Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Compressibility of Soils
Compressibility of Soils
Compressibility of Soils
Compressibility of Soil
total settlement
primary consolidationsettlement
secondaryconsolidationsettlemcnt
immediate scttlement
IMMEDIATE
SETTLEMENT
10.1
Iftl
Circle
Rectanglc
1.00
1.12
1.36
1..53
1.78
2.10
I
1.5
2
3
-5
l0
20
2.99
3.57
4.01
-s0
l(x)
l.u
0.79
0.it8
1.0'7
1.21
1.42
1.70
2.10
2.46
3.0
2.0
-). +-l
0.64
0.56
0.68
0.77
0.u9
1.0-5
1.27
1.49
Table 10.1 givesthe influcncefactors for rigid and flexible foundations.Representativevaluesof the modulus of elasticityand Poisson'sratio for different types of
s o i l sa r c g i v e ni n T a b l e s 1 0 . 2a n d 1 0 . 3 .r e s p e c t i v c l y .
N o t e t h a t E q . ( 1 t ) I. ) i s b a s c do n t h e a s s u m p t i o nt h a t t h e p r c s s u r eA o i s a p p l i e d
In practicc, l'oundationsarc placed at a ccrtain depth below
at the ground surl'ercc.
the ground surlarcc.Deepcr foundation embedmcnt tends to reduce the magnitude
o[ tlre foundertionsettlententS,..However, if Eq. (lt). l) is uscd to calculate settlem c n t " i t r e s u l t si n a c o n s e r v a t i v e s t i m a t e .
kN/m2
-3.-5(X)
I ,t3(X)
6,(XD 14,000
r 0.000,28,0(x)
-70,000
35.0(X)
Poisson'sratio, p,
0.2,0.4
0.25- 0.4
0.3- 0.4-5
0.2-0.4
-0.25
0.1-5
0.2 0.5
lb / in.2
250-500
-2,(XX)
t350
- 4,000
1,-s00
- 10.(xx)
-5.000
E x amp l e1 0 .1
Estimatethe immediatesettlementof a columnfooting 1.5m in diameterthat is
constructedon an unsaturatedclay layer,giventhat the total load carriedby the
column footing = 150kN, E. : 7000kN/m2,and p, :0.25. Assumethe footing
to be rigid.
Solution
UsingEq. (10.1),we have
s", - AoB
[,s-:
1J
E
In
(\ -1"s' 0t )
:84.9kN/mr
[o sY
From Table10.1,for a circularrigid foundation,l,,: 0.79,so
Ir *nrslI
s" : (84,9)(1
5)l-
10.3
: 0.013-s
m : L3.5
mm
7000-lto.zo)
B ,- , i
\l
tiBL
rr
( I { ) . 3 a)
(10.3b)
E,:
E,,* kz.
( 10.4)
t
I
/ '...
A
'
C o m p r e s s i b l seo i l l a y e r
F
"f"' '"'"
I
I
It
' .
I
I
I
v
,: .
R i"'-"
gidlaycr
hlB,,= 0.2
.,
, Figure 10.4 Yariation of 1.r with B
Eo
kB,,
26s
s,:
LoB*!!t(r pi)
(ro.s)
E,,lkB,,ancl,hlB,,.Thcfounilationrigid_
4 6 r) (
#t-)w
(10.6)
Ir - I -
/u
(10.7)
- 0 . 4 ) l r*, , 0 , , |
3.5 exp(t.22p",
Figures 10.-5
and 10.6showthc variations
ol /0,and 1r.exprcssedb y E q s .( 1 0 . 6a) n d
(r0.7).
1.0
0.9
+ o.t{5
0.lt
r' = ( - + \ / : : \
\ u , ,+*^) \ t )
= F l e x i b i l i t yf : r c r o r
0.1
0.001 2
4 6 80.01
0.I
10.0
I 00.0
Kt..
0.9
-s 0.1t5
0.tt
0.75
t\.1
0
r0
15
!,.,
8,,
Example10.2
Refer to Figure 10.3.For a shallowfoundationsupportedby a silty clay,the following are given:
Length:L:1.5m
Width: B - 1m
Depth of foundation : D/ : 1 ill
Thicknessof foundation : / : 0.23m
Load per unit area: Ao : 190kN/m2
E r : 1 5 x 1 0 6k N / m 2
The silty claysoil had the followingproperties:
h-2m
&, : 0'3
E = 9000kN/m2
k : 500kN/m2/m
Estimatethe immediatesettlementof the foundation.
267
Solution
From Eq. (10.3a),the equivalent diameter is
1.38m
Ao : 190kN/m2
E,
9000
-_,,1 1: _
'^^:13.0.1
kB,. (sooxt.38)
h
B"
2
:
1.39
1 4 5
^^."(;T1{#)'
I' r : L4+
: 0.781
r38 l
[0,,t, (f)rr*r]L
From Eq. (10.7),
Ir:
1*
*
3.5 exp(\.22p.,
- It
-
,.r(* + 1 6 )
I
- oof(f
3.5expi(1
.22)(0.3)
= 0.907
+ 1.6)
L,oB,Ir;l1ls,_
E
n
= 0.014 m * 14 mm
jr
(re0)(1.38x0.74X0.787)(0.90f)
r\ -I _ n
" ' "r lz )
9000
268
CONSOLIDATIONSETTLEMENT
10.4
Fundamentals of Consolidation
When a saturatedsoil layer is subjectedto a stressincrease.the pore water pressure
is suddenly increased.In szrndysoils that are highly permeable.the drainagecaused
by the increasein the pore water pressure is completed immcdiately. Pore water
drainageis accompaniedby a reduction in thc volumc of thc soil mass,which results
in settlement.Becauseof rapid drainageof thc porc watcr in sandy sclils,immediate
s e t t l e m e n ta n d c o n s o l i d a t i o no c c u r s i m u l t a n c o u s l y .
When a saturatedcompressibleclay lzryeris subjectedto a strcssincrcasc,elastic settlement occurs immcdiately. Becausethe hydraulic conductivity of clay is significzrntlysmaller than that of sand,thc cxcesspore water pressuregeneratedby loadi n g g r a d u a l l yd i s s i p a t c so v e r a l o n g p e r i o d .T h u s . t h e a s s o c i a t e vdo l u m e c h a n g e( t h a t
i s , t h c c o n s o l i d a t i o n )i n t h e c l a y m a y c o n t i n u el o n g a f t e r t h e i m m e d i a t cs c t t l c m e n t .
Thc settlementcauseclby consolidationin clay marybc scvcraltimcs grcater than the
i m m c d i l r l cs e l l l e m c n t .
