Weir v. Rountree, 216 U.S. 607 (1910)

You might also like

Download as court, pdf, or txt
Download as court, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

216 U.S.

607
30 S.Ct. 418
54 L.Ed. 635

LEVI C. WEIR, W. H. Damsel, and Charles Steele, the


President and Trustees of the Adams Express Company,
Appts.,
v.
AMY J. ROUNTREE.
No. 769.
Submitted February 21, 1910.
Decided February 28, 1910.

Messrs. William C. Scarritt, Elliott H. Jones, and E. L. Scarritt for


appellants.
Messrs. Eugene F. Ware, Biddle & Lardner, and Ware, Nelson, & Ware
for appellee.
Per Curiam:

Bill was filed by the express company to restrain Mrs. Rountree from bringing
suit against the company, which was directed to be dismissed for want of
jurisdiction, because there was no diversity of citizenship and no Federal
ground for jurisdiction. Rountree v. Adams Exp. Co. 91 C. C. A. 186, 165 Fed.
152. From this decree no appeal was taken.

A second suit on the same alleged cause of action was then brought in the name
of the officers of the company, Levi C. Weir and others, alleging their diverse
citizenship. The second suit was dismissed by the circuit court, and carried to
the circuit court of appeals for the eighth circuit, and the latter court affirmed
the decree of the circuit court. 173 Fed. 776.

This appeal was then prosecuted; but we are of opinion that it cannot be
maintained. Colorado Cent. Consol. Min. Co. v. Turck, 150 U. S. 138, 37 L. ed.
1030, 14 Sup. Ct. Rep. 35; Bagley v. General Fire Extinguisher Co. 212 U. S.

477, 53 L. ed. 605, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 341. If the allegations which set up
diversity of citizenship were stricken from the bill, the Federal court would
have had no jurisdiction. Being relied on, the decree of the circuit court of
appeals was final.
4

Appeal dismissed.

97 C. C. A. 500.

You might also like