Professional Documents
Culture Documents
VoLTE Case Study
VoLTE Case Study
VoLTE Case Study
Case Study
Next Generation Services
Services- RCS, VoLTE and Beyond
ETSI / GSMA / MSF Operator Workshop
Allan Johnson
General Manager, HelloSoft V.VoIP
Imagination Technologies
V01.11 nov07
Company overview
Leading Silicon, IP Clients & Cloud IP supplier
Graphics/video/comms, VoLTE/Video/RCS, Cloud
Played significant role in creating Smartphone Segment
by offering industry leading multimedia technologies
Played leading role in worlds first commercial VoLTE
deployment
C
o s
m
m
Graphics
GPU
Compute
Video
Display
Software
Clients
Clou
d
Processor
Enabling
Systems
HelloSoft
HelloSoft Division
Total Revenues
2008-2009 YR:
2009-2010
2009
2010 YR:
2010-2011 YR:
2011-2012 YR:
V01.11 nov07
$104.11m/64.1m
$131 40m/80 9m
$131.40m/80.9m
$159.17m/98.0m
$207.08m/127.5m
Confidential Subject to NDA
V01.11 nov07
Applications
pp
Processor
Modem
Modem
3G/LTE/WiFi
VoLTE
SIP
RTP/RTCP
RCS/IMS
VCC/IP2IP
V01.11 nov07
Products
V.VoIP, VoLTE, VCC, IMS and RCS
HelloSoft Mobile
V VoIP SDK
V.VoIP
HelloSoft VoLTE
& VCC
Fully standards compliant with 3GPP Voice over LTE and IR-92 specs
Incorporates award winning multiplatform HelloSoft VoIP,
VoIP IMS
IMS, VCC
technology featuring AEC (Acoustic Echo Cancellation) and NC (Noise
Cancellation)
HelloSoft IMS
Stack
HelloSoft Handoff
Technology
HelloSoft Rich
Communication
S it (RCS)
Suite
V01.11 nov07
V01.11 nov07
V01.11 nov07
V01.11 nov07
Mobile device
Mobile device
V LTE &
VoLTE
IMS/RCS stacks
& applications
Application
Processor
LTE
Modem
IMS/RCS stacks
& applications
Application
Processor
VoLTE
LTEModem
ADVANTAGES:
ADVANTAGES:
Allows for a single IMS stack on the application
More familiar model since this is the legacy
partitioning used for circuit switched voice
processor
VoLTE can be easily integrated into other applications. LTE modem vendors such as Qualcomm & others
may offer this approach
Provides better audio/video integration because the
Claims to be lower power in some cases (e.g. if you
video subsystem is on the application processor
could
ld power off
ff the
h application
li i processor d
during
i a
Lower power in some cases
voice call) but in other cases it is not
More power efficient and better architecture for
DISADVANTAGES:
supporting multiple IP bearers
Dual IMS stack one stack on the modem for
e g for VoLTE to VoWiFi seamless handoff
e.g.
VoLTE and one on the AP for everything else
Voice-video synchronization must span both
DISADVANTAGES:
modem and AP processors
Cannot power off the application processor during
Handoff to multiple IP bearers such as WiFi are
voice calls ( although in practice, generally the AP is
difficult and inefficient
Less flexible and voice feature upgrades tied to the
not powered off)
modem
V01.11 nov07
Infrastructure
Component
Number of IOT
Test cases
dependent on that
vendor for testing
RAN
5%
TAS
5%
S/I-CSCF
4%
MGCF/MGW
3%
HSS
12%
SBC / P-CSCF
14%
HLR
6%
V01.11 nov07
VQT Analyzer
VQT Equipment
Wired IP Phone
Gold CS Phone
HS VoLTE Client #2
HS VoLTE Client #1
V01.11 nov07
V01.11 nov07
3 Greatest Challenges
Multi-party IOT
HSS
TAS
PCSCF
MGW
S/I- PCRF
CSCF
SBC
OEM
14
Integra-
Ch
hipset
IOT
InfraInfra
structure
tion
VoLTE
RCS
Provider
AP+LTE
Chipset
+
Drivers
Significant investment / schedule time in the Multi-party IOT
V01.11 nov07
3 Greatest Challenges
Challenge #2 getting the right carrier stewardship model
2) HYBRID #1
3) HYBRID #2
4) OEM CENTRIC
1) CARRIER CENTRIC
- Carrier vendor selection/business
terms/integration
- Carrier mandates client to OEM
- Carrier supervises integration/execution
5) SemiCo CENTRIC
Initially,
y carrier must drive and have high
g control carrier centric model
As the ecosystem matures and scales, a shift to the device centric model occurs
15
V01.11 nov07
3 Greatest Challenges
#3 getting the 1st VoLTE handset across the finish line on time
Kickoff
Target
1 month
Actual
1 month
First
Handset
Additional
Handset 1 month
OEM
Additional
Handset 1 month
S
Same
OEM
APIs
Tested
Integration
Complete
2 months
1 mon
1 mon
1 month
2 months
2 months
IODT
Complete
(Lab)
Total
Time
5
mon
1 month
1 month
1 month
1 month
Production IOT
+ Drive Tests.