T h c t i m c - d e p e n d e n td e l i r r m a t i o no f s a t u r a t e dc l a y e ys o i l c a n b c s t b c u n d e r s t o o d b y c o n s i d c r i n ga s i m p l e m o d e l t h a t c i l n s i s t so [ a c y l i n d e r w i t h a s p r i n g a t i t s
'l'he
cylinc e n t e r .L e t t h c i n s i d oa r r :a o f t h e c r o s ss c c t i o no f t h e c y l i n d e rb e e q u a lt o A .
d e r i s f i l l e d w i t h w a t c r a n d h a sa f r i c t i o n l c s sw a t e r t i g h tp i s t o na n d v a l v ea s s h o w ni n
F i g u r c 1 0 . 7 aA
. t t h i s t i m c . i [ ' w e p l a c ea l o a d P o n t h e p i s t o n( F i g u r e 1 0 . 7 b )a n d k e e p
t h c v a l v c c l o s e c lt,h c e n t i r e l o a d w i l l b e t a k e n b y t h e w a t e r i n t h e c y l i n d c r b c c a u s e
watcr is intrtmprassible.The spring will not go through zrnydcf'ornraticln.Thc cxcess
hydrostaticpressureat this tirne can be given as
P
( 10.8)
A
This value can be obscrvcd ir.rthc prcssurcgaugeattachedto the cylinder.
. c c l r nw r i t c
I n g e n c r a lw
P : P,-l P,,
(10.9)
where P, : load carricd by the spring and P,,,- lcladcarried by the water.
From the preceding discussion,we celnsee that when the valve is closed after
the placement of the load I
P, : 0
and
P,,,: P
Now, if the valve is opened, the water will flow outward (Figure 10.7c).This flow will
be accompaniedby a reduction of the excesshydrostaticpressureand an increasein
the compressionof thc spring. So, at this time" Eq. ( lt).9) will hold. However,
P.>0
a n d P , ,1, P
After some time, the excesshydrostatic pressurewill become zero and the system
will reach a state of equilibrium, as shown in Figure 10.7d.Now we can write
P,:
and
P,": t)
Valve
I closed
:fi{s:s
i:.;
ff'
l #, :
/
Aa=0
Art = aA
(a)
(D)
P
....:
't
Vrlvc
opcn
rit;,i;ir:i;ri:ii:::iri;*:ii:i:lriii:i:
::1: lr:ltlil
ilrlili$i!i
Vrlvc
oPcll
---*-l
I
::t;it!ii:!:ii:ri:$l:j.itit;.*t*lii:i:ilr:{;
SXIljllti
'
.
-.J''
Att---
(e)
and
P:P,tP,,,
W i t h t h i s i n m i n d , w e c a n a n a l y z et h e s t r a i no f a s a t u r a t e ccl l a y l a y e r s u b j e c t e d
to a stressincrcase(Figure 10.8a).Consider the casewherc a layer of saturatedclay
o f t h i c k n e s sH t h a t i s c o n f i n e d b e t w e c n t w o l a y e r s o fs a n c il s b e i n g s u b j e c t e d t o a n
instantaneousincrease of tolul r'/re.r.r
o[ Ao. This incremental total stress will be
transmitted to the pore water and the soil solids.This meansthat the total stress,Ao,
will be divided in some proportion betwcen effectivcstressand pore water pressure.
The behavior of the cffectivestrcsschangewill be similar to that of the spring in Figure 10'7,and the behavior of the pore water pressurechangewill be similar to that
of the excesshydrostatic pressurc in Figure 10.7.From the principle of effective
stress(Chapter tt). it follows that
Ao:
Ao' * Arl
(10.10)
AO
Depth
(r)
Pore water
Total stressincreasc
plcssure lncrelse-
ElI'ectivc
strossincrerse
i
'fotal
stressincrcasc
I
H
(c)Attime0<r<-
)<tre wttcr
pressure increase
Eflective
\tressincrease
Depth
Depth
(d)At timet = -
Depth
Figure 10.8 Variation of total stress.pore water pressure, and effective stress in a clay layer
drained at top and bottom as the result of an added stress,A<r
270
271
Ao:Arr'*Arr
(Ao'>0
and Arr<Arr)
However' thc magnitudesof Arr' and Arr at various depthswill change(Figurc
1O.gc),
dependingon the minimum disternce
of thc drainagepath to either rhe top 9r bettom
sand layer.
Theoretically' at timc 1 : oo, the entirc excesspore water prcssurewcluld
bc
..
dissipatedby drainage from erllpoints of the clay layer; thus, A4 : 0. Now
the total
stressincreasc,A.', will be carricd by thc soil structurc (Figurc 10.ltcl).
Hcncc,
:
Arr
Arr'
T h i s g r a d u a lp r o c e s so 1 ' d r a i n a g eu n d e r a n a c l d i t i o n a l o a d a p p l i c a t i o n
and the
associatedtransfcr of excesspore water prcssureto efTectiveslresscilusc
thc timed e p e n d e n ts e t t l e m e n ti n t h c c l a y s o i l l a y e r .
10.5
StageIII
272
l'
:1i*'.:
Sncclnltn
i$ilr.' ,;ng
4:!.:l
M!*si!;
ittritii
:i!g!:ti:i
.:i!it!:t.;tj
Figure 10.9
(a) Schematiccliagramo[ a consolidonrcter;
( b ) p h o t o g r a p ho l a c o n s o l i d o r n c t c r(,c ) a c o n s o l i d a l i o nt c s t i n p r o g r c s s( r i g h t - h a n csl i d c )
.2
c
I
S e c o n d a r cy o n s o l i d a t i o n
Figure 10.10
Time-deformation plot during
consolidationfor a given load
increment
10.6
w'
Jt4,
AG,7,,,
AG.,P*
(10.11)
H,,: H - H,
(10.12)
r r t :
V,
V,
H,A
H,A
H,
H,
(10.13)
274
tI
I
I
T
I
I
H,=H
Initial
h e i g h to f
speclmen
=H
H,
. --Lu,
II
"'
,lC,y,,
LII,
H*
(r 0 . 1 4 )
( A H , i s o b t a i n e df r o m t h c i n i t i a l a n d t h e l l n a l d i a l r e a d i n g sl o r t h e l o a d i n g ) .
It is important to note that. at the end of consolidation,total stressrrl is equal to effective strcssrri.
