Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Tracking Students Research Paper
Tracking Students Research Paper
Katelynn Ogunfolami
Abstract: Tracking is currently used in
Trackinghasshownusthatstudentsare
unevenlydistributedamongtracks.Withlowincome
andminoritystudentsmorelikelytobeinlowability
classesforthenoncollegebound.Thistheoryhas
beenbackedbytechnical/structuralfactors,cultural
norms,andunderstanding.Although,overalllittleis
stillknownabouthowhighschoolsdecidewhat
classestoofferandhowtoplacestudentsinthe
correctclasses.However,wedoknowthateven
thoughtheideaoftrackingiswellthoughttheeffects
ontheseminoritystudentsarecripplingtotheir
futures.Ithasbeenthoughthatschooltrackingis
maintainingasocietythatiscontinuouslyclassified
byraceandsocialclass.Letsthingofeachdifferent
curriculumopportunityastheequivalentof
occupationalopportunitiesinalargersociety;which
inawayitis.
Tangible indications. Manystudies
havebeenamassedandevaluated.Intheendthese
studieshaveshownthatsortingstudentby
achievementlevelexposesminorityandpoor
studentstolowerqualityteachersandlessresourced
classmates(Chambers,2009).Thisstrengthensthe
argumentthatthereareraciallyidentifiablecourse
enrollmentpatterns.Studentswithbetter
opportunitiesareplacedinthesehigher
advancementclasseswhiletheirpeers,whoarejust
astalentedarepunishedfortheirhomelife,social
standing,andethnicity.Manystudentstothisday
continuetoshowthattrackinghasadeleteriouseffect
onthelearningofstudents;althoughtracking
continuestobeused.Inrecentyearstrackingisbeing
characterizedasthemostimportantsecond
generationsegregationissue(Chambers,2009).
Organization
Theeffectivenessoftrackingalsodepends
inparttohowitisorganized,whichisthrough
structureandoverallimpact.
AsdefinedbyAageB.Srensen,thereare
fourmainstructuresofthetrackingsystem:
selectivity,electivity,inclusiveness,andscope.
Selectivityisinregardtotheamountofsimilarity
createdbygroupingstudentsaccordingto
characteristicsrelevanttolearning.Electivityisused
toseetheextentatwhichstudentschooseorare
assignedatrack.Inclusivenessideallyisusedtosee
whatleavesstudentsopentooptionsforfuture
schooling.Trackingisinclusiveifitassigns
relativelymorestudentstocollegeprep
classes/trackswhichunfortunatelywearenotseeing.
Lastly,scopeisusedtomeasuretheextenttowhich
studentsarelocatedinthesametracksacross
subjects.Generally,throughthesestructuresof
trackingwecanseethattrackingaffectsthe
dispersionofachievementandcreateseducational
inequality.Sincetrackingvariesfromschoolto
schoolwhatifsomeformsoftrackinginducemore
inequalitybetweentracksthanothers?Thatthe
questioneducatorsandresearchesarestilllookingto
answerastomakesurestudentsofallspectrumscan
beinfittingtracksthatwillinturnleadtotheirfuture
success.
Onasimilarnote,thiscompetitionand
motivationispossiblebecausetrackingservesto
retainhigherabilitystudentsinmorefitting
classrooms.Inthisgroupingofstudents,theyare
betterabletofocusoncurriculumwithouthavingto
bebotheredbytheminisculebutdisruptive
variablesthatoccurinclasseswithstudentsofall
learninglevelsandabilities.
learnnewlearningskillsandcontinuetohavethat
mentalstimulationthatleadstosuccess.
Intheendweneedtofocusonhelpingall
studentsbesuccessful,teachersandeducatorsneedto
betheeyesandearsthathelpredefinetheway
trackingisorganizedanddone.Thatwaystudentsare
bestabletosucceednomattewhatethnicityorsocial
standingtheyhold.Astimeschange,onethingwill
remainthesamethehardworkandeffortputforth
byteacherstohelpstudentssucceedandbe
successfulintheiracademiclives.Itstimeto
redefinethewaystudentslearnandthewaytracking
isimplemented.Itstimetomakesurethatall
studentsarebeingabletobetterthemselves!
References
Oakes, J., & Guiton, G. (1995).
Matchmaking:
The dynamics of high school tracking
decisions. American Educational
Research Journal, 32(1), 3-33.
Hanushek, E. A., Kain, J. F., Markman, J. M.,
&