Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 30

Leak Detection

Performance
Pipeline Safety Trust Conference
November 17 & 18, 2011
New Orleans, Louisiana

Why Leak
Detection?

Why Leak Detection?

Minimize the volume of lost fluid

Reduce risk of fire, explosion or other safety hazards

Protect the company

Minimize cleanup costs with an early response to a leak


warning

Protect reputation

(Contd)

Demonstrable acceptance of responsibility by executing


a proactive leak detection program

Always increasing regulatory interest in pipeline


integrity programs; including leak detection

November 17 & 18, 2011

Pipeline Safety Trust


2011 Pipeline Safety Conference

History

Manual pressure/flow readings and evaluation


Voice communication between the field and any

center of responsibility that may exist, or with


other stations along the line

Familiarity with the pipeline behavior by

controllers and technicians was critical

Right-of-way observation including walk-overs and

fly-overs were among few leak detection options

November 17 & 18, 2011

Pipeline Safety Trust


2011 Pipeline Safety Conference

Automated Measurements

Proprietary logging systems and SCADA


Transmitter and meter technology
Automation tools and products that acquire

accurate information about hydraulic behavior

Tools to assist in evaluating the relationships

among measurements

November 17 & 18, 2011

Pipeline Safety Trust


2011 Pipeline Safety Conference

Leak Detection
Performance

From the former API 1155 (Evaluation Methodology for


Software Based Leak Detection Systems):

The system correctly indicates that there is no leak

The system correctly indicates that there is a leak

The system incorrectly indicates that there is a leak


(false alarm)

The system incorrectly indicates that there is no leak


(failure to detect)

Definitions absorbed into API RP-1130 (Computational


Pipeline Monitoring for Liquid Pipelines)

November 17 & 18, 2011

Pipeline Safety Trust 2011 Pipeline


Safety Conference

Performance Metrics

Sensitivity Combination of the size of a


detectable leak and the time required to detect it

Reliability A measure of the systems ability to


accurately assess whether a leak exists or not

Accuracy The ability of a system to estimate leak


parameters such as leak flow rate, total volume
lost, and leak location

Robustness The ability of a system to continue to


function during unusual hydraulic conditions or
when data is compromised

November 17 & 18, 2011

Pipeline Safety Trust


2011 Pipeline Safety Conference

Meter-Based Leak
Detection

Most widely used method on long haul pipelines


Requires meters at all entry and exit points
Achievable sensitivity limited by meter accuracy
Some methods can be implemented in SCADA; or are
options with SCADA products
Some products are stand-alone and driven by SCADA data
Alarm thresholds must tolerate and expect the imbalance
in meter readings as the line packs and unpacks
Leak evaluation algorithms that correlate actual changes
in linepack with meter imbalance provide the best
performance

November 17 & 18, 2011

Pipeline Safety Trust


2011 Pipeline Safety Conference

API 1149 Performance


Predictions

Predicts the theoretical best performance possible


with configured uncertainties

No margin for false alarm prevention

Temperature uncertainty and related changes in


density during transit is largest influence on
performance

Not uncertainty in measurement, but uncertainty in


temperature profile along the line

One type of leak detection system can more accurately


estimate the temperature profile than other systems

November 17 & 18, 2011

Pipeline Safety Trust


2011 Pipeline Safety Conference

Definitions

Dry Volume Volume of the pipeline at atmospheric


pressure and a reference temperature

Linepack The incremental quantity of fluid in the line


in addition to the dry volume influenced by pressure
and fluid temperature

Linepack is heavily influenced by temperatures effect on


fluid density as is pressure, but often to a lesser degree

Profile Value of a parameter over the length of the


pipeline segment

November 17 & 18, 2011

10

Pipeline Safety Trust


2011 Pipeline Safety Conference

Definitions (cont)
Uncertainty Potential error in measurements that

must be expected and accounted for; also the


degree to which something is unknown and must
be estimated or assumed based on somewhat
related measurements.
Real-Time Transient Model (RTTM) Accurately

tracks fluid temperature/density profiles with


consideration of pressure in order to reduce
uncertainty in the linepack
November 17 & 18, 2011

11

Pipeline Safety Trust


2011 Pipeline Safety Conference

Meter Quality vs.