1+ mon
1 mon
1 month 1+ mon 9
mon
1 month
6
mon
1 month
4
mon
NOTES:
1. First handset incurred additional time in IODT (Lab) / IOT ( production )
Much of this time was due to multi-vendor infrastructure dependencies
2 H
2.
Having
i the
th 3rd party
t VoLTE
V LTE solution
l ti
allows
ll
scalability,
l bilit risk
i k reduction,
d ti
and
d
cost savings and time to market advantage across many devices
V01.11 nov07
Carrier
Lab
Network
Carrier
Production
Network
OEM
USA
Stack
USA
OEM
Asia
ODM
Asia
Stack
Asia
17
V01.11 nov07
3.42
0.29
3 65
3.65
58
87.93%
5.17%
1.72%
0.00%
PESQ
2.42
0.23
2 71
2.71
58
0.00%
100.00%
5.17%
1.72%
PESQ
Uplink MOS
Imagination DL
Competition DL
3.42
0.26
3 64
3.64
59
83.05%
5.08%
0.00%
0.00%
PESQ
2.38
0.16
2 61
2.61
59
0.00%
100.00%
1.69%
1.69%
PESQ
VoiceQualityduringDriveTesting
4.0
PESQ(MOS)SScore
3.5
3.0
Handset#1
25
2.5
2.0
Handset#2
1.5
Handset#3(not
I
Imaginationsolution)
i ti
l ti )
1.0
0.5
0.0
DLAvg
DLMAX
ULAvg
ULMAX
V01.11 nov07
Uplink MOS
CS Call Downlink
VoLTE Downlink
CS Call Uplink
VoLTE Uplink
Average
2.39
3.85
2.35
3.84
Standard Deviation
0.28
0.30
0.31
0.30
Maximum Score
2 91
2.91
4 06
4.06
2 94
2.94
4 06
4.06
Count
141
165
143
165
0.00%
95.15%
0.00%
95.15%
100.00%
3.64%
100.00%
2.42%
11.35%
0.00%
12.59%
0.61%
3.55%
0.00%
4.90%
0.61%
PESQ
PESQ
PESQ
PESQ
PESQ(MOS)Score
VoiceQualityfor
VoLTE vs. Circuit Switched
VoLTEvs.CircuitSwitched
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
VoLTEHandset
CircuitSwitchedHandset
DLAvg
DLMAX
ULAvg
ULMAX
V01.11 nov07
Conclusions
1. VoLTE is giving much better voice quality than circuit switched calls
2. Significant differences in voice quality performance between VoLTE solutions
3. IOT is multi-vendor and of course the maturity cycle in multi-vendor IOT is in
the early stages.
4. Once a VoLTE protocol stack is through production on one handset, it can be
readily scaled across many handsets
5. Project start ( for VoLTE integration) to production shipment can be achieved
in 9 months, for the first handsets, with a target of 4 months for subsequent
waves of handsets, including IOT
6. Full service support from vendors is critical for first wave of handsets.
Once the first wave of handsets is through, additional handsets can be
brought out quite quickly
7. Modem based VoLTE vs. Application Processor based VoLTE
Modem based has the advantage of a familiar approach to CS
but
Application Processor based VoLTE provides more flexibility for integration
with future rich media applications
8 V
8.
VoLTE
LTE is
i nott just
j t in
i lab
l b trials
ti l
production handsets are here now and VoLTE works very well, thank you !
20
V01.11 nov07
October 11,
11 2012