Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • McGrath v. Rhay, 364 U.S. 279 (1960)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    14 views1 page
    The Supreme Court denied the respondent's motion to dismiss a writ of certiorari. The Court vacated the judgment of the Supreme Court of Washington and remanded the case to determine two questions of Washington state law: (1) whether the case is moot as a habeas corpus proceeding and (2) if so, whether the case can be treated as an application for another form of relief to avoid mootness.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1960-06-27 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 364 U.S. 279 Docket: 720

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    COURT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The Supreme Court denied the respondent's motion to dismiss a writ of certiorari. The Court vacated the judgment of the Supreme Court of Washington and remanded the case to determine two questions of Washington state law: (1) whether the case is moot as a habeas corpus proceeding and (2) if so, whether the case can be treated as an application for another form of relief to avoid mootness.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as COURT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as court, pdf, or txt
    14 views1 page

    McGrath v. Rhay, 364 U.S. 279 (1960)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The Supreme Court denied the respondent's motion to dismiss a writ of certiorari. The Court vacated the judgment of the Supreme Court of Washington and remanded the case to determine two questions of Washington state law: (1) whether the case is moot as a habeas corpus proceeding and (2) if so, whether the case can be treated as an application for another form of relief to avoid mootness.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as COURT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as court, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    364 U.S.

    279
    80 S.Ct. 1609
    4 L.Ed.2d 1719

    Robert J. McGRATH et al.


    v.
    B. J. RHAY, Superintendent of Washington State Penitentiary.
    No. 720.

    Supreme Court of the United States


    June 27, 1960

    Petitioners pro se.


    Messrs. John J. O'Connell, Atty. Gen. of Washington, and Stephen C.
    Way, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.
    Writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Washington.
    PER CURIAM.

    The respondent's motion to dismiss the writ of certiorari is denied. The


    judgment of the Supreme Court of Washington is vacated and the case is
    remanded for determination of the following questions of Washington law now
    involved in the case: (1) whether the case is moot as a habeas corpus
    proceeding; and (2) if it is, whether, to avoid mootness, it can properly be
    treated as an application for some other form of appropriate relief.

    You might also like