The document appears to be a rubric for grading student presentations. It evaluates presentations on spelling and grammar mistakes, clarity of speech, eye contact with the audience, colorfulness and organization of visual aids, and inclusion of required components. Points are awarded on a scale of 1 to 3 based on these criteria, with 3 being the highest score for fewest errors and best presentation skills.
The document appears to be a rubric for grading student presentations. It evaluates presentations on spelling and grammar mistakes, clarity of speech, eye contact with the audience, colorfulness and organization of visual aids, and inclusion of required components. Points are awarded on a scale of 1 to 3 based on these criteria, with 3 being the highest score for fewest errors and best presentation skills.
The document appears to be a rubric for grading student presentations. It evaluates presentations on spelling and grammar mistakes, clarity of speech, eye contact with the audience, colorfulness and organization of visual aids, and inclusion of required components. Points are awarded on a scale of 1 to 3 based on these criteria, with 3 being the highest score for fewest errors and best presentation skills.
and/or grammar mistakes on poster. Clear and able to hear from all sides of the room. Students made eye contact with the audience.
3-5 spelling mistakes
and/or grammar mistakes on poster. Somewhat clear in speech and able to hear from all sides of the room. Some eye contact was made with the audience. Poster was colorful, somewhat organized, and had most components from the worksheet.
More than 5 spelling
and/or grammar mistakes on poster. Not clear in their speech and not able to hear from all sides of the room. Little to no eye contact was made with the audience. Poster was somewhat colorful, not organized, and few components from the worksheet.
Poster was colorful,
organized, and had all components from the worksheet.