Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Sports Blackout Rules Today Final
The Sports Blackout Rules Today Final
COMM440-01
with sports leagues and events, where cable and satellite providers are prohibited
from airing events that have been blacked out in certain media market through rules
implemented by the Federal Communications Commission. Recently, the
Commission chose to repeal its sports blackout rules however, sports leagues may
also opt to implement their own private blackout policies through contractual
arrangements with programming distributors. The rules were made to ensure the
continued availability of sports telecasts to the public. Perhaps the most widely
known blackout rules implemented privately by a sports league are those of the
National Football League (NFL) followed by Major League Baseball (MLB) and the
National Hockey League (NHL).
The rationale of the FCCs past blackout rules, originally adopted nearly 40
years ago when ticket sales were the main source of revenue for sports leagues, was
within their designated markets. However, in line with recent changes in the sports
industry, the FCC participated in an investigation into the main sources of revenue
for the NFL. The research yielded results that exposed the recent increase in
television revenues that in return, replaced gate receipts as the main income driver
for the NFL 1. Due to changes in the main source of revenue for the NFL and most
other leagues, FCC commissioner Mignon L Clyburn stated in the publicly released
full notice of the proposed rulemaking that elimination of our sports blackout rules
will not prevent the sports leagues, broadcasters, and cable and satellite providers
from privately negotiating agreements to black out certain sports events. 2
The history behind the Commissions sports blackout rules begins with the
Constitution and Bylaws of the National Football League in 1953. According to the
Commissions 2013 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Sports Blackout Rules 3, the
bylaws prohibited member teams from, among other things, (i) telecasting their
games into the home territory of another team that was playing at home, and (ii)
telecasting their games into the home territory of another team that was playing
away from home and was telecasting its game into its home territory. With these
rules in mind, a federal court held that the NFLs prohibition on the telecast of
outside games into the home territory 4 of a team that was playing at home was held
a reasonable method of protecting the home teams gate receipts and was not illegal
under the antitrust laws. However, the court also found that restricting the telecast
of outside games into the home territory of a team not playing at home was an
Ingraham, N. (2013, December 18). FCC officially proposes removing its 40-yearold sports blackout rules.
2 Federal Communications Commission, In the Matter of Sports Blackout Rules,
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 13-162, MB Doc. No. 12-3 (2013).
3 Id.
4U.S. v. National Football League et al., 116 F.Supp. 319, 321 (E.D. Pa., 1953) (U.S. v.
NFL I). Home territory is defined in the NFLs bylaws as the city in which [a] club
is located and for which it holds a franchise and plays its home games and includes
the surrounding territory to the extent of 75 miles in every direction from the
exterior corporate limits of such city. See Constitution and Bylaws of the National
Football League (Eff. Feb. 1, 1970, 2006 Rev.)
1
unreasonable restraint on trade due to the fact that when the home team was away,
there was no gate to protect.
Jumping ahead a few years to 1961, the NFL contracted an agreement with
the CBS television network under which the NFLs member teams authorized the
league to pool together and sell the rights of their games to the network as a
package. Then, the revenue from the league sales was to be distributed equally
among the member teams. In addition, under this agreement, CBS was permitted to
regulate which games would be televised and where they would be televised.
However, the NFL later petitioned the court for a ruling to determine whether or not
the terms of the contract with CBS violated the final judgment of the 1953 federal
court. The court held that the provision giving CBS the power to select which games
would be televised and the locations of the telecast was contrary to the 1952 final
judgment. 5 Therefore, the execution and performance of the contract was void. Yet,
this ruling did not apply to a similar contract between the newly formed American
Football League (AFL) and the ABC television network. The AFL was not a party to
the courts 1953 final judgment therefore, not affected. 6
With the newly formed AFL competing with the NFL, the NFL became
concerned that the courts ruling was placing them at a clear disadvantage. The NFL
argued that, packaged network contract were desirable because they allowed for
the member teams to negotiate for the sale of television rights with a single voice
U.S. v. National Football League et al, 196 F.Supp. 445 (E.D. Pa 1961)
Federal Communications Commission, In the Matter of Sports Blackout Rules,
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking FCC 13-162, MB Doc. No. 12-3 (2013).
5
6
and equalized revenue among the member teams. 7 With this in mind, the NFL
The response of Congress to the NFLs plea for relief was a passage of the
Sports Broadcasting Act of 1961, where it, exempts from the antitrust laws joint
agreements among individual teams engaged in professional football, baseball,
basketball, or hockey that permit the leagues to pool the individual teams television
rights and sell those rights as a package. 8 In addition, this statute also expressly
permits the four professional sports leagues to black out television broadcasts of
home games within the home territory of a member team. When the Sports
stability of the leagues by assuring equal distribution of revenues among all teams.