Performance

November 17 & 18, 2011

12

Pipeline Safety Trust


2011 Pipeline Safety Conference

Meter-Based Leak Basics

Flow/Pressure/Temperature measurements only at


segment end-points

Metered flow accuracy important for high sensitivity

Fluid density (molecules/mass per unit volume)


varies significantly with temperature

Warm fluid is less dense; Cold fluid is more dense

Temperature/density profile uncertainty is the most


limiting factor in leak detection for some pipelines

November 17 & 18, 2011

13

Pipeline Safety Trust


2011 Pipeline Safety Conference

Volumetric Flow
Measurement

Benefits of volumetric (not corrected for temperature


and pressure) flow measurement

Barrel-to-barrel assessment tolerates differences in


density at injection and delivery points

Tolerates switching injection sources of different


temperatures

Useful on short lines with small changes in


temperature/density during transmission

Not useful where temperature/density profiles are


significant due to heat loss

November 17 & 18, 2011

14

Pipeline Safety Trust


2011 Pipeline Safety Conference

Net barrel Flow


Measurement
Benefits of net (corrected for temperature and

pressure) flow measurement

Useful for custody transfer

Under steady-state conditions, fluid injected at lower


density will balance with delivered fluid at higher
density

Injections at slightly higher volumetric flow balances


with deliveries at lower volumetric flow

Assumes a stable temperature/density profile

November 17 & 18, 2011

15

Pipeline Safety Trust


2011 Pipeline Safety Conference

Net Flow Measurement


Issues

Transient conditions thwart many algorithms


involving net flow measurements

Line packing and unpacking still result in an apparent


net flow imbalance as with basic volume balance
methods

Net barrel flow measurements aggravate simple


balance algorithms where a difference in density
exists at injection and delivery points except under
steady-state stable conditions

November 17 & 18, 2011

16

Pipeline Safety Trust


2011 Pipeline Safety Conference

Natural Flow Imbalance

Difference in injected fluid density and delivered

fluid density

Gradual change in fluid density during transit

Temperature/density profiles are poorly

understood by most simple algorithms

Profile changes shape with changes in flow rate

Water crossings and occasionally wet soil increase


thermal conductivity

November 17 & 18, 2011

17

Pipeline Safety Trust


2011 Pipeline Safety Conference

Meter-Based Leak Detection


Limitations

Accounting for changes or disturbances in linepack

Operational changes causes the line to pack or


unpack as a normal occurrence

Short-term hydraulic disturbances (transients),


including changes in injection temperatures, and their
effect on linepack must be tolerated or understood in
short-term evaluation algorithms used in rapid
assessments

Over extended periods any effects of transients are


diluted; thus allowing good sensitivity by most meterbased solutions over long observation intervals

November 17 & 18, 2011

18

Pipeline Safety Trust


2011 Pipeline Safety Conference

Key Concepts
Pressures and temperatures under steady-state

conditions provide current linepack characteristics


Divergence of meter readings (greater imbalance) should
be reflected in linepack changes as seen in pressures
Transients disturb this information and can lead to
significant short-term linepack uncertainty
Over long time intervals any observed variations in
linepack become insignificant compared to the quantity
of fluid passing through the pipeline system
Long-term sensitivity settings do not require as much
tolerance of linepack uncertainty as do short term leak
detection thresholds

November 17 & 18, 2011

19

Pipeline Safety Trust


2011 Pipeline Safety Conference

Linepack Estimation

Fluid density assumed to be an average of injection


and delivery density

Weighted average

Custom algorithms for curve fitting

RTTM thermal models track fluid density along the


line

Change in flow rate alters the temperature/density


profile as a new quiescent state develops

November 17 & 18, 2011

20

Pipeline Safety Trust


2011 Pipeline Safety Conference

Profiles

Temperature

Occurs when injection and delivery temperatures differ

Subject to heat transfer characteristics of environment

Varies with flow rate / transit time

Pressure

Varies as batched fluids of different characteristics travel

Varies as batches of different densities travel over mountains

Profiles are accurately tracked by Real-Time Transient


Models

November 17 & 18, 2011

21

Pipeline Safety Trust 2011 Pipeline


Safety Conference

Real-Time Transient Model

Most sophisticated volume/mass balance tool

Includes a thermal model to increase the accuracy of


linepack evaluation, thus allowing a shorter detection time
for a detectible leak

