The Supreme Court noted probable jurisdiction over appeals from the District Court for the District of Columbia in two cases, California Democratic Party v. Federal Election Commission and Democratic Party of Washington State v. Reed. The cases were consolidated and a total of four hours was allotted for oral argument. The Court set a briefing schedule for the parties and will hear oral arguments on September 8, 2003.
The Supreme Court noted probable jurisdiction over appeals from the District Court for the District of Columbia in two cases, California Democratic Party v. Federal Election Commission and Democratic Party of Washington State v. Reed. The cases were consolidated and a total of four hours was allotted for oral argument. The Court set a briefing schedule for the parties and will hear oral arguments on September 8, 2003.
Copyright:
Public Domain
Available Formats
Download as COURT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
The Supreme Court noted probable jurisdiction over appeals from the District Court for the District of Columbia in two cases, California Democratic Party v. Federal Election Commission and Democratic Party of Washington State v. Reed. The cases were consolidated and a total of four hours was allotted for oral argument. The Court set a briefing schedule for the parties and will hear oral arguments on September 8, 2003.
Copyright:
Public Domain
Available Formats
Download as COURT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
v. Federal Election Commission et al. No. 02-1753.
Supreme Court of United States.
June 5, 2003. 1
Appeals from D. C. D. C.
Probable jurisdiction noted, cases consolidated, and a total of four hours
allotted for oral argument. Briefs of the parties who were plaintiffs in the District Court are to address the questions presented in the jurisdictional statements and are to be filed with the Clerk of the Court and served upon the parties who were defendants in the District Court on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, July 8, 2003. Briefs of the parties who were defendants in the District Court are to be filed with the Clerk of the Court and served upon the parties who were plaintiffs in the District Court on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, August 5, 2003. Any reply briefs by parties who were plaintiffs in the District Court are to be filed with the Clerk of the Court and served upon parties who were defendants in the District Court on or before 3 p.m., Thursday, August 21, 2003. Cases set for oral argument at 10:00 a.m., Monday, September 8, 2003. Reported below: 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 and 948.
Clifton C. Tang v. Appellate Division of The New York Supreme Court, First Department, and Honorable Justices Aron Steuer, 487 F.2d 138, 1st Cir. (1974)
Larry Joe Johnson, Cross-Appellant v. Harry K. Singletary, JR., Secretary of The Florida Department of Corrections, Cross-Appellee, 991 F.2d 663, 11th Cir. (1993)