5. Clalculatethe new void ratio aftcr consoliclationcausedby the pressureincrement as
cr - ae
Ar,
(10.15)
Fcrrthe next loading, o1 (note: o2 cquals thc cumulative load per unit area of
s p e c i m e n ) ,w h i c h c a u s e sa d d i t i o n a ld e f o r m a t i o n A H r , t h e v o i d r a t i o a t t h e e n d o f
consolidation can be calculateclas
(t:
cr -
LI12
H,
(10'16)
At this time. o2 : cffcctive stress,rr!. Proceedingin a similar manner, one can obtain the void ratios at the end of the consolidationfor all load increments.
The efTectivcstrcsso' and the correspondingvoid ratios (c) at the end of consolidation are plotted on semilogarithmicgraph paper. The typical shape of sucha
p l o t i s s h o w ni n F i g u r e 1 0 . 1 2 .
10.7
01
o'r
E l l e c t i v c p r c s s u r c .o ' ( l o g s c a l c )
275
Figure 10.12
Typicalplot of c againstlog o'
geologic processesor humernprocesses.During the soil sampling,the existingeffective overburdcn pressureis also released,which resultsin some expansion.When this
specimenis subjectedto etconsolidationtest,a small amount of compression(that is,
a small changein v<tidratio) will occur when thc effectivepressureapplied is lessthan
the maximum cffective overburden prcssure in the field to which lhe soil has been
subjectedin the past. When the effectivepressureon the specimenbecomesgreater
than the merximumefTectivepast pressure,the changein the void ratio is much larger,
and the e-log o' relationship is practically linear with a steeperslope.
This relationship can be verillcd in the laboratory by loading the specimento
exceedthe maximum effectiveoverburdenpressure,and then unloading and reloading again.The e-log '' plot for such casesis shown in Figure 10.13,in which cd representsunloading and dfg representsthe reloading process.
d
.E
!
Elfectivepressurero'(log scale)
Figure 10.13
Plot of e againstlog a' showingloading,
unloading,and reloadingbranches
o
'E
!
Prcssurc.
o' (logscalc)
pressure
Figure 10.14 Graphicprocedurcl'ordetelminingpreconsolidation
OCR: n L
(r'
where oi : preconsolidation pressure of a speclmen
o' : Dresent effective vertical Dressure
(10.17)
10.8
277
Consolidated
1. ln Figure 10.l-5,curve 2 is the laboratory e-log o' plot. From this plot, determine the prcconsolidationpressure(rrj) : o',, (that is, the present effective
ovcrburden pressure).Knowing where c', : ol1, draw verticalline ab.
2 . C a l c u l a t et h e v o i d r a t i o i n t h e f i c l d . e , , [ S c c t i o n1 0 . 6 ,E q . ( 1 0 . 1 3 ) ] D
. raw horizontal line c'r1.
3. Calculat.e0.4c, and draw line e.f.(Note:.l'is the point of intersectionof the line
w i t h c u r v e2 . )
4. Join points.f and g. Notc that g is the point of intcrsectionof lines ab and cd.
This is thc virgin cornpressioncurvc.
I t i s i m p o r t a n t t o p o i n t o u t t h t t t i f a s o i l i s c o m p l e t e l yr c m o l d e d ,t h e g e n e r a lp o s i t i o n o f t h e c - l o g r . r 'p l o t w i l l b c a s r e p r c s s n t e db y c u r v e 3 .
I
I
Vtrgtn
--
consolidation
curve; slope= C,
Consolidation
curve for
rernoldedspecimen
Latloratory
consolidation
curve
o'o = o','
Pressure,
o' (logscale)
Figure 10. 15 Consolidation characteristics of normally consolidated clay of low to
medium sensitivity
278
Laboratory
rebound curve;
slope = C" =
-5
swell index
O.4eq1
6'o
o'.
P r e s s u r eo.' ( l o g s c a l e )
Figure
nredium scnsitivity
Overconsolidated
1 . I n F i g u r e 1 0 .1 6 ,c u r v c 2 i s t h c l a b o r a t o r ye - l o g o ' p l o t ( l o a d i n g ) ,a n d c u r v e3 i s
thc laboratory unloading,or rebound, curve. From curve 2, determine the preconsolidationpressurerrj..Draw the vertical line ab.
2. Determine the field effectiveoverburden pressureoi;. Draw vertical line cd.
3. Determine the void ratio in the field. er. Draw the horizontal line fg. The point
of intersectionof lines /! and cd is h.
4. Draw a line hi, which is parallel to curve 3 (which is practically a straight line).
The point of intersectionof lines hi and ab is j.
5. Join points 7 and k. Point k is on curve 2, and its ordinate is 0.4e6.
The field consolidationplot will take a path hjk. The recompressionpath in the
fiefd is hj and is parallel to the laboratory rebound curve (Schmertmann,1953).
Example10.3
Following are the resultsof a laboratory consolidationtest on a soil specimen
obtainedfrom the field: Dry massof specimen= L28g, height of specimenat
the beginningof the test : 2.54 cm, G,:2.75, and areaof the specimen=
30,68cm2.
Effeetive
pressure,o'
(ton /ft2)
Final height of
specimen at the
end of consolidation
(cm)
(.)
0.5
I
2
4
8
16
2.540
2.488
2.465
2.431
2.389
z,-12+
2.225
2.115
-)L
Make necessary
calculations
and drawan e vs.log o, curve.
Solution
F r o mE q . ( 1 0 . 1 1 )
w,
H ''. :
M,
AC.,p,,
128g
- 1 . 5 2c m
(30.68cmr)(2.75)(1g/cm3)
Now the followingtablecanbe prepared:
AG,T,,
Effective
pressure, rr'
(ton /ft2l
o
0..5
1
2
4
8
l6
2.540
2.488
2.465
2.431
2.389
JL
z--)/+
2.225
2.175
Hn = H - H"
(cml
1.02
0.968
0.94-s
0.911
0.ti69
0.804
0.705
0.595
e = HulH"
0.671
0.637
0.622
0.599
0.572
0.529
0.464
0.390
r t,..\
!
a
0.3
I
3
l0
30
Ellectivepressure.
o'(ton/ft2)log scale
Figure 10,17
Variationof void ratio with
effective Dressure
280
Votume
A y l
l l
l
i,
H
A)
v.t
A y l
Heighl
1 l
v'r, ulr,
t
l
l l L
v.
i
+
Figure 10.18 Settlementcausedby onc-dimcnsionalconsolidation
10.9
(10.18)
whcre l/,, and I/1 are the initial and final volumes,rcspectivcly.However, the change
in the total volume is equal to the changein thc volumc of voids, Atr/,,.Hence,
LV : S,A : V,s - V,,,:
LV,,
(10.19)
where /,,1;and V,,, are the initial and linal vclid volumes, rcspectively.From the
definition of void ratio. it follows that
LV,,- L,eV,
( 10.20)
v' .' :
Vu
AH
7te,,
l*er1
:'
( 10.21)
where eo : initial void ratio at volume V,,.Thus, from Eqs (10.18)through (10.21),
L V - S,A= LeV,:
S' , . : H
A.e
Ile,l
,Tr ,,O,
(r0.22)
281
',*#*'"-(4#)
(t0.24)
In overconsolidatcdclays (sce Figure 10.16), for o|, + Ao' < oj , field e-logo,
variation will be along the line hj, the slope of which will be approximately equal to
that for the laboratory rebound curve. The slclpcof the rebound curve C" is referred
to as the swell index; so
Ac : C,!og(ol1+ L,c')
logoi,,)
( lo.2s)
F r o m E q s . ( l t . l 5 ) a n d ( l J . l 8 ) ,w e o b r a i n
s.:#'.r(n#)
(10.26)
'.:ffi^r#.#r'"-(tn;*)
(10.27)
Howevcr, if the e-log rr' curve is givcn, one can simply pick Ae off the plot for the
appropriate range of pressurcs.This number may be substitutedinto Eq. (I0.22) for
t h e c a l c u l a t i o no f s e t t l e m e n t S
. ..
10.10
C":0.009(Ll*10)
(10.28)
Chapter l0
Compressibility of Soil
Index.C.*
for Compression
Table 10.4 Correlations
Equation
Regionof applicability
Reference
S k e m p t o n( 1 9 4 4 )
c, - 0.0()'7(LL 7)
C, : 0.01u,,y
C , . : l . 1 5 ( e ,-, 0 . 2 7 ) N i s h i d a( 1 9 5 6 )
Hough (1957)
C , : 0 . 3 0 ( e o- 0 . 2 7 )
C, - 0.01l5r.r.''
c,:0.0046(LL-9)
C,:0.75(co-0.-5)
C..:0.208cr2+0.0083
C, = 0.156c,,+ (.).0107
Remolded clays
Chicago clays
All clays
Inorganic cohesivcsoil: silt, silty clay,clay
Organic soils,peats,organic silt, and clay
Brazilian clays
Soils with low plasticity
Chicago clays
All clays
'kAlter Renclon-Hcrrero
( 1980)
Note:a71-- in siluvoid ratio:toa: in.rilttwatercontcnt.
l a t u r a l c l a y s ,R e n d o n - H e r r e r o( 1 9 8 3 )
O n t h c b a s i so f o b s e r v e l t i o nosn s e v e r a n
gave the rclationship for thc compressionindex in tlre form
. -/ | + c,,\23r1
c. : 0.r4lci'[ q,
)
( r0.29)
l e c o m p r e s s i o ni n d e x a s
N a g a r a ja n d M u r t y ( 1 9 u 5 )c x p r e s s e ct h
ILL(%\l
.1",
c, : 0.23431
,ou
( l0.30)
'Ihc
C,:lro*c,
( 1 0 .r3)
ILL(v"\l
c, _ {).04631
l()() ]c,
(10.32)
E xa mp l e1 0 .4
A soil profile is shownin Figure 10^19.If a uniformly diSributed load, Ao, is applied at the groundsurface,what is the settlementof theplay layercausedby priif
maryconsolidation
a. The clayis normally consolidated
pressure(oL) :190 kN/m2
b. The preconsolidation
c' o',: 170kN/m2
UseC.:IC,.
a o = 1 0 0k N / m j
{, }
Y,iry= l4 kN/ml
1' Cround water table
..-
Sand
%*r = 18 kN/m3
''','::r".
.'' : l:.: :'.'.iClay"".'.i ; " ".''
Figure 10.19
Solution
a. Theaverage
effective
stressat themiddleof theclaylayeris
ab:2Tarv
* y,o] *
-*
+ 4lTruqsonay
z4
l7sar1"roy;TrrJ
OT
o6
C"H
/ol,*Ao'1
s.:l+eo,"t(?)
i
;
^ c" 0.27
c,:;:;:0.04s
( tg.t++ 100
^ (0.04sX4)
\ =
.ros(
s :
0.036
m : 36mm
il
0*:
,q11 )
c.
o'si
ob:79.14 kN/m2
Ao':I79.14kN/m2
o ' , : 1 7 0k N / m 2
Because
vb < oL< (rb + Ao', useEq.(10.27),
C"H
s':
o'-
/ 6',, + L,o'\
C ,H
rs
'^ /
: 46.8mm
E xa mp l e1 0 .5
The laboratory consolidation data for an undisturbed clay specimen are as follows:
o't : 95kN/m2
et : l.l
oz :
ez: 0.9
4 7 5k N / m z
W h a t w i l l b e t h e v o i d r a t i o f o r a p r e s s u r eo f 6 0 0 k N / m 2 I ( N o t e :o i < 9 . 5k N / m 2 . )
-' E
,175600
,+75
95
P r e s s u r eo,' ( l o g s c a l e () k N / m l )
Figure 10.20
$olution
From Figure L0.20,
1.1- 0.9 ; :
0.286
*
logd? logdl: log
. -475 log$
-:
z : C.(log600 - log 95)
C, =
t-
: t
(t-ez
600
C l o e" =9 5
= 1.1- 0.286
log
S
: o.rt
loJ I
285
co
A,e
log 12- log r,
Ae
l"g(t/,)
( 10.3-1)
s" : clH
/t,\
'"r(.
i/
(r0.34)
Time,r (logscale)
Figure 10.21 Yariatton of e with log / under a given load increment and definition of secondary consolidation index
286
(10'3s)
c'-: Th:
Secondaryconsolidationsettlementis more important than primary consolidation in organicand highly compressibleinorganicsoils.In overconsolidatedinorganic
clays,the secondarycompressionindex is very small and of lesspracticalsignificance.
Example10.6
For a normally consolidatedclaylayerin the field, the followingvaluesare given:
r
.
r
o
r
r
What is the total consolidation settlement of the clay layer five years after the
completion of primary consolidationsettlement?(Note: Time for completion of
= 1.5years.)
primarysettlement
Solution
FromEq.(10.35),
C'* =
co
1* e,
ep :
Aepri_ury
287
CombiningEqs.( 10.22)
and (10.23).
we findrhat"
ob *
26s9,1,e70
L e: C
- , ,-rcn(
"o\
,oo' ) : o.r
)
" . - ' . ,"r" on(
\
os
2650
: 0.038
Primary
consolidatior,
s"' : ++
7*eo
(0'03qx8'lJ( 12)
: 2.15in.
l+0.8
c-a- :
o9-2,,:o.o1r
| + 0.162
s, : c"H'"r(f) = (0.011)(8.s
x 12)ros(*) = o.rn,n
Total consolidationsettlement: primary consolidation(S.) + secondarysettlement (S").So
total consolidation
settlement:2.15 + 0.59: 2.74in.
10.12
288
:"i
1
r
rj.
...
,
l
t)
Figure 10.22
(a) Claylayerundergoing
consolidation;(b) flow
of water at -4 during
consolidation
u|
dr
(b)
Figure I022b showsthe flow of water through a prismatic element at,4. For
the soil elementshown,
Rate of outflow
of water
Rate of inflow
o[ water
Rate of
volume change
Thus,
6u. \
/
lu.+:dz. l
\
3
2
/
dxdy-D.dxdy:-
av
dt
r
10.12 Time Rate of Consolidation
289
oa,
av
dx dl 'lz ;t7
7
(10.36)
k itrr
y,,.i
(10.37)
l a v
:
y,,.or.t ax ly az at
K
d-u.
( 10.38)
Duringconsolidation,
the raLeof changein the volumeof the soilelementis equal
to the rateof changcin the volurneof voids.Thus.
dv : ilv, : !Uti:y)
at
al
i)t
(r0.3e)
!!r: u
dt
and
V,
dx dv dz.
lla,,
l+e,,,
lle6
at
( 10.40)
(t-Ll
y,, oz2
(le
| + eo at
(10.41)
290
givcs
CombiningEqs.(10.a1)and(10.42)
k
0,,
i)2Lt
y,,d*:
ilu
i)tt
l+q,i:-n''
dt
where
r.t,,: coefficient of volumc compressibility a,,l(l + e7)
( 10.43)
or.
,):l :
(l- ll
dt
o1.
( 10.44)
wht:re
c , , : c c r e l l i c i c not l ' c o n s o l i d a t i o n: k l ( y , , , m , . )
(ro.4s)
Thus.
f,,tn,
( 10.46)
u,
Y"\r+c;/
z-0. rr-0
7 , : 2 1 t , 1 ,u, : 0
L t : u 1 1
/ : 0 ,
,-'TlT""(#,)1'
-M?t,
( 10.47)
wherem:anintegcr
M:Qrl2)(2m+t)
pore watel prcssure
Ilo : initial excess
r .' : : + :
Hit,
t i m ef a c l o r
(r0.48)
u- " -
' - l -
Ll-
Llo
Ll-
uo
(10.4e)
().I
O.2
0.3
291
0.'t
0.5
0.(r
O.1
I)egrec
of consolidalion.
t/-
E q u a t i o n s( l 1 . 4 l ) a n d ( 1 0 . 4 9 )c a n b e c o m b i n e d t o o b t a i n t h e d c g r e eo f c o n s o l i d a t i o na t a n y d e p t h z . T h i s i s s h o w n i n F i g u r e 1 0 . 2 3 .
The averagedcgree of consolidation for the entire depth of thc clay laycr at
a n y t i m e / c a n b e w r i t t e n f r o n t E q . ( 1 0 . 4 9 )a s
U : ?_ 1
/ r \ ftn,,,
u,dz
l.- ll
\zHd,/ Jo
ur)
( r0.s0)
,-|
'f 2-",,,
,7:r,M'
(10.-5
r)
292
b\
;20
'E
>
i:
o l
bol
r E l
.=
;,
A
=
e40
H ,
Ot,
1'., :
!
:'
l
6
ill
F F I
8180
H,r,
0..1
0.6
Tinrelactor,7',.
I
I
V
O ! Y
0.8
10.24 Yariation
with depth)
The valuesof thc time ferctorand their corrcspondingaveragedegreesof consolidation for the casepresented in Figure 10.24may also be approximated by the
following simple rclationship:
/ ttot^\2
F o r U : 0 t o 6 0 % ,' 7 , . : + ( = )
4\100/
ForIJ 7 60o/o,T, * 1.78I* 0.933log(100* U"/.)
(10.s2)
(10.s3)
Table 10.5givesthe variation of ?',,with U on the basisof Eqs. (10.52) and (10.53).
10.13
Coefficient of Consolidatio n
The coef{icientof consolidation cu generally decreasesas the liquid limit of soil increases.The range of variation of cufor a given liquid limit of soil is wide.
For a given load increment on a specimen,two graphical methods are commonly
used for determining cu from laboratory one-dimensionalconsolidation tests.The
first is the logarithm-of-time methodproposed by Casagrandeand Fadum (1940), and
the other is the square-root-of-time method given by Taylor (1942). More recently, at
least two other methods were proposed. They are the hyperbola method (Sridharan
and Prakash, 1985) and the early stagelog-t method (Robinson and Allam, 1996).The
general procedures for obtaininB cu by these methods are described in this section.
293
u (%l
0
I
2
3
1
5
6
7
6
9
l0
lt
t2
l3
l4
l-5
l6
l7
Iti
I9
20
2l
22
L-)
24
25
26
27
2u
29
30
3t
-)z
33
r"
0
0.00008
0.0003
0.00071
0.(n126
0 . 0 09I 6
0.00283
0.003u.5
0.00-502
0.00636
0.007ft.5
0.(x)9-5
0 . 0 1l 3
0 . 0 I3 3
0.01-54
0.0t77
0.0201
0.0227
0.02.54
0.02rJ3
0.03I4
0.0346
0.03t30
0.041.5
0.0452
0.0491
0.053I
0.0572
0.06l-s
0.0660
0.07('t7
0.0754
0.01103
0.08-5-5
U lo/"1
-)+
3-5
--to
37
3tt
39
40
4l
A')
43
41
4.5
46
41
4u
49
-s0
5t
)t
53
-54
-s5
56
57
5f,i
.59
60
6l
62
63
64
6.5
66
67
Tu
u(%l
T,
0.0907
0.0962
0 . 10 2
0 . 10 7
0.1l3
0 . 1l 9
0.126
0.132
0 . 13 8
0.145
0.1.52
0.t -59
0 . 16 6
0.173
0 .t t 3 l
0.I8[t
0.t97
0.204
0.212
0.221
0.230
0.239
0.24tt
0.257
0.261
0.276
0.2u6
0.291
0.307
0.3r8
0.329
0.304
0.3-52
0.364
68
69
70
7l
72
0.377
0.390
0.403
0.411
0.431
0.446
0.461
0.477
0.493
0.-51
I
0.529
0.547
0..s67
0.5t3u
0.6I0
0.633
0.65u
0.61J4
0.712
0.742
0.174
0.u09
0.t348
0.139I
0.93u
0.993
1.055
|.129
t.219
1.336
1.500
I.7ul
74
75
76
71
7t3
l()
u0
ul
82
lJ3
n4
|.i.5
u6
ti7
utt
llc)
90
9l
92
93
94
9-s
96
o?
