Rubric: Significance of a Medieval Individual

Objectives

Below
Performance
Limited

Developing
some

Commendable
considerable

Exemplary
High degree

Research

Demonstrates a
limited degree
research and
evaluation. Has
only used 2 or
less sources
with limited
reliability.

Demonstrates
some degree of
research and
evaluation. Has
used 3 sources
in similar
formats, with
some level of
reliability.

Demonstrates a
considerable
degree of
research and
evaluation. Has
utilised 3
sources in
various forms of
considerable
reliability.

0-5

6-10

11-15

Demonstrates a
high level of
research and
evaluation of
sources. Has
evaluated and
used 3 sources
in various forms
with a high
degree of
reliability.
16-20

Expresses and
organises ideas
with limited
effectiveness.
The interview is
disorganised
and has limited
effectiveness.
The presentation
demonstrates
limited
understanding of
significance.
0-3

Expresses and
organises ideas
with some
effectiveness.
The interview is
organised and
occasionally
effective. The
presentation
demonstrates
some
understanding of
significance.
4-7

Expresses and
organises ideas
with a
considerable
degree of
coherence. The
interview is well
organised and
considerably
effective. The
presentation
demonstrates a
considerable
understanding of
significance.
8-11

Expresses and
organises ideas
with a high
degree of
coherence. The
interview is well
organised and
highly effective.
The presentation
demonstrates an
understanding of
significance.

Creation of an
audio and image
file, or a video
file, like videos
you can upload
to YouTube. You
will be sharing
these!

Recording was
poor in quality.
Background
noise detracted
from content
and/or timing
was not within
the specified
timeframe of 4-6
minutes.
0-7

Recording was
good quality
overall, but there
were some
issues. Timing
was not used
effectively: it did
not fall within 4-6
minutes and/or
there was not
enough content
portrayed.
8-15

Recording was
good quality.
Timing was good
but could have
been used more
effectively to
display a more
detailed analysis
of content. Time
fell within 4-6
minutes.
16 - 23

Recording was
of a high quality,
and timing was
utilised
efficiently.
Content was
detailed and
within the
expected
timeframe of 5-6
minutes. 24 -30

Workload

Workload was

Attempt was

Workload was

Workload was

The evidence
found and
sources used to
get content for
the podcast.
/20

Coherence
/15
How well the
ideas and facts
flow together to
create a full and
easily
understood
piece.

Podcast
/30

12-15

/10

not divided
evenly.

made to divide
workload evenly,
but did not
always occur.
3-5

divided mostly
evenly.

divided evenly.

6-8

9-10

Little insight was

demonstrated
when assessing
learning
objectives and
collaboration

Some insight
was
demonstrated,
but mainly
focused on
summarising the
work process.

Clear insight
was
demonstrated,
including an
evaluation of the
process and
objectives
achieved.

0-5

6-10

11-15

Detailed insight
was
demonstrated
including
evaluation of
process,
objectives
achieved and
collaboration.
16-20

Attempt was
made to produce
a reference list.
Formatting was
not consistent.

A good attempt
was made to
produce a
reference list but
there were some
issues and/or
inconsistency.

A solid attempt
at referencing
was produced.
One or two
errors.

An exceptional
reference list
was created. No
errors.

2-3
4

Everyone works
equally.
0-2
Reflection
/20
Thoughts about
your work, the
process and any
strengths or
issues you had.

Referencing
/5
Making sure that
if you use a
resource, you
have named it in
a way anyone
can find the
information.