The Supreme Court noted probable jurisdiction of appeals from the District Court for the District of Columbia, consolidated the cases, and allotted a total of four hours for oral argument. The parties who were plaintiffs in the District Court must file briefs addressing the questions presented in the jurisdictional statements by July 8, 2003. The parties who were defendants must file briefs by August 5, 2003. Any reply briefs by the plaintiffs are due by August 21, 2003. The cases are set for oral argument at 10:00 a.m. on September 8, 2003.
The Supreme Court noted probable jurisdiction of appeals from the District Court for the District of Columbia, consolidated the cases, and allotted a total of four hours for oral argument. The parties who were plaintiffs in the District Court must file briefs addressing the questions presented in the jurisdictional statements by July 8, 2003. The parties who were defendants must file briefs by August 5, 2003. Any reply briefs by the plaintiffs are due by August 21, 2003. The cases are set for oral argument at 10:00 a.m. on September 8, 2003.
Copyright:
Public Domain
Available Formats
Download as COURT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
The Supreme Court noted probable jurisdiction of appeals from the District Court for the District of Columbia, consolidated the cases, and allotted a total of four hours for oral argument. The parties who were plaintiffs in the District Court must file briefs addressing the questions presented in the jurisdictional statements by July 8, 2003. The parties who were defendants must file briefs by August 5, 2003. Any reply briefs by the plaintiffs are due by August 21, 2003. The cases are set for oral argument at 10:00 a.m. on September 8, 2003.
Copyright:
Public Domain
Available Formats
Download as COURT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
v. McConnell, United States Senator, et al. No. 02-1702.
Supreme Court of United States.
June 5, 2003. 1
Appeals from D. C. D. C.
Probable jurisdiction noted, cases consolidated, and a total of four hours
allotted for oral argument. Briefs of the parties who were plaintiffs in the District Court are to address the questions presented in the jurisdictional statements and are to be filed with the Clerk of the Court and served upon the parties who were defendants in the District Court on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, July 8, 2003. Briefs of the parties who were defendants in the District Court are to be filed with the Clerk of the Court and served upon the parties who were plaintiffs in the District Court on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, August 5, 2003. Any reply briefs by parties who were plaintiffs in the District Court are to be filed with the Clerk of the Court and served upon parties who were defendants in the District Court on or before 3 p.m., Thursday, August 21, 2003. Cases set for oral argument at 10:00 a.m., Monday, September 8, 2003. Reported below: 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 and 948.
Clifton C. Tang v. Appellate Division of The New York Supreme Court, First Department, and Honorable Justices Aron Steuer, 487 F.2d 138, 1st Cir. (1974)
Larry Joe Johnson, Cross-Appellant v. Harry K. Singletary, JR., Secretary of The Florida Department of Corrections, Cross-Appellee, 991 F.2d 663, 11th Cir. (1993)
In Re: Kensington International Limited and Springfield Associates, LLC, (Related To U.S. Bankruptcy Court For The District of Delaware No. 00-03837), 351 F.3d 97, 3rd Cir. (2003)