9u
99
r(x)
a
a
E
,a
tI
t)
I5t)
-l'irne
(logscalc)
Draw a horizontal line DE such thal the verticirl distancc BD is equal tor. The
d e f o r m a t i o nc o r r c s p o n d i n gt o t h e l i n c D E i s r / , ,( t h a t i s , d c f o r m a t i o na t 0 %
consolidation
).
The clrdinatcof point f on thc consoliclationcurvc rcpresentsthe deformation
at 50% primary consolidation,and its abscissarcprcsentsthe corresponding
time (rr,,).
For -50'/oaverageclegreeof consolidation,I,, : 0.191(seeTable 10.5),so,
,,,,:E
()r
4.,, :
o.telH:t,
( 10.54)
,,
295
B C
'tr-\ I iltt(t /
Figure 10.26
Scluare-root-ol-time
fittingmethod
!+
7i,,: {).t{4tt:
fI ,,,
0.848H?t,
tgl
( 10.ss)
{
D
Figure 10.27
Hyperbolamethodfor determinationof c.,
(10s6)
c,,:03(;J
(# *)""ngth) 2
(length)2
time
/ time \
\ l e n g t h/
o.038sH:1,
( Io.-s7)
t22Jq
EI
; l
E I
E I
l
o
Figure 10.28
Early stagelog-rmethod
297
portion of the consolidation curve is taken into account, the effect of secondary consolidation plays a role in the magnitude of c,,.This fact is demonstrated for several
soils in Table 10.6.
Several investigators have also reported that the c,, value obtained from the
field is substantiallyhigher than that obtained from laboratory tests conducted by
using conventional testing methods (that is, logarithm-of-time and square-root-oftime methods). Hence, the early stage log-/ method may provide a more realistic
value of fieldwork.
Tahle 10.6 Comparisonof c,.Obtaincdfrom VariousMethods*
cu x 104 cm2/sec
Rangeof
pressureo'
(kN/m'zl
Red earth
Brown soil
lllite
Bentonite
Chicago clay
(Taylor, 1948)
25-50
-50 t(x)
t(x)-200
200- 400
400-800
25-50
50-100
100-20t)
200- 400
4(X)-U00
2-5--50
50-100
100-2(x)
200- 4(x)
400- 800
25-50
.50 I(X)
l(n-200
200-'100
400- 80t)
2-s-.50
50-100
100-200
200- 400
4(X) 800
r2.5-25
25-50
50-100
100-20t)
200-400
400- 800
800-1 600
Logarithmof-time
method
4.63
6.43
t 3 .41
u .I 0
3.13
t
3.02
2.86
2.09
1.30
5.07
3.06
2.00
l.l5
0.-56
1.66
1.34
2.20
3 .l 5
4.l-5
0.063
0.046
0.044
0.021
0.01-5
25.10
20.70
t3;70
3.18
4.56
6.0.s
'7.09
Square-rootEarly stage
of-time
method
log t method
.5.4-5
1.98
9.99
10.90
I 1.99
4.45
3.77
3.4t)
2.21
1.4-s
6.-5-5
3.69
2.50
1.57
0.64
2.25
3 .l 3
3 .l 8
,1.59
5.82
0.130
0.100
0.052
0.022
0.017
45.50
23.90
17.40
4.71
4.40
6.44
8.62
6.12
9.00
I 1.43
t2.56
t 2.ttO
).41
3.n0
3.52
2.74
t.36
9;73
4.78
-i.4)
2.03
0;79
2.50
-).)
3.6-5
5.14
6.45
0.t62
0.130
0.081
0.040
0.()22
46.00
31.-50
20.20
4.97
4.91
7.41
9.09
Example10.7
The time requiredfor 50% consolidationof a 25-mm-thickclaylayer (drainedat
both top and bottom) in the laboratoryis 2 min. 20 sec.How long (in days)will it
take for a 3-m-thickclay layer of the sameclay in the field under the samepressure incrementto reach50% consolidation?In the field, there is a rock layer at
the bottomof the clay.
Solution
('rlti.l,l
L',./loh
')rr
LJz
r r dr(lal')
flrb
u2
r, ,/rltield)
'ficld
I"l?n(,,,tu\
HtarQort)
140sec
/fi"r,r
(3 rn)t
7on2s;T:
t _ l
t
'field
8,064,000
sec : 93.33days
*-
Exa mp l e1 0 .8
Refer to Example10.7.How long (in days)will it take in the field for 30% primary
consolidationto occur?Use Eq. (10.52).
Solution
From Eq. (10.52),
crJii.t,t
:T",xlJ2
H'artlah)
So
t x(Jz
\:
t2
93.33days
T^
Ui
Ui
502
302
/e * 33.6days
2gg
Example10.9
A 3-in.-thicklayer (doubledrainage)of saturatedclayunder a surcharge
loading
underwent90% primary consolidationin 75 days.Find the coefficient
of consoli_
dation of clay for the pressurerange.
$olution
:
Tun
.,
c
"t!'
H
rd,
:
= 0.00294cm2/sec
",, s1lli?lrioo
75 x 24 x 60 x OO
Example10.10
For a normally consolidatecl
laboratoryclayspecimendrainedon both sides,the
fbllowing are given:
ni2:30001b/ft2
= e 7 1 -l . l .
o'r,* Ao' : 60001b/ft2 e : 0.g
Thicknessof clay specimen: 1 in.
Time for 50% consolidation: 2 min
a. Determinethe hydraulicconductivity(frlmin) of the clayfor the loading
range.
b. How long (in days)will it take for a 6-ft claylayerin the field (drained
on
one side)to reach60% consolidation?
Solution
Part A
The coefficientof compressibilityis
Q,,
tn..: "
7*eo.,,
/ A u \
\ G'/
1,+er,
A e = L . 1- 0 . 9 : 0 . 2
err:*_;-x1.0
:
)
300
So
0.2
3000
m,:
ffi:
3 . 3 3x 1 0 5 f t 2 / l b
Z, : 0.197;thus,
FromTable10.5,for U : 504/",
(0.1e?)
(r*)'
cu:
: 1.71x l0 4fr2lmin
x 10-sft?lb)(6z.4lbltf)
k: c.m,y,,,-(l.i\ x 10-1ft2/min)(3.33
: 3.55x l0 7ftlmin
PartB
'f
lAtr
--
, -*
t60
L- t '^rl na ,
H!,,
TnuHl,,
c.,.
10.14
{0.286)(6)l
:60.211min :41.8days
,r, *ffi
Calculation of Consolidation
Settlement under a Foundation
Chapter 9 showed that the increasein the vertical stressin soil causedby a load applied ovcr a limited area decreaseswith depth z measuredfrom the ground surface
downward. Hence to estimate the one-dimensionalsettlement of a foundation. we
can use Eq. ( lU.2a),( 10.26),or ( 10.27).However,the increaseof effectivestress,Aa',
in theseequationsshould be the averageincreasein the pressurebelow the centerof
the foundation. The valuescan be determined by using the procedure describedin
Chapter 9.
Assuming that the pressureincreasevariesparabolically,using Simpson'srule,
we can estimate the value of Aoj,,.as
LrvLu
A,rr',+4Acr'^* Ltr'6
( 10.s8)
where L,o',, Lrr',,,and Aoi, represent the increase in the effective pressure at the top,
middle, and bottom of the layer, respectively.
Ex amp l e1 0 .1 1
Calculatethe settlementof the 10-ft-thickclay layer (Figure 1A.29)that will result
from the load carried by a S-ft-squarefooting. Tire ciay-isnormaliy consolidated.
use the weightedaveragemethod [Eq. (10.5s)]to ca]culaterhe averageincrease
of effectivepressurein the clay layer.
ilr
, I+
_
DrY sand
+ '+
ydry=loopct
l
5 {t
,on
r l
eootins size
srrxiti
-*-1----
-------v-g':T1itiyy1
Sand
%at= 120 Pcf
Figure 1A.29
$olution
For normally consolidatedclay,from Eq. (70.24),
tn" :
C,,H
l+eorrg
o'0 + L,o'ou
ob
where
C. = 0.009(Lr - 10) = 0.009(40- 1.0)= g.y1
11:10X12:120in.
it
eo: 1.0
ob:
rf
$
- 62.4]+
loft x ydry(sand)
+ l0ftl7,o,1,u"d)
fgly,u,i.ruy
)- 62.4]
: l 0 x 1 0 0+ 1 0 ( t 2 0- 6 2 . 4 )+ 5 ( l t 0 - 6 2 . 4 )
: 1814lblft2
302
Lr'L,
Lo'6
b= Bl2
(ft)
(ft)
t
1
0
25
2
2
.
.
2.5
ht = zlb
8
10
cl
{kip/ft'?}
200
5 x 5
8
8
L,c' = qlt
{kip/lt'?l
t1
0.051
0.408- Aol
0.o29
0.019
0.232= Lo'^
0.152= LoL
So
LoL,:
+ 0.152
0.408+ (4)(0.232)
:
0.248kip/ft2:24Blblft2
Hence,
o.ein
t.- q1+P,o*s1r*1#:
10.15
tt
I I
t
t
t
t
brouno
-g-I|aleltlble**
'j..:".t.':.".
"'
|*t'
llqa
l
I Clav
I tuv.t
.1..
- : ,i : V , :. . - .
. . ' - , - ., '. . . :
i Sand drain;
I radius = r,n.
Hc
.t:'nu
verilcxr dralnage
Radial
drainage
:
:
Radial
(rrarnage
II
I
t
, ,Ver1!9q!.dra!ng9
Santl
(a) Scction
(b) l'lan
Figure 10.31
Sanddraininstallation
irr
progress(courtesyof E. C. Shin,
Universityof Inchon,
SouthKorea)
304
Polypropylenc
core
<jru
S;;;1J1:;J
g;j:j;;;1:g:;r
:-jj:tt;Sr:,:i
j::.:r:s:t
Ceotextile
litbric
Figure 10.33
I n t a l l a t i o no 1 ' P V D si n
progrcss(courtesyof E. C.
S h i n . l . l n i v e r s i t yo [ I n c h o n ,
SouthKorea)
prelabricatcd vertical drains (PVDs). which are also referred to as wlck or strip
tlruins, were originally developedas etsubstitutefor thc commonly used sand drain'
With the advent of msterials scicnce,these drains are manufacturedfrom synthetic
polymcrs such as polypropylene anclhigh-densitypolyethylene.PVDs are normally
manufactured with a corrugated or chernneledsyntheticcore enclosedby a geotextile filter, as shown schematicallyin Figure 10.32.lnstallation rates reported in the
literature are on the order of 0.1 to 0.3 m/s, excluding equipment mobilization and
setup time. PVDs have been used extensivelyin the past for expedientconsolidation
of low permeability soilsunder surfacesurcharge.The main advantageof PVDs over
sand diains is that they do not require drilling and, thus, installation is much faster.
Figure 10.33showsthe installation of PVDs in the field.
10.16
Problems
l0.l
ll).2
10.3 Following
arethe-'J,;jdjonsolidation test:
1.1
1.085
1.055
1.01
0.94
0.'79
0.63
0.2-5
0..5
l.t)
2.0
4.0
8.0
16.0
306
25
50
100
200
400
500
r.2l
1.195
1.1-5
1.06
0.98
0.925
10.5 A soil profile is shown in Figure 10.34.Thc uniformly distributed load on the
ground surfaceis Arr. Estimate the primary settlementof the normally consolidatedclay layer, given that
Hr:4tt,H,:6ft,H.-411
For sand,c - 0.-58,G, - 2.67
F o r c l a y ,c : l . l , G , : 2 . 1 2 .L L : 4 5
Aa - lft(X)lh/ltr
using thc following data:
10.6 Repeat Problem 10.-5,
I 11 : 2 ' 5 m ' H z : 2 ' 5 m ' H 1 : 3 r n
F o r s a n d ,a : 0 . 6 4 .G , - 2 . 6 5
F o r c l a y ,c - 0 . 9 ,G , - 2 . 7 5 ,L L : 5 5
A t r - 1 0 0k N i m r
using the l'ollowingdata:
10.7 Repeat Problem 10.-5,
A r r - 9 ( )k N / n r r
I I ' : 2 m ' I 1 2: 2 m ' I I l : l " 5 m
F o r s a n d . 7 , 1 ,-u 1 4 . 6k N / m r , y , , , r : 1 7 . 3k N / m l
F o r c l a y , 7 , u ,: 1 9 . - k1N / m r . L L : 3 8 , e - 0 ' 1 5
t
t
:!:]:;:;ill:.]:il;ni::i..-
A o r
I
II
I
Sand
Figure 10.34
Problems
1 1 1
: : : 1 : : : :: [ : '
Dry sand
e=0.6
C,=2.65
l0 fr
I
""- -f "t
y Croundwater tabfe
Sand
e=0.6
I
l0 ft
Figure 10.35
10.8 A soil profile is shown in Figure 10.35.The preconsolidationpressureof the
clay is 3400 lb/ft2. Estimate the primary consolidationsettlementthat will
take place as the result of a surchargeequal to2200 lb/ft2. Assume C. : JC,.
