No law directly provides for the liabilities of hospitals in cases of medical negligence. A hospital, while considered a healthcare provider, is not a practicing medicine. Many courts now allow claims for Hospital Vicarious Liability under the theories of respondeat superior, apparent authority, ostensible authority or agency by estoppel.
No law directly provides for the liabilities of hospitals in cases of medical negligence. A hospital, while considered a healthcare provider, is not a practicing medicine. Many courts now allow claims for Hospital Vicarious Liability under the theories of respondeat superior, apparent authority, ostensible authority or agency by estoppel.
No law directly provides for the liabilities of hospitals in cases of medical negligence. A hospital, while considered a healthcare provider, is not a practicing medicine. Many courts now allow claims for Hospital Vicarious Liability under the theories of respondeat superior, apparent authority, ostensible authority or agency by estoppel.
Hospital is a facility devoted primarily to the diagnosis, treatment and
care of individuals suffering from illness, disease, injury or deformity, or in need of obstetrical or other medical and nursing care. It shall also be construed as any institution, building or place where there are facilities and personnel for the continued and prolonged care of patients. 1 In the Philippines, it may be either public, such as those governed by the State or private maintained and operated by private individuals or corporations. One of the difficulties in establishing liability in cases involving an injury to a patient is that no law directly provides for the liabilities of the hospitals in cases of medical negligence. Primarily, a hospital, while considered a healthcare provider, is not a practicing medicine. While the Medical Act of 1959 describes and enumerates the obligations of a physician to a patient, it does not however define the relationship of a hospital to a patient. Worthy to note however, under the Department of Health Administrative order, for the licensing requirements of a hospital, it recognize, under the general terms, that hospitals have duties to mind the safety of their patients. 2 The prevailing principle in order to establish hospital liability is that a hospital may be considered negligent if it has a duty and it has breached that duty and that breach causes an injury to a patient. Proof of negligence remains a crucial factor. Many courts now allow claims for hospital vicarious liability under the theories of respondeat superior, apparent authority, ostensible authority, or agency by estoppel.3 This is brought about by an increase in hospital liability for medical malpractice.
1 RA. 8344 Section 2(d)
2 Department of Health, Administrative Order No. 147, Series of 2004 Section 9 3 Levin, Hospital Vicarious Liability for Negligence by Independent Contractor Physicians: A New Rule for New Times, October 17, 2005