had several successes, poll: 17% (-1) ignoring them = influencing the viewers knowledge/opinion, no platfrm, outcome/result dont agree, but opposition: qst things outcome: less discussions as counter-arguments are not mentioned, not deeply parties = debating = failed reason: no party like others, law task, power, responsibility 2we ago: Maaen Verfassungsschutz: no surveillance, AfD is ok stupid polemic, to start legal proceedings, Federal Constitutional Court only true reason.: n. want 2 talk 4 wh.ev. r. enemy, rival, agst everyth. u value, serious threat (honestly: ignore?!) u: r, they: wr, weak points, extremist att., reveal truth convinced, argu date, prepare: know afds argu bc/o prev. interviews -> count.a., numbers (prove: wr.), arg. struc. Canadas NGPM: criteria: be persuasive, convince ppl, wr. job, many against one, support democracy is left alone d- is great, save d- -> y not w/ d. means?, gov.+opp. variety of diff. op., debates, not one best/true, find solutions name probs, HOLD debate, not silence, against aims (-> even harder 2 underst.)
Federalist vs. Anti-Federalist: ALL Essays and Articles in One Edition: Founding Fathers' Political and Philosophical Debate, Their Opinions and Arguments about the Constitution: