Professional Documents
Culture Documents
How To Calibrate An Eyepiece Graticule
How To Calibrate An Eyepiece Graticule
How To Calibrate An Eyepiece Graticule
1. Use an eye piece lens that has been fitted with a graticule
2. Place the stage micrometer onto the microscope stage and focus using the low
power objective lens so that the graticule scale becomes superimposed over the
micrometer scale
3. Move the stage micrometer until the start or zero line of each scale is
coincident
4. Look along the scale until another coincident point is found. Ideally, the point
should be as furthest as well
5. The relationship between the two scales can now be calculated
B. Points to focus on while drawing plan diagrams (yes, you could be asked one of
those in P5 as well but not directly from a slide as such)
1. NO SHADING. I think we all know this point well enough
2. NO CELLS in LOW POWER plan diagrams. CELLS NEED TO BE SHOWN in
HIGH POWER plan diagrams
Also, when asked to give magnification, round it off to a whole number. X1000.755
should best be rounded off as x1000
3. Only outlines
4. ANNOTATIONS (Refers to describing the slide for example the xylem is stained
red)
5. Always keep in mind the relative thickness of the various tissue layers being
drawn.
10 vol H202:
It will produce 10cm3 of oxygen from every cm3 that decomposes. Likewise,
2cm3 10vol H2O2 will give 20cm3 of H2O2
Mass-volume %= Mass of solid solute in g per 100 ml of the resulting solution.
Often used for solutions made from a solid solute dissolved in a liquid
Divide the volume change by the fixed interval of time to find the rate of oxygen
uptake.
Do this for series of periods and plot of graph of oxygen uptake against time. The
slope at anytime should give the rate of oxygen uptake at that time.
-Some people find the sap from plants irritating to the skin
-Take care when cutting the plant shoot
-Take care when handling the glass potometer. It is easy to break the long glass
tubes and cut or stab ourselves with broken ends. So, be prepared with first aid
and for cuts from broken glass!
http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/wiki/Revision:Biology_Practicals__how_to_carry_out_some_experiments
For t-test :
1. TWO means are compared
2. The data has normal distribution
3. There is no overlap between sets of data
THE PROBABILITIES THAT THE TEST PRODUCES ARE PROBABILITIES THAT
THE NULL HYPOTHESIS IS CORRECT, AND THERE IS NOT SIGNIFICANT
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE MEANS OF TWO SAMPLES.
The t-test (as well as the chi-squared test) have what we call critical values. The
critical value is a value greater than which all t-values would show that the
differences between the two samples are significant. We can think of the tdistribution as a normal distribution when n>30. With the desired t-value(the
mean of the normal distribution) to be zero. The further the value of t from the
given value , the more uneasy the null hypothesis becomes to digest. There comes
one value for which, we have had enough. This value is the critical t-value.
If the total number of observations (both samples added together) is below 30,
error due to chance is significant and the table of t makes an adjustment to
critical values to take this into account, why is why we need to calculate the
HORRIBLE DEGREES OF FREEDOM.
DEGREES OF FREEDOM (WTF!): The degrees of freedom of an estimate is the
number of independent pieces of information that go into the estimate. In
general, the degrees of freedom for an estimate is equal to the number of values
minus the number of parameters estimated en route to the estimate in question.
For example, to estimate the population variance one must first estimate the
population mean. Therefore, if the estimate of variance is based on N
observations, there are N-1 degrees of freedom. For two samples, each with N
samples, the total number of degrees of freedom in N-1+N-1= N-2
It should be noted that t-test gives us a measure of VALIDITY not RELIABILITY
(the extent of reliability is determined by the spread of value about the mean
value i.e. SD). Also, the t-test only compares two means and thus we can only
write comparative statements about those two means. We cannot deduce a
conclusion about the whole sample from a result of t-test which compares only 2
results
I know all that did not make sense, but I tried, sigh... Mukesh you could use your
articulate language to put more sense into these seemingly abstract stuffs!
