Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Catevidencetablefinal
Catevidencetablefinal
EVIDENCE TABLE
Name: Annie Guiliano and Danielle Palmer
Date: October 8, 2015
Focus Question: Does physical exercise improve the driving performance of older adults?
Rationale for inclusion/exclusion criteria applied to determine which articles should be included in the evidence table: Articles
were in included if they: were Level I and II articles, written in English, published in peer reviewed journals, provided full article
publication and contained and answered all aspects of the (PICO) focus question.
Author/
Year
Study
Objectives
Level/Design/
Subjects
Intervention and
Outcome Measures
Results
Study
Limitations
Implications for OT
DAmbrosio
(2013)
Intervention: The
intervention group
exercised using the
Microsoft Xbox and
Kinect system. The
exercises on the
Electronic Arts (EA)
Active Sports 2 package
were designed by an
expert specifically for
older adults. The
The intervention
group was faster to
enter the vehicle
compared to the
control group. Also
the intervention
group improved
their time getting
into the vehicle
from pretest to
posttest compared to
Subjects: The
participants were
community dwelling
drivers whose ages
ranged from 60-74. All
participants were
recruited from eastern
Massachusetts. No
participants reported
any significant health
conditions that would
prohibit them from
participating in the
exercise program. The
gender of the
participants was not
addressed.
Marmeleira,
Melo,
Tlemcani, &
Fernandes
(2013)
Level/Design:
Level II/Cross-sectional
Subjects:
Participants were
recruited in recreational
and sports associations
in the region of Evora
(Portugal) by posted
flyers and public
meetings. General
inclusion criteria were:
age 55 years or older;
living independently in
the community; healthy
without serious
cardiovascular or
musculoskeletal
disease; possessing a
valid driving license;
Intervention:
There were 3 groups, a
tennis group, a runners
group, and a control
group. They completed a
battery of four on-theroad driving tests. There
was no intervention
administered. The
participants were
determined to fit the
criteria for each group, so
they already had the
intervention in place
and established. The
testing measures were
described in detailed as
well as the recruitment of
participants.
the population we
are investigating.
20/40 or greater
corrected vision;
normal cognitive status
on the Mini Mental
State Examination
(MMSE). Additional
specific inclusion
criteria were: drivers in
the control group had
not been engaged in
any exercise program
for the last two years;
runners and tennis
players had been
engaged in these sports
at least two times per
week for the last two
years. Only male
drivers were recruited
because there were very
few women meeting the
inclusion criteria for the
sport groups. Thirtysix male active drivers
(12 by group) of ages
55 to 76 years were
enrolled in the study.
Questionnaires were
administered to gather
information on
demographic variables,
sport practice, driving
history, and medical
conditions.
Outcome Measures:
Reaction time (RT),
measured from the onset
of the leading cars brake
lights to the initial release
of the accelerator by the
driver participant;
movement time, the
period from the initial
release of the accelerator
to the initial brake
application; and response
time, measured from the
onset of the leading cars
brake lights to the
participants initial brake
application
Six red LED were
positioned 10, 20, 30
degrees to the left (L)
and right (R).
Participants had to react
to lights and performance
was recorded in the form
of number of signal
misses and RTs in
milliseconds.
Participants were given a
2 choice task and
instructed to react to
either of the 2 stimuli by
different methods.
Performance was
evaluated by the RTs and
number of errors. RT to
Sayers &
Gibson
(2012)
Level/Design:
Level I/RCT
Subjects:
Eligible participants
were between the ages
of 65-90 years,
ambulatory with or
without an assistive
device (cane or 3 post
walker only) and
community dwelling.
Exclusion criteria
consisted of history of
heart disease, severe
visual impairment,
presence of
neurological disease,
pulmonary disease
requiring the use of
oxygen, uncontrolled
hypertension, hip
fracture or lower
extremity joint
replacement in the past
6 months, and current
participation in
structured exercise.
Intervention:
The HSPT and SSST
groups exercised 3 times
per week for 12 weeks
using computerinterfaced Keiser a420
pneumatic leg press and
seated knee extension
resistance training
equipment. For HSPT,
each training session
consisted of 3 sets of 1214 repetitions at 40% of
max. Participants
performed an explosive
movement at high speed
during the concentric
phase of each repetition,
paused for one-second,
and performed the
eccentric portion of the
contraction over 2-3
seconds. The SSPT
group also exercised 3
times per week for 12
weeks with each training
session consisting of 3
sets of 8-10 repetitions at
When significant
associations were
found, those
variables were used
as covariates in all
analysis of variance
(ANOVA) models.
