Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 9 views

    Alabama v. North Carolina, 540 U.S. 1014 (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Bradford R. Clark was appointed as the Special Master in the case of Alabama et al. v. North Carolina. The Special Master was given authority to set the filing schedule for additional briefs, oversee further case proceedings, summon witnesses, issue subpoenas, and accept evidence. He was directed to submit reports on the case. The parties will be responsible for costs including the Special Master and his staff compensation, expenses, and report printing in proportions to be determined later.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as COURT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Alabama v. North Carolina, 540 U.S. 1014 (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views1 page
    Bradford R. Clark was appointed as the Special Master in the case of Alabama et al. v. North Carolina. The Special Master was given authority to set the filing schedule for additional briefs, oversee further case proceedings, summon witnesses, issue subpoenas, and accept evidence. He was directed to submit reports on the case. The parties will be responsible for costs including the Special Master and his staff compensation, expenses, and report printing in proportions to be determined later.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2003-11-17 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 540 U.S. 1014 Docket: 132, Orig

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    COURT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Bradford R. Clark was appointed as the Special Master in the case of Alabama et al. v. North Carolina. The Special Master was given authority to set the filing schedule for additional briefs, oversee further case proceedings, summon witnesses, issue subpoenas, and accept evidence. He was directed to submit reports on the case. The parties will be responsible for costs including the Special Master and his staff compensation, expenses, and report printing in proportions to be determined later.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as COURT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as court, pdf, or txt
    9 views1 page

    Alabama v. North Carolina, 540 U.S. 1014 (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Bradford R. Clark was appointed as the Special Master in the case of Alabama et al. v. North Carolina. The Special Master was given authority to set the filing schedule for additional briefs, oversee further case proceedings, summon witnesses, issue subpoenas, and accept evidence. He was directed to submit reports on the case. The parties will be responsible for costs including the Special Master and his staff compensation, expenses, and report printing in proportions to be determined later.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as COURT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as court, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    540 U.S.

    1014

    ALABAMA ET AL.
    v.
    NORTH CAROLINA.
    No. 132, Orig.

    Supreme Court of United States.


    November 17, 2003.
    1

    It is ordered that Bradford R. Clark, Esq., of Washington, D. C., be appointed


    as Special Master in this case with authority to fix the time and conditions for
    the filing of additional pleadings and to direct subsequent proceedings, and with
    authority to summon witnesses, issue subpoenas, and take such evidence as
    may be introduced and such as he may deem it necessary to call for. The
    Special Master is directed to submit such reports as he may deem appropriate.

    The compensation of the Special Master, the allowances to him, the


    compensation paid to his legal, technical, stenographic, and clerical assistants,
    the cost of printing his reports, and all other proper expenses, including travel
    expenses, shall be charged against and be borne by the parties in such
    proportion as the Court may hereafter direct. [For earlier order herein, see 539
    U. S. 925.]

    You might also like