The judges of the Supreme Court are not bound to declare their assets. While a 1997 resolution provides that judges should voluntarily disclose financial assets to the Chief Justice, this disclosure is not mandatory and the constitution does not require judges to disclose their assets. Asset disclosure would only become mandatory if the legislature passes a law regarding disclosure of assets.
The judges of the Supreme Court are not bound to declare their assets. While a 1997 resolution provides that judges should voluntarily disclose financial assets to the Chief Justice, this disclosure is not mandatory and the constitution does not require judges to disclose their assets. Asset disclosure would only become mandatory if the legislature passes a law regarding disclosure of assets.
The judges of the Supreme Court are not bound to declare their assets. While a 1997 resolution provides that judges should voluntarily disclose financial assets to the Chief Justice, this disclosure is not mandatory and the constitution does not require judges to disclose their assets. Asset disclosure would only become mandatory if the legislature passes a law regarding disclosure of assets.
No. The judges of Supreme court are not bound to declare their assets. The resolution of 1997 provides that the judges should disclose the details of their financial assets to the Chief Justice of Domalia. This is voluntary in nature and not mandatory. There is no such provision in the constitution which mandates judges to do so. The disclosure of assets is mere statutory. If the legislature makes any law relating to the disclosure of assets only then it is a public document. All the details regarding to salaries, allowance, grants is