In addition, the NFL instituted a practice of blacking out the television broadcast of
all home games of its member teams in their home territory, regardless of whether
the games were sold out. 9
Ten years later, the Commission referenced the professional sports leagues
exemptions from the antitrust laws in a 1971 letter sent to Congress that sought
sports programming. The Commission expressed concern that the cable systems
should not be permitted to circumvent the purpose of this law by importing the
signal of a station carrying the home game of a professional team if that team has
elected to black out the game in its home territory. 10
rulemaking proceeding, Congress enacted Public Law 93-107 11, that added a new
Section 331 to the Communications Act of 1934. In doing so, it prohibited
professional sports leagues from blacking out the television broadcast of a home
game in a teams home territory if the game was televised elsewhere pursuant to a
league television contract and the game sold out 72 hours in advance of game
time. 12 It was enacted in response to complaints from dissatisfied football fans that
were unable to watch the sold out home games of their local teams on public
airwaves due to the NFLs private blackout policy. Public Law 93-107 was applied
to all four major professional sports leagues; however, the statute was
mainly intended as a limited experiment to allow those affected to assess the impact
of the statute. It expired December 31, 1975 and was not renewed. However, the
NFL subsequently continued to follow the practice of blacking out the telecast of
home games in a teams home territory only if the game was not sold out 72 hours in
advance of game time.
The Telecommunications Act of 1996 added a new Section 653. The revision
of Section 653 sought to establish a new framework for entry into the distribution
market of the new world of video programming. In return, Section 653 now
directed the Commission to extend the rules of sports blackouts to the distribution
of video programming over open video system. An open video system is defined as,
a facility that consists of a set of transmission paths and associated signal
rules in 1996 to directly apply the existing cable sports blackout rules to open video
systems. 14
sports blackout rule for satellite carriers that provided, by the request of the holder
of the rights to a sports event, a satellite carrier may not retransmit a national
distributed superstation 15 or a network station 16 carrying the live television
broadcast of the sports event to subscribers if the event is not being carried live by a
local television broadcast station.
Advancing ahead, the Commission last examined the sports blackout rules
more than ten years ago, in 2005. In a report to Congress required by the Satellite
Home Viewer Extension and Reauthorization Act of 2004 (SHVERA), it directed the
exclusivity, and sports blackout rules, including the impact of those rules on the
ability of rural cable operators to compete with direct broadcast satellite (DBS)
industry in the provision of digital broadcast television signals to consumers. 17
changes relating to rules the Commissions may deem appropriate. In its conclusion
of the report, the Commission stated that the sports blackout rules do not affect
competition between Multichannel Video Programming Distribution Services
seek to comment on how each of those interpretations would affect the industry and
consumers. 18 The Act defines MVPD as, [A] person such as, but not limited to, a
cable operator, a multichannel multipoint distribution service, a direct broadcast
satellite service, or a television receive-only satellite program distributor, who
Shortly after SHVERA, the Satellite Television Extension and Localism Act of
statutory regime, the STELA requires the Commission, within 270 days after the
date of its February 27, 2010 enactment 21, to develop and prescribe by rule a pointto-point predictive model for reliably and presumptively determining the ability of
10
means for reliably and presumptively determining whether the over-the-air signals
of televisions stations, including low power stations, can be received at individual
locations for purposes of establishing the eligibility of individual households to
receive the signals of distant televisions broadcast network stations from their
Measurement Standards for Digital Television Signals Pursuant to the Satellite Home
Viewer Extension and Reauthorization Act of 2004, the Commission stated, we
believe that the proposed predictive model, which is based on the current model for
predicting the intensity of analog television signals at individual locations, will allow
such determinations to be made in a timely and cost effective manner for all parties
MVPDs and television broadcast stations, and the exclusive contract prohibition
11
broadcast station from limiting the ability of an MVPD to carry into its local market
television signals that are deemed significantly viewed or that otherwise are
the sports leagues or individual teams to be blacked out on local televisions stations.
Recently, the Commission proposed to eliminate the sports blackout rules
due to the drastic changes in the sports industry in the last four decades, mainly
dealing with the switch of the leagues central income avenue. The proposal dealt
House Report 113-518 STELA Reauthorization Act Of 2014
Under current law, cable operators are not permitted to drop broadcast signals
during the weeks when Nielsen Media Research does its major audience
measurements (so called ``sweeps'' weeks). This ensures broadcasters' carriage on
cable systems during the time when Nielsen measures audiences, ensuring that a
retransmission consent dispute does not impact Nielsen ratings and thus
advertising rates.
23
24
with the elimination of the sports blackout rules and sought comment on the
12
References
13
Ingraham, N. (2013, December 18). FCC officially proposes removing its 40-year-old
sports blackout rules. Retrieved April 4, 2015, from The Verge website:
http://www.theverge.com/policy/2013/12/18/5224952/fcc-officiallyproposes-removing-its-40-year-old-sports-blackout-rules.
Satellite Home Viewer Extension and Reauthorization Act of 2004, FCC 10195, ET Docket No. 06-94, at 49 (2010).
Satellite Home Viewer Extension and Reauthorization Act of 2004, Title IX of the
14
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005, Pub. L. No. 108-447, 204, 118 Stat
2809, 3393, 3423-24 (2004), codified at 47 U.S.C. 339(c)(1).
Satellite Television Extension and Localism Act of 2010, Title V of the American
Workers, State, and Business Relief Act of 2010, Pub. L. 111-175, 124 Stat.
1218 (2010).
Sports Blackouts Consumer Guide [Pamphlet]. (2015). Washington, DC: The Federal
Communications Commissions.