Tracks heat transfer along the line and develops accurate


temperature/density profiles as step changes in flow rates
or injection temperatures occur

Allows thermal model tuning to achieve the best


performance by modeling the hydraulic behavior accurately

Automatic tuning capabilities

Instrument sanity checking

November 17 & 18, 2011

22

Pipeline Safety Trust


2011 Pipeline Safety Conference

RTTM Myths

Software is expensive

Not significantly more expensive

Software requires special skills

Training and full technical support is offered by vendors

Knowledge of the pipeline physical details is needed

Software requires ongoing maintenance

Not needed, once performance is satisfactory, but


further tuning is often performed to continually improve
performance

Required if the pipeline network is changed

November 17 & 18, 2011

23

Pipeline Safety Trust


2011 Pipeline Safety Conference

Static Pressure Testing

Extremely high sensitivity


Zero (0) flow results in zero (0) uncertainty in flow

measurement
Works well in a relatively incompressible liquid

environment
Requires pressure control equipment

November 17 & 18, 2011

24

Pipeline Safety Trust


2011 Pipeline Safety Conference

Static Pressure Testing


(contd)
Shut in under pressure at near operating pressure

Monitor pressure decay for a period of time

Drop pressure by half

Monitor pressure decay for a period of time

A consistent pressure decay rate indicates


decreasing density due to heat transfer

A different pressure decay rate indicates a leak


whose rate is pressure dependent

November 17 & 18, 2011

25

Pipeline Safety Trust


2011 Pipeline Safety Conference

Static Pressure Test Trends

November 17 & 18, 2011

26

Pipeline Safety Trust


2011 Pipeline Safety Conference

Conclusion

Simple linepack assessment algorithms have a place


where linepack is stable and linepack variations and
uncertainty do not adversely affect leak assessment

RTTM technology significantly reduces linepack


uncertainty in transient environments and enables leak
detection approaching the limits imposed by meter
accuracy

Static pressure testing is a useful integrity verification tool

Matching the proper tool to the pipelines operation is


critical

November 17 & 18, 2011

27

Pipeline Safety Trust


2011 Pipeline Safety Conference

Training & Response

A critical component of any pipeline integrity


management program

Response protocol should be included in training and


be enforced

Controller can shut down the line on any suspicion of a


leak
Details regarding actions, reporting, etc.
No internal penalty for reasonable judgment

A culture focused on pipeline integrity management is


critical

November 17 & 18, 2011

28

Pipeline Safety Trust


2011 Pipeline Safety Conference

References

API 1130 Computational Pipeline Monitoring for Liquid


Pipelines

API 1149 Pipeline Variable Uncertainties and Their Effects on


Leak Detectability

API 1161 Guidance Document for the Qualification of Pipeline


Personnel

49 CFR Part 192 - TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER


GAS BY PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS

49 CFR Part 195 - TRANSPORTATION OF HAZARDOUS LIQUIDS


BY PIPELINE

November 17 & 18, 2011

29

Pipeline Safety Trust


2011 Pipeline Safety Conference

Contact UTSI
UTSI - U.S. Headquarters

UTSI - Europe

1560 West Bay Area Boulevard


Suite 300
Friendswood, Texas USA 77546

Raimundo Fernandez Villaverde 43,


6L
28003 Madrid, Spain

Telephone:
+1 281 480
8786
Fax:
+1 281 480 8008
Email:
info@utsi.com
WWW:
http://www.utsi.com

Telephone:
+34 (91) 534 07
49
Fax:
+34 (91) 535 42
57
Email:
info@utsi.com
WWW:
http://www.utsi.com

Daniel W. Nagala (
dnagala@utsi.com)
President & CEO

November 17 & 18, 2011

Catalina Frey (cfrey@utsi.com)


Senior Consultant
Pipeline Safety Trust

30

2011 Pipeline Safety Conference

You might also like