Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 10 views

    Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. James N. Kirby, Pty LTD., Dba Kirby Engineering, 542 U.S. 963 (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The Supreme Court granted certiorari to Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. James N. Kirby, Pty Ltd., dba Kirby Engineering, et al. and directed the parties to file supplemental briefs addressing whether federal or state substantive law governs the questions presented in the case. The Acting Solicitor General was also invited to file an amicus brief on the same question regarding federal versus state law. The parties and Acting Solicitor General were ordered to file briefs by October 4, 2004.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as COURT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. James N. Kirby, Pty LTD., Dba Kirby Engineering, 542 U.S. 963 (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    10 views1 page
    The Supreme Court granted certiorari to Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. James N. Kirby, Pty Ltd., dba Kirby Engineering, et al. and directed the parties to file supplemental briefs addressing whether federal or state substantive law governs the questions presented in the case. The Acting Solicitor General was also invited to file an amicus brief on the same question regarding federal versus state law. The parties and Acting Solicitor General were ordered to file briefs by October 4, 2004.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-09-24 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 542 U.S. 963 Docket: 02-1028

    Original Title

    Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. James N. Kirby, Pty Ltd., Dba Kirby Engineering, 542 U.S. 963 (2004)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    COURT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The Supreme Court granted certiorari to Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. James N. Kirby, Pty Ltd., dba Kirby Engineering, et al. and directed the parties to file supplemental briefs addressing whether federal or state substantive law governs the questions presented in the case. The Acting Solicitor General was also invited to file an amicus brief on the same question regarding federal versus state law. The parties and Acting Solicitor General were ordered to file briefs by October 4, 2004.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as COURT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as court, pdf, or txt
    10 views1 page

    Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. James N. Kirby, Pty LTD., Dba Kirby Engineering, 542 U.S. 963 (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The Supreme Court granted certiorari to Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. James N. Kirby, Pty Ltd., dba Kirby Engineering, et al. and directed the parties to file supplemental briefs addressing whether federal or state substantive law governs the questions presented in the case. The Acting Solicitor General was also invited to file an amicus brief on the same question regarding federal versus state law. The parties and Acting Solicitor General were ordered to file briefs by October 4, 2004.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as COURT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as court, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    542 U.S.

    963

    NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO.


    v.
    JAMES N. KIRBY, PTY LTD., DBA KIRBY ENGINEERING,
    ET AL.
    No. 02-1028.

    Supreme Court of United States.


    September 24, 2004.
    1

    C. A. 11th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 540 U. S. 1099.] Parties are directed to file
    supplemental briefs addressing the following question: "Does federal or state
    substantive law govern the questions presented?" The Acting Solicitor General
    is invited to file an amicus brief on the same question. Briefs are to be filed with
    the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Monday,
    October 4, 2004. Twenty copies of the briefs prepared under this Court's Rule
    33.2 may be filed initially in order to meet the October 4 filing date. Forty
    copies of the briefs prepared under this Court's Rule 33.1 are to be filed as soon
    as possible thereafter.

    You might also like