Ali M.

Al-Shurafa

3 Jan 2004

Resonance Analysis
A Vertical Pump Case History
Ali M. Al-Shurafa
Email: ashurafa[remove.all.in.and.brackets]@gawab.com
Jubail Industrial College
Saudi Arabia

Key words:
Resonance, pump, vibration, impact test, stiffness, structure

Background:
The case history in this article is for a vertical cooling water pump delivering
seawater from a bay to a power plant's heat exchangers. The maintenance activities
implemented based on vibration analysis were quite inexpensive and brief in time
which could not be achieved without the proper vibration tests.
The vibration technician reported vibration increasing trends on this machine
from the periodic survey. The machine had a PM a few months ago while the standby
pump is planned to have the PM soon. This put some constrains on both analysis and
the recommendation. Operation parameters of the pump and motor, including
pressure, flow and current were normal. No abnormal sounds were noticed. A
schematic drawing for the machine structure is given in Figure 1 along with the points
at which the data was collected. The synchronous speed of the motor is 600 rpm.

Figure 1 Schematic of the machine

Vibration Data:
Table 1 summarizes the unfiltered vibration reading on six points, as their
locations are indicated in Figure 1. A trend of the highest vibration point (MTA) is
given in Figure 2. From the trend it can be noticed that the majority of the vibration
signal is synchronous (1x Rpm) vibration. This was confirmed also by corresponding
spectrum of the same point in Figure 3.

I:\MyArticles\MachineCases\SWP2\VerCase12.doc

1 /4

Ali M. Al-Shurafa

3 Jan 2004

Table 1 Unfiltered vibration data on 26 May

Motor Top In-line (MTI), ips 0-p
0.20
Motor Bottom In-line (MBI) , ips 0-p
0.12

Motor Top Across (MTA) , ips 0-p

0.41
Motor Bottom Across (MBA) , ips 0-p
0.12

Motor Top Axial (MTAx) , ips 0-p

0.04
Motor Bottom Axial (MBAx) , ips 0-p
0.04

ST0A - #1/2 Service Water Pump A

SWP 1/2A -MTA Motor TopAcross Seismic

.45
.0500

30

03 -May -03

19 -Apr-03

30 -Mar-0 3

23 -Feb-0 3

.45
.0500

15 -Mar-0 3

PK Ve loc ity in In/Se c

26 -May -03

1x Rpm

60
Days: 14-Feb-03 To 30-May-03

Overall Value

90

120

Date: 26-May-03
Time: 08:04:04
Amp2: .395

Figure 2 Unfiltered and 1x vibration trend

ST0A - #1/2 Service Water Pump A
SWP 1/2A -MTA Motor Top Across Seismic

0.6

Rout e Spectrum
26-May-03 08:04:04
OVERALL= .4133 V-DG
PK = .4110
LOAD = .0
RPM = 599. (9.98 Hz)

PK Velocity in In/Sec

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0
0

10000

20000
Frequency in CPM

30000

Freq:
Ordr:
Spec:

592.12
.989
.407

Figure 3 Vibration spectrum from routine survey

Analysis:
Vibration reading was collected on the monitor mode to check the stability of
the signature and no abnormalities were noticed. To confirm the exact frequency at
which the vibration is taking place and examine the existence of any other significant
frequencies, a high resolution data was collected with 3200 lines, as shown in Figure
4. The resultant spectrum showed single amplitude at the running speed.

I:\MyArticles\MachineCases\SWP2\VerCase12.doc

2 /4

Ali M. Al-Shurafa

3 Jan 2004

The amplitude difference between the response of the two radial readings
(MTI and MTA) gave a hint for a problem related directional force or stiffness.
Coupling alignment as per Maintenance records were within tolerance after
installation. Motor bottom bearing and coupling temperatures were normal (measured
using a temperature gun). So realignment was not considered as a first action. Rather,
motor was shut down for visual inspection and impact test.
No abnormalities were found after the visual inspection and the impact test
spectrum is given in Figure 5. It is very clear from the impact test that the structure
natural frequency was coinciding on the running speed casing vibration amplitudes to
magnify due to resonance. Engineering reports recorded that this pump after the
current installation had a natural frequency of 700 cpm and cautioned that the natural
frequency of the sister machines is higher (800 cpm). The conclusion that could be
drawn is that the stiffness of the structure was initially low and gradually decreased
and pushing the natural frequency down closer to the running speed 600 rpm, as
described by the basic formula:
Stiffness
Natural Frequency =
Mass

Corrective Action:
The corrective action was to raise the natural frequency above the running
speed by identifying the location of the low stiffness parts of the structure. These
locations are typically the "joints" like the motor-motor stool bolts and the motor
stool-ground studs. By tightening the bolts and studs, the problem was found to be
corroded and loose studs and nut as can be seen from the picture (Figure 6). A
temporary solution was to replace the studs and nut while the permanent solution was
recommended to perform a civil work in the concrete foundation. The foundation was
physically deteriorated because of the more water contamination and settlement than
sister machines in the same. After replacement, vibration dropped to about 15 % of
the previous readings.
ST0A - #1/2 Service Water Pump A
SWP 1/2A -MTA Motor Top Across Seismic

0.5

PK Velocity in In/Sec

PK = .3893
LOAD = .0
RPM = 600. (10.01 Hz)

594. 01

0.4

Analyze Spectrum
27-May-03 08:33:41

0.3

0.2

0.1

0
0

10000
3200 Line Res olution

20000

30000

Frequency in CPM

Freq:
Ordr:
Spec:

592.50
.987
.348

Figure 4 High resolution spectrum showing exact 1x vibration response

I:\MyArticles\MachineCases\SWP2\VerCase12.doc

3 /4

Ali M. Al-Shurafa

3 Jan 2004
ST0A - #1/2 Service Water Pump A
SWP 1/2A -MTA Motor Top Across Seismic

0.05

Analyze Spectrum
08-Jun-03 10:05:32
PK = .0439
LOAD = .0
RPM = 600. (10.00 Hz)

PK Velocity in In/Sec

0.04

0.03

0.02

0.01

0
0

10000

20000

30000

Frequency in CPM
Label: Impact test

Freq:
Ordr:
Spec:

600.00
1.000
.03435

Figure 5 Spectrum of impact test showing 600 cpm natural frequency

Figure 6 Physical deterioration in the foundation, bolts and nuts

I:\MyArticles\MachineCases\SWP2\VerCase12.doc

4 /4