Alright, let me give an entirely exam-oriented perspective at these statistical
tests:
1) It is just math
2) They give you the formula, there is no memorisation required
3) It assumes you have knowledge on elementary statistics (i.e. mean, standard
deviation)
4) It also assumes that you have brought a reasonably functional calculator with
you
5) It is an excuse you can use when you are asked to suggest to what extent a
given hypothesis is supported by the student's results (trust me, it's always the
student that gets the results, they always use the term student in this type of
thing, coincidence or lack of originality in CIE's part?)
6) They will give you this table for both tests with "degrees of freedom" and the
"probability is greater than". These terms are unnaturally fancy for something this
basic and so are the names "chi-squared" and "t-test". What're you trying to do,
scare us teens from our pursuit of a career in science?
7) Degrees of freedom means the amount of freedom the data has when we are
comparing them. This "freedom" is not the same as the "get out of jail" freedom.
Don't think about it too much, it just means, in our sample of data, there is this
amount of randomness due to the large/small number of data which we need to
keep in consideration when calculating the values for the chi-squared and t
probability. (In other words: the more the data, the more we need to consider the
spread of it, hence we need to alter the testing values to suit the different
numbers of data that may be presented to us) Mathematically, it is just n -1 where
n = number of data.
Calculate --> Compare --> Reject (and by reject I mean reject the null
hypothesis). What a null hypothesis basically is, is the exact opposite statement of
what we are testing. If we are testing the difference between two sets of values,
we say they are not different, so the tests let us prove ourselves wrong (scientists
are so crazy that they love being proven wrong! What a hobby! ). So, we calculate
the t and chi-squared values using the formula that is given to us. Compare it with
the respective value with the same degrees of freedom in the provided table (if
your degree of freedom is not in the table, just find the values it lies between and
find the mean of the respective probabilities of the two values, i.e. your degrees of
freedom is 29 but the table only lists values for 28 and 30. Now if the values at 28
and 30 are 2.1 and 2.2, respectively, then the value you're looking for is 2.15! Get
it?) I don't remember how the value relates to the rejection or acceptance of the
hypothesis but you have Pranav (AKA Zeebu) for that.
9) STAY CALM! This is just a small city of the big country we know as Biology P5,
so please, if you don't understand it, stop wasting your time, move on and
concentrate on better and more important things!
10) Good day!
3. Controlling any 2 variables (you MUST mention the method of controlling). This
mainly deals with the accuracy of the experiment
4. Any 2 procedures of using the apparatus
5. How to make the experiment reliable
6. Safety precaution
if no obvious safety precaution is required you MUST mention that "THIS IS A
LOW RISK EXPERIMENT".
This is awesome stuff. Just use your knowledge in Biology to predict how to
control the variables and how to measure them. Likewise, the constants must be
appropriate to the context. The apparatus will always be something that you have
seen or used before so please make sure you know how to use all the lab stuff.
Safety precaution, don't be skittish to mention your fears of cutting yourself,
burning yourself, corroding yourself (with strong acids) or poisoning yourself (the
dangerously volatile ethanol). Yes, mention "THIS IS A LOW RISK EXPERIMENT".
As a matter of fact, you can say: "Although there is a risk of cutting yourself while
taking a section of <insert appropriate biological content here>, this is a
relatively low risk experiment" to get two whole marks. How's that for cheap?
This is not very important but we can never be sure if CIE picks on this:
Be careful about the use of AGAR and AGAROSE:
Use agar in the context of microbiology
Use agarose in the context of gel electrophoresis
For gel electrophoresis:
http://learn.genetics.utah.edu/content/labs/gel/
If you are asked to reason why a given data is anomalous:
1. First mention that it doesn't fit the general trend and give a reason supporting
that
2. Mention what kind of experimental errors could have resulted in the anomalous
result
Respirometer:
- When using it to compare the rate of respiration of two different species, make