To evaluate baseline
differences in
subject
characteristics a
one-way ANOVA or
chi-square was run.
To evaluate baseline
differences among
groups in leg press
muscle
performance, the
change scores in
peak power, peak
power velocity, and
peak power force
with training were
calculated at each
condition and a
univariate ANOVA
was run covarying
for the baseline
measure. To
evaluate differences
among groups in
braking speed from
baseline to post
training, the change
score was calculated
and a univariate
ANOVA was run
covarying for the
baseline measure.
To determine
differences between
groups in average
daily RPE and work
performed during
the 12 week
intervention,
independent
samples t-tests were
performed between
the HSPT and SSST.
Statistical
significance for all
test was accepted at
P < 0.05. Data are
reported as means
(95% CI). Post hoc
tests showed that
both peak power
and peak power
velocity HSPT was
greater than CON
across all external
resistance 40-90%
of max (p 0.02),
while SSST was
only greater than
CON from 70-90%
of max (p 0.04).
These findings
indicate the HSPT
exerted a broader
training effect than
SSPT when
comparing the
change in baseline
power and speed
across a range of
typically
encountered
external resistances.
Univariate ANOVA
demonstrated a
significant group
main effect for the
change in braking
speed with training
(p = 0.02). There
was a difference in
average daily RPE
between HSPT and
SSPT (p 0.001)
during both leg
press and knee
extension exercise.
These results
indicate that despite
being exposed to
similar workloads
during training,
HSPT perceived the
exercise to be easier.
Chattha
(2011)
Level/Design:
Level I/RCT
Subjects:
A multi-step protocol
was used to recruit
participants for the
intervention. Recruited
sedentary older adults
within the city of
Thunder Bay, Ontario
by television and
newspaper
advertisements, posters
and flyers. Letters
describing the study
and enrollment criteria
were distributed to
interested parties.
Announcements were
made in the Lakehead
University community
bulletin, which was
distributed to university
staff and students by
email and also
displayed on website.
131 individuals were
then screened, of which
70 satisfied enrollment
criteria. Then those
Intervention:
Intervention consists of
12 weeks of both aerobic
and anaerobic exercise.
Cardiovascular training
consisted of brisk
walking for 30 to 40
minutes, three days per
week. The muscular
component included
standard strength training
exercises for 1-3 sets of
10-15 reps of each
exercise for 3 days per
week. The flexibility
component involved
performing 4 reps of
standard total body, static
stretches for 3 days per
week.
Outcome Measures:
Stroop Colour-Word Test
Trail Making Test
Useful Field of View test
Driving Simulation Test
Cardiorespiratory Fitness
Endurance Level
Body Composition
Flexibility
Barriers Self-Efficacy
MANCOVAs were
conducted by
entering post-test
values as the
dependent variables
and pre-test values
as covariates.
Barriers to SelfEfficacy score
differed
significantly across
experimental and
control participants.
The study
demonstrates that
unsupervised fitness
intervention of
short-term duration
can produce
significant cognitive
changes in
sedentary older
adults, which are
particularly relevant
to safe driving.
Analysis showed
that visual attention
improved
significantly
compared to control
group.
One limitation of
the study was the
low participation
rate of 17.7%. The
sample size was
small, and overall
sample consisted of
participants over
three decades.
More precise age
differences might
have been washed
out due to the large
age range in the
study.
Experimental
groups mean score
on selective
attention improved
by 43.37 ms, while
the control groups
mean declined 43.19
ms after the 12 wks.
No significant
differences were
recorded in driving
scenarios.
maintain their
independence by staying
behind the wheel.
Education and training of
OT students:
Driving performance of
older adults is part of the
curriculum for many OT
students. Utilizing the
intervention of exercise is
an important implication
for this study.
Refinement, revision, and
advancement of factual
knowledge or theory:
Exercise is known to have
many benefits. The effect
of exercise on driving
skills of older adults have
not had substantial focus.
This study can contribute
to the knowledge base of
the many benefits of
exercise.
Marmeleira,
Soares de
Melo,
Tlemcani, &
Godinho
(2011)
conducted, willing to
fully participate, must
be able to transport
oneself to and from the
fitness center.
