William George Bonin v. California, 489 U.S. 1091 (1989)

You might also like

Download as court, pdf, or txt
Download as court, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

489 U.S.

1091
109 S.Ct. 1561
103 L.Ed.2d 864

William George BONIN, petitioner,


v.
CALIFORNIA.
No. 88-6341.

Supreme Court of the United States


March 20, 1989

On petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California.


The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
Motion for Leave to File Petition for Rehearing Denied Oct. 10, 1989.
See 493 U.S. 914, 110 S.Ct. 272.
Justice MARSHALL, with whom Justice BRENNAN joins, dissenting.

Adhering to my view that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and
unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments,
Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153, 231, 96 S.Ct. 2909, 2973, 49 L.Ed.2d 859
(1976) (MARSHALL, J., dissenting), I would grant the petition for certiorari
and vacate the death sentence in this case. Even if I did not hold this view, I
would grant the petition to resolve the question whether a trial court may
instruct a penalty phase jury that, "[i]f you conclude that the aggravating
circumstances outweigh the mitigating circumstances, you shall impose a
sentence of death." As I stated in Hamilton v. California, 488 U.S. 1047, 109
S.Ct. 879, 102 L.Ed.2d 1002 (1989) (MARSHALL, J., dissenting from denial
of rehearing), "I have grave doubts that such an instruction permits the
individualized and reliable sentencing determination that the Constitution
requires in capital cases, particularly where, as here, it is coupled with
prosecutorial remarks stressing the limits on jurors' discretion." Id., at 1047,
109 S.Ct. at 880. I dissent.

You might also like