10.9 Refer to Problem 10.6.Given that c,, : 2.8 X 10 6 m2/min,how long will it
take for 60% primary consolidationto take place'?
10.10 The coordinatesof two points on a virgin compressioncurve are as follows:
er : l.lt2
u ' t - 2 0 0k N / m 2
c;
1.54
o'2 = 400 kN/m2
a. Determine the coefficientof volume compressibilityfor the pressure
range stated above.
b. Given that c,, : ().003cmr/sec,determine k in cm/seccorrespondingto the
averagevoid ratio.
10.11 For the virgin curve stated in Problem 10.10,what would be the effective
pressureo' correspondingto e : 7.7?
10.12 For the virgin curve stated in Problem 10.10,what would be the void ratio
corresponding to an effective pressure o' that is equal to 500 kN/m2?
10.13 Following are the relationships of e and o' for a clay soil:
e
r' (ton/ft2l
1.0
0.9'7
0.8-5
o.'75
0.2
0.5
1.8
3.2
For this clay soil in the field, the following values are given: H : 4.5 ft, o'u :
0.1 tonlft2,ando6 * Ao' :2tonlft2. Calculatethe expectedsettlement
caused by primary consolidation.
10.14 During a laboratory consolidation test, the time and dial gauge readings obtained from an increase in pressure on the specimen from 50 to 100 kN/m2
are given in the following table:
308
Time
(min)
0
0.10
0.25
0.60
1.0
2.0
4.0
8.0
Dial gauge
reading
(mm)
3.98
4.08
4.10
4.13
4.r7
/ 1 1
4.30
4.42
Time
(min)
16.t)
30.0
60.0
120.0
240.0
480.0
960.0
t440.0
Dial gauge
reading
(mm)
4.57
4.74
4.92
5.08
-s.2I
5.28
5.33
5.39
a. Find the time for 50% primary consolidation (rr,,)using the logarithm-oftime method.
b. Find the time for 90% primary consolidation (rr,,)using the square-rootof-time method.
c. If the averageheight of the specimenduring consolidationcausedby this
incremental loading was22 mm and it was drained at both the top and the
bottom, calculatethe coefficientof consolidation using /r,,and /r,,obtained
from parts (a) and (b).
10.15 Refer to the laboratory tcst rcsults givcn in Problem 10.14. Using the hyperbola method, determine r:,..The averageheight of the spccimenduring consolidation was22 mm, and it was drained at the top and bottom.
10.16 The time for 50% consolidationof a 2-5-mm-thickclay layer (drained at top
and bottom) in the laboratory is l-50sec.How long (in days) will it take for a
3-m-thick laycr of thc samc clay in the field under the same pressureincrement to reach 50% consolidation'lThere is a rock layer at the bottom of the
clay in the field.
10.17 For a normally consolidatedclay,the following valuesare given:
( - (.- l.2l
o',t:2 ttln/ftr
6',,1 L.rr' 4 trln/l't2 r, - 0.96
The hydraulic conductivity k of the clay for the precedingloading range is
1 . 8 x 1 0 - 4f t l d a y .
a. How long (in days) will it take for a 9-ft-thick clay layer (drained on one
side) in the held to reach 60% consolidation'?
b. What is the settlementat that time (i.e.,at 60"/"consolidation)?
10.18 A 1O-ft-thicklayer (two-way drainage) of saturatedclay under a surcharge
loading underwent 90% primary consolidationin 100 days.
a. Find the coefficient of consolidation of clay for the pressure range.
b. For a 1-in-thick undisturbedclay specimen,how long will it take to
undergo 90% consolidationin the laboratory for a similar consolidation
pressure range? The laboratory tests'sspecimen will have two-way
drainage.
L0.19 Laboratory tests on a 25-mm-thick clay specimen drained at the top only
show 50% consolidationtakes place in 11 min.
a. How long will it take for a similar clay layer in the field, 4 m thick and
drained at the top and bottom, to undergo 50% consolidation?
b. Find the time required for the clay layer in the field, as described in part
(a), to reach 10"/" consolidation.
References
309
Load = 0
I
I
V
!r.
:.'
Sand
%at' l8 kf{/lu3
Sand
References
Cnsecn'rNoe, A. (1936). "Determination of the PreconsolidationLoad and Its Practical
Significance." Proceedings,1st International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering,Cambridge, Mass.,Vol. 3, 60-64.
casac;naNoE, A. and Faouv, R. E. (1940). "Notes on Soil resting for Engineering purposes," Harvard University Graduate School of Engineering publication No. 8.
Houcs, B. K. (19-57).Basic SctilsEngineering, Ronald Press,New york.
MavNE, P. w., and Pour-os, H. G. (1999). "Approximate Displacement Influence Factors for
Elastic Shallow Foundations," Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,ASCE, Vol. 125,No. 6, 453-460.
310
316-320.
S c n r E t c r s p R , F . ( 1 9 2 6 ) . " Z u r T h e o r i e d e s B a u g r u n d e s ,B" u u i n g , e n i e u r , Y o l . T . 9 3 l - 9 3 5 , 9 4 9 952.
ScHvEnrnrnNN, J. H. (1953). "Undisturbed Consolidation Behavior of Clay," Transactions,
A S C E , V o l . 1 2 0 ,1 2 0 1 .
Sre naproN, A. W ( 1944). "Notes on the Comprcssibility of Clays." Quarterly Jotrrnal of the
Geological Society o.f'London, Vol. 100, I 19-13-5.
SRIosa.RaN,A., and PnRrnsu, K. (1985). "Improved Rcctangular Hyperbola Method for
the Determination of Cocfficient of Consolidalion," Geotechnical Testing Journal,
ASTM. Vol.8, No. 1,37-40.
'frryr-on,
D. W. (1942)."Research on Consolid:rtionof Clays," Serial No.82, Department of
Civil and Sanitary Engincering, Massachusettslnstitute of Technology, Cambridge,
Mass.
TnyLon, D. W. ( l94u). Fundamentals of Soil Mechanlcl, Wiley, New York.
TI-:Rz-I.<;tl, K. (192-5). Erdbattmechanik auf Bodenphysikalischer Grundlager, Deuticke,
Vienn:r.
T'enz-ncur, K., and Pr,.crc,R. B. (1967). Soil Mechanicsin EnginaeringPructice,2ndcd., Wiley, New York.