Level/Design:
Level I/RCT
Subjects:
Participants were
recruited from the local
community by posted
flyers and local radio
and newspaper
announcements. 26
participants fulfilled the
inclusion criteria, of
being age 55 or more,
living independently in
the community, being
healthy without serious
cardiovascular or
musculoskeletal
disease, and having a
valid driving license,
good visual acuity, and
normal cognition. The
age ranges were 55-76
years and 57-68 years
in the exercise group
(EG) and control group
(CG), with 9 and 8
women in the CG and
EG.
Intervention:
The intervention was a
supervised exercise
program 3 days/week for
8 weeks. Sessions were
60 minutes. Exercise
incorporated physical
tasks that induced the
participants to respond to
challenging situations by
producing the desirable
motor responses,
activities strongly
depending on working
memory, and cooperative
games requiring a
dynamic group behavior.
It was a physical exercise
program in which
cognitively challenging
tasks are executed by the
older adults undertaking
physical activities such
as walking, stepping,
reaching, throwing, and
manipulating objects.
Outcome Measures:
RT, measured from the
onset of the leading cars
In the brake RT
task, significant
improvements were
found in the EG in
RT and response
time. In the
peripheral RT task,
significant
improvements were
found in the EG
group after 8 weeks.
In the choice RT
task, significant
improvements were
found in the EG in
RT. Intergroup
analysis indicated
significant
differences in the 8
week changes
between groups. In
the dual task
condition,
intergroup analysis
indicated significant
differences in the 8
week changes
between groups for
response time.
Weber &
Level/Design: Level I/
At baseline, there
All of the
Porter
(2010)
study was to
determine the
effects of power
training on foot
movement time and
on ankle strength
and power in
mobility-impaired
older women.
RCT
Subjects: The study
included 50 mobilityimpaired women whose
ages ranged from 70-88
years old. Mobility
limitation was defined
as the inability to walk
1 mile at a moderate
pace. The exclusion
criteria were: unstable
acute or chronic
disease, involved in an
exercise program more
than once per week in
last six months, any
neurological or
musculoskeletal
impairment that would
affect their exercise
performance. The
women were recruited
from newspapers,
newsletters, posters,
television, and radio
shows. 192 women
responded but it was
reduced to 50 women
through exclusion
criteria.
was no significant
differences in
reaction time
(P=0.15) and
movement time
(P=0.80) between
the groups. Results
and the P-value
were determined by
two-way repeatedmeasures ANOVA.
At the end of the
study, the results
showed there was a
significant decrease
in movement time in
the elastic bands
exercise group
(P=0.003 with the
significant level set
as (P=0.017)
whereas there were
not significant
changes in the
weights group
(P=0.03) and the
control group
(P=0.38). There
were no significant
changes in the
strength and power
of the groups.
participants in the
group were women
and were mobility
impaired, which
could affect the
generalization of the
results.
community-based practice
of OT: The study
concludes that, to increase
movement time and
decrease the risk of vehicle
accidents, ankle training
with elastic bands should
be used. This helps with
intervention planning and
goal planning with older
adults who want to
improve their movement
time.
Program development:
The OT can be the main
educator on how to
implement ankle training
with elastic bands to
improve driving
performance.
Societal needs: There are
many older adult women
drivers who have slow
movement time and
decreased ankle strength
which are vital
components of driving
safely.
Health care delivery and
health policy: The results
from the study should be
used to educate clients on
-Short Physical
Performance Battery Test
Caragata,
Tuokko &
Damini
(2009)
Level/Design:
Cohort/ Level 2
Subjects: A fitness
program called Fit to
Drive was advertised
at the local senior
center. Posters in the
senior center were used
to advertise the fitness
program. There were
also coupons given out
for the classes. All
Intervention: The
intervention consisted of
3 main components:
engineering
enhancements, driver
education and physical
fitness. A certified
fitness instructor
developed the fitness
program. The fitness
program focused on the
movements required for
driving: neck and torso
could, in return,
improve their
driving
performance.
Program development:
OTs should educate their
clients on the importance
of physical fitness for
improving driving
performance.
was compared to 3
months ago. They were
also asked what areas of
fitness improved and
which did not, through
the class.
Marmelieira
, Godinho,
& Fernandes
(2009)
Level/Design:
Level I/RCT
Subjects:
Participants were
recruited in the region
of Evora, Portugal by
posted flyers and local
radio/newspaper
announcements.
