Gretchen Hyer argues that there must be a balance between individuality and conformity for a functional society. Complete individuality would make laws and order impossible, while complete conformity would oppress minorities. This balance is achieved through rules and tolerance. Laws provide security and order as long as they do not restrict individuality. For differences to be accepted, the majority must be tolerant of all minorities and vice versa. When discrimination is eliminated and people abide by guidelines while expressing their uniqueness, individuality can thrive within an orderly society.
Gretchen Hyer argues that there must be a balance between individuality and conformity for a functional society. Complete individuality would make laws and order impossible, while complete conformity would oppress minorities. This balance is achieved through rules and tolerance. Laws provide security and order as long as they do not restrict individuality. For differences to be accepted, the majority must be tolerant of all minorities and vice versa. When discrimination is eliminated and people abide by guidelines while expressing their uniqueness, individuality can thrive within an orderly society.
Gretchen Hyer argues that there must be a balance between individuality and conformity for a functional society. Complete individuality would make laws and order impossible, while complete conformity would oppress minorities. This balance is achieved through rules and tolerance. Laws provide security and order as long as they do not restrict individuality. For differences to be accepted, the majority must be tolerant of all minorities and vice versa. When discrimination is eliminated and people abide by guidelines while expressing their uniqueness, individuality can thrive within an orderly society.
Lundstrom HELA January 8, 2016 (Tyranny of the Majority)
Protection against persecution
All people need, crave the ability to be themselves, the ability to be unique and to be accepted for it. Though, when everyone is truly unique and doing completely different things society cannot work. There could be no laws to retain order because whoever committed what is currently seen as a crime could say that they were only doing what makes them themselves. There could not be legitimate punishment because there would not be legitimate faults. However on the flip side of that idea, if all people were required to do the exact same thing there would be no accepted individuality. Any minority would be oppressed and discriminated against by the majority for not conforming to societal demands. It would be a world that embraces prejudice and hate to keep unity within its clutches. There must be a balance between these unhappy extremes of civilization! And there is. The keys to a functional and accepting society are rules and tolerance. Laws, guidelines, commandments, and rules are the backbone of humanity. Without any form or fashion of directives chaos would rule and all civility would be forgotten. Yet, with laws, people have an increased sense of security and peace because they know that unbroken laws keep them safe. Now individuality has a chance to emerge from the masses as long as it does not break set rules. Benevolent uniqueness can start its journey into society, but to have differences become accepted, tolerance must come into play as well. Tolerance by the majority of all other minorities and vice versa greatly increases the possibility of a symbiotic relationship with the citizens of the human race. Society must be rid of all prejudices and hate for differences to be rid of tyrannical actions against differences. This creates an environment of protection against uncivil punishments for personal independence. People will no longer have to fret about being openly judged for being themselves. Once discrimination becomes a cultural taboo the safeguard for personality is eternally fortified. Humanity abiding by the same guidelines and exercising the freedom of their agency in beneficial manner lets individuality thrive. All people accepting uniqueness of persons while encouraging peaceful behavior maintains the hope of a functional society. That enables the cravings of matchlessness to be satisfied while keeping the order of a community intact. With this compromise between two extremes there can be a reality of happiness in difference and freedom from oppressive opinion.