Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Hfy3 3125 Civ TQ 0003 Commented

    Uploaded by

    Ashraf Abdulredha
    16 views1 page
    This technical query document addresses a discrepancy in culvert design load values between project drawings and AASHTO standards. The contractor notes drawings state 140kN and 280kN concentrated loads for culvert slab design, but AASHTO shows a maximum wheel load of 71kN. The contractor seeks confirmation that a 140kN wheel load should be used for design per their understanding. The document requests the customer's input on whether the project scope, cost, or schedule would be affected by implementing the contractor's recommended 140kN design load.

    Original Description:

    Tq 0003 Commented

    Original Title

    Hfy3 3125 Civ Tq 0003 Commented

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This technical query document addresses a discrepancy in culvert design load values between project drawings and AASHTO standards. The contractor notes drawings state 140kN and 280kN concentrated loads for culvert slab design, but AASHTO shows a maximum wheel load of 71kN. The contractor seeks confirmation that a 140kN wheel load should be used for design per their understanding. The document requests the customer's input on whether the project scope, cost, or schedule would be affected by implementing the contractor's recommended 140kN design load.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    16 views1 page

    Hfy3 3125 Civ TQ 0003 Commented

    Uploaded by

    Ashraf Abdulredha
    This technical query document addresses a discrepancy in culvert design load values between project drawings and AASHTO standards. The contractor notes drawings state 140kN and 280kN concentrated loads for culvert slab design, but AASHTO shows a maximum wheel load of 71kN. The contractor seeks confirmation that a 140kN wheel load should be used for design per their understanding. The document requests the customer's input on whether the project scope, cost, or schedule would be affected by implementing the contractor's recommended 140kN design load.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    Halfaya Oil Field Surface Facility Phase 3 Project

    PetroChina
    Halfaya

    DOC.NO.: HFY3-3125-CIV-TQ-0003

    Page 1 / 2

    Technical Query
    : GTH
    : PetroChina International Iraq FZE
    Iraq Branch
    Reference : HFY3-SD-CIV-DW-01108/01110,
    AASHTO
    From
    To

    Contract No.
    Attention
    Issued Date
    Discipline

    :
    :
    :
    :

    HFY-CON/F&C0592-0616
    PMT/PMC
    2/Apr/2015
    CIV

    Subject: CLARIFICATION FOR CULVERT


    CONTRACTOR
    Description:
    There is discrepancy in the statement of notes in the reference drawings, where it states 140 kN and 280 kN
    (different value in different notes) as concentrated load induced from vehicle for culvert slab design. Our
    understanding is that, wheel load corresponding to 140 kN shall be applicable for design purpose, whereas
    AASHTO shows a maximum wheel load of 16 kip = 71 kN for class H20-44 loading (Please refer attachment
    1 ) . Please advise if our understanding is correct / advise otherwise.
    Affected Disciplines:
    HSE

    Process

    Plot Plan

    Mechanical

    Instrument

    Electrical

    Piping

    Civil/Structure

    Affected Document/Drawing:

    HFY3-SD-CIV-DW-01108/01110

    Where is the attachment? To be enclosed with TQ.

    Recommended Solution:
    ----------

    Indicate potential impact: NO


    SOW Change

    Cost

    Schedule

    Re-Hazop If Yes, need Project Change Order Request

    Originator
    Print Name

    Discipline Lead

    Ariffin Musa

    Project Manager

    Ariffin Musa

    Signature
    04/04/2015

    Date

    04/04/2015

    CUSTOMER
    PMT/PMC Comment:
    To be resubmitted.

    Confirm if project scope, cost or schedule affected?


    Change Request required

    Yes

    No

    Proceed with Modification

    Yes

    No

    Discipline
    Print Name

    Ariffin Musa

    Yes

    If Yes, implement Change Order Procedure

    Engineering Manager
    Ariffin Musa

    Signature
    Date

    04/04/2015

    No

    04/04/2015

    Project Manager

    You might also like