Questionnaires were
administered to gather
information on
demographic variables,
physical activity
practice, driving habits,
functional impairments,
and medical conditions.
The inclusion criteria
for participants were:
aged 60+; live
independently in the
community; healthy
without serious
cardiovascular or
musculoskeletal
Intervention:
The exercise group
participated in a
supervised exercise
program 3 days a week
for 12 weeks. Each
session lasted
approximately 60
minutes. The exercise
intervention was planned
to stress not only
physiological systems but
also perceptive and
cognitive mechanisms.
Training volume was
characterized as steps per
session. All participants
used pedometers.
Outcome Measures:
Single-task condition was
measured by simple
reaction time and choice
reaction time (driving
simulator
(DS)/established by
computing the mean and
standard deviation (SD)
separately for each group
and dropping any trial
exceeding the mean by 3
or + DSs). Dual-task
condition was measured
identically as above, then
a secondary task was
added. Useful field of
view measured speed of
visual processing,
divided attention, and
selective attention/data
was collected in time. To
measure time-to-contact,
drivers saw video of
oncoming vehicle and
had to press and button
when vehicle reached a
pre-established location.
To measure foot tap test,
drivers had to tap
alternating sides of a 2
inch barrier with R foot
10 times. Timed up and
go test, which consists of
standing up, walking 3
m, turning around,
walking back to chair,
and sitting, was utilized.
Functional reach test
(forward reach), trail
making test (using a
goal of improving
driving
performance.
Marottoli,
Allore,
Araujo,
Iannone,
Acampora,
Gottschalk
& Peduzzi
(2007)
Level/Design: Level I/
RCT
Subjects: There were
178 drivers, all over 70
years of age. They had
to have visual acuity of
20/40 or better and had
to have a score of 24 or
better on the Mini
Mental State
Examination. The
participants were
recruited from clinics
and community
sources.
pencil to sequentially
connect a mix of integers
and letters that are
distributed across a page
in an alternating and
ascending order), and the
Stroop color-word test
were all utilized.
Intervention: The
intervention group
received a weekly visit
for 12 weeks by a
physical therapist who
administered a graduated
exercise program that
addressed physical
abilities needed for
driving. There were 2
physical therapists who
were specifically trained
to administer the exercise
program. The therapist
gradually increased the
intensity of the exercise
program throughout the
12 weeks. The therapist
taught the exercises to
the participants and the
participants were
instructed to perform the
exercises once a day for
15 min. The control
group received monthly
in home education
modules that addressed
One limitation of
the study was that
there were a low
number of females
and few
demographic
differences in the
participants. Also,
the clinical
relevance of the
study was unknown.
Yes, there was a
2.43 point
difference between
the treatment group
and the control
group but what does
that imply? There
were 2 different
physical therapists
who were giving the
exercise program.
Ostrow,
Shaffron, &
McPherson
(1992)
Outcome Measures:
On-road driving
performance (rated in 3
different ways)
1.) 36- item scale
assessing the
participants driving
maneuvers and traffic
situations
2.) Evaluators overall
rating
3.) Critical errors that
were committed by the
participant
Intervention:
The experimental group
participated in an 8 week
range-of-motion exercise
training program which
focused on static-type
stretching exercises of
the upper body. The
exercises were adapted to
meet the requirements of
the designated driving
skills. The experimental
group completed their
(p=.29) The
intervention group
maintained their
driving performance
while the control
group declined.
There was also
fewer falls in the
intervention group
compared to the
control group (this
analysis was not
statistically
significant). The
SAS version 8.1
was used for all
statistical analysis
and the value of
0.05 was used to test
significance.
increase driving
performance for the
elderly can be
implemented to increase
overall community safety.
Education and training of
OT students: OT students
should be educated in how
to create and implement
home exercise programs
for their clients.
Refinement, revision, and
advancement of factual
knowledge or theory:
Further research still needs
to be conducted on home
exercise programs that
increase driving
performance.
A limitation of the
study was that the
participants were all
recruited from the
Morgantown, West
Virginia area and no
were else, which
could lead to biases.
The participants had
to self-report if they
completed the
exercises.
announcements on the
radio, television, and
the newspapers. They
were also recruited
through Rotary,
Kiwanis clubs and the
American Association
of Retired Persons.