Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 6 views

    Green County, Kentucky v. Mary Amis Quinlan, of The Last Will and Testament of Leonard Q. Quinlan, Deceased. Green County, Kentucky v. Thomas, 211 U.S. 597 (1909)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The dissenting opinion summarizes that the circuit court of appeals judge, Judge Lurton, correctly found that the findings of fact in these two cases, Green County, Kentucky v. Mary Amis Quinlan and Green County, Kentucky v. Thomas, were neither definite nor full enough to justify a judgment for the plaintiff. Without expressing views on the merits, the dissenting justice, Justice Harlan, believes the judgments in both cases should be reversed and remanded for a new trial to allow for more full disclosure of facts and sufficient findings.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as COURT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Green County, Kentucky v. Mary Amis Quinlan, of The Last Will and Testament of Leonard Q. Quinlan, Deceased. Green County, Kentucky v. Thomas, 211 U.S. 597 (1909)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views1 page
    The dissenting opinion summarizes that the circuit court of appeals judge, Judge Lurton, correctly found that the findings of fact in these two cases, Green County, Kentucky v. Mary Amis Quinlan and Green County, Kentucky v. Thomas, were neither definite nor full enough to justify a judgment for the plaintiff. Without expressing views on the merits, the dissenting justice, Justice Harlan, believes the judgments in both cases should be reversed and remanded for a new trial to allow for more full disclosure of facts and sufficient findings.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1909-01-04 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 211 U.S. 597 Docket: 351

    Original Title

    Green County, Kentucky v. Mary Amis Quinlan, of the Last Will and Testament of Leonard Q. Quinlan, Deceased. Green County, Kentucky v. Thomas, 211 U.S. 597 (1909)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    COURT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The dissenting opinion summarizes that the circuit court of appeals judge, Judge Lurton, correctly found that the findings of fact in these two cases, Green County, Kentucky v. Mary Amis Quinlan and Green County, Kentucky v. Thomas, were neither definite nor full enough to justify a judgment for the plaintiff. Without expressing views on the merits, the dissenting justice, Justice Harlan, believes the judgments in both cases should be reversed and remanded for a new trial to allow for more full disclosure of facts and sufficient findings.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as COURT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as court, pdf, or txt
    6 views1 page

    Green County, Kentucky v. Mary Amis Quinlan, of The Last Will and Testament of Leonard Q. Quinlan, Deceased. Green County, Kentucky v. Thomas, 211 U.S. 597 (1909)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The dissenting opinion summarizes that the circuit court of appeals judge, Judge Lurton, correctly found that the findings of fact in these two cases, Green County, Kentucky v. Mary Amis Quinlan and Green County, Kentucky v. Thomas, were neither definite nor full enough to justify a judgment for the plaintiff. Without expressing views on the merits, the dissenting justice, Justice Harlan, believes the judgments in both cases should be reversed and remanded for a new trial to allow for more full disclosure of facts and sufficient findings.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as COURT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as court, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    211 U.S.

    597
    29 S.Ct. 170
    53 L.Ed. 343

    GREEN COUNTY, Kentucky, Petitioner,


    v.
    MARY AMIS QUINLAN, Executrix of the Last Will and
    Testament of Leonard Q. Quinlan, Deceased. GREEN
    COUNTY, Kentucky, Petitioner, v. THOMAS, Executor.
    No. 351.
    No. 352.

    Supreme Court of the United States


    January 4, 1909

    Mr. Justice Harlan, dissenting:

    I quite agree with Judge Lurton of the circuit court of appeals, that common
    justice requires that there should not be now any judgment upon the merits in
    these cases. He correctly said that the findings of fact do not adequately cover
    all the issues, and upon those to which they are responsive they are neither
    definite nor full enough to justify a judgment in favor of the plaintiff. Without
    expressing at this time any views upon the merits of these cases, I am of
    opinion that the judgment in each case should be reversed and the cases
    remanded with an order for a new trial, when all the facts may be more fully
    disclosed and sufficient findings made.

    You might also like