Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

GRADING RUBRIC FOR ADVANCED ELECTROCHEMISTRY (CHM674) WRITTEN REPORT (15%)

Items

Weightage
(%)
1

Objective
2
Introduction
2
Procedure
3
Data/Results
5
Discussion /
Calculations
+ Questions

Marks
2
Included all experiments done
but objective is not clear (0.5)
Background informations on
the topic are stated but in
unclear manner. Definitions of
terms are not included or poor.
(1.0)
Missing procedure with no
grammatical mistakes. (1.0)
Consistent data/results with
suspected errors. (1.5)
Data and calculations are
poorly summarized or little or
no explanations of the results.
Errors are poor or not stated. A
few of the Questions are
correctly answered. (2.5)

Does not include


fulfilling the objective
and what was learned
from the experiment.
(0.25)

Fulfilled the objective of the


experiment and what was
learned from the experiment.
(0.5)

One reference taken


from lecture notes.

One reference quoted from


other text or journals. (0.5)

Conclusion

References

1
Objective is not clear
and has some parts
missing (0.25)
Missing background
informations on the
topic or informations
given are not related to
the topic (0.5)
Missing procedure with
some grammatical
mistakes. (0.5)
Inconsistent data/results
with suspected errors
(0.75)
Only data and
calculations are
summarized or only
sources of errors and
questions are not
answered. (1.25)

3
Objective is clear but
some parts are missing
(0.75)
Background informations
on the topics are clearly
stated but insufficient.
(1.5)

4
Objective is clear (1)

Complete procedure with


some grammatical
mistakes. (1.5)
Acceptable data/results as
required (2.25)

Complete procedure with no


grammatical mistakes (2.0)

Accurate summary of data


and calculations are
included with some
explanations of the
results. Possible sources
for error are poor or not
stated. Some of the
questions are answered
correctly. (3.75)
Provides whether the
objectives of the
experiments were
fulfilled and what was
learned from the
experiment and what they
would do differently.
(0.75)
Two references used
(0.75)

Background informations on
the topic are clearly stated.
Important terms are defined.
(2.0)

Acceptable data/results with


extra effort to obtain data.
(3.0)
Accurate summary of data
and calculations are included
with explanations of the
results. Possible sources for
error are also included. All
questions are correctly
answered.(5.0)
Provides whether the
objectives of the experiment
were fulfilled, what was
learned from the experiment
and what would be done for
future work investigations.
(1.0)
More than two references
used (1.0)

Total
15%)

(0.25)

You might also like