Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Professional Portfolio
Professional Portfolio
Professional Portfolio
Lee Subin
Table of contents
- Background Information
Resume.. 3
Educational Philosophy. 4
- Teaching Artifacts
Instructional Design....... 4
Created Resources..14
Technology Proficiency..16
Subin Lee
Address: Gimhae City, Gyeongsnagnam-do, South Korea, 621-762 Home: 82553245744
Cell: 821044489418 E-mail: Slee82@murraystate.edu
Professional Summary
I am enthusiastic and dedicated to creating an enjoyable, inviting and dynamic learning atmosphere. I implement
innovative methods in order to motivate students and to teach them English language effectively.
Education
Gyeongsang National University, Gyeonsangnam-do, South Korea. Bachelor of Arts in English Education.
Overall GPA: 4.12/4.5
Murray State University, Murray KY. An exchange student in junior year. Majoring in English (TESOL)
Gyeongnam Foreign Langague High School, Gyeongsangnam-do, South Korea
High School Diploma
March 2009 February 2012
Educational Experience
Jinju Jeil Middle School, Jinju City, Gyeonsangnam-do, South Korea.
Extracurricular Experiences
English to Korean article translation works (Samsung Electronics Inc.,). February 2014 July 2014
21 months of military experience with the US soldiers. 2 Infantry Division, 1 Armored Brigade Combat
Team, 302 Brigade Support Battalion, Charlie company
Educational Philosophy
My philosophy of education is that all students need to be get involved in the class through differentiated
teaching. Because some students' levels will not be equivalent to that of the others, teachers always need to
prepare different materials that may cover all the different students in the classroom such as the IEP, GSSP, 504
plan, or PSP students.
In addition, the class could be test-oriented, but it should not cover the test itself. i.e., teachers should not teach to
the test, which is quite common in South Korea. My class would cover some questions from Korean College
Scholastic Aptitude Test (KCSAT) to help students understand the complex and convoluted texts, but I will not
teach them the strategies to get higher score from the test because that does not help students at all with regards to
improving English fluency.
Lastly, I will always try to keep positive atmosphere in the classroom, and be there when students need me. I will
make sure that if anyone struggles with understanding something, their students will help him/her, and if they
cannot, I will be there to help him/her out.
Instructional Design
1. Units
Instructional Unit
Instructions for Completing Unit Plan
a. Demographics
Name: Lee Subin
Dates of Implementation:
Number of lessons for this unit: 10
September 3- September 14, 2018
# of students with an IEP: 0
# of students with a GSSP: 5
Analyze the school data from the school report card: Write a narrative synthesizing the instructional data
from the school report card and its impact on this unit. NOTE: Consider this student data as you write
objectives to improve student learning.
The school is classified as a foreign language high school where students achievements in English rate higher
than the average high schools in the same region; however, the school rates lower than the average nationwide
foreign high schools with regards to their achievements in the English section of Korean CSAT (KCSAT).
Considering that foreign language high schools are designed to focus on ELT, they need effective strategies for the
English section of KCSAT. The title of the unit is Introduction to the English section of KCSAT whereby the
students will be required to solve various questions about listening comprehension, reading comprehension,
vocabulary, and grammar throughout the unit.
Describe the community, the school and classroom needs.
Gyeongnam foreign language high school is situated in Yangsan city. People in the area are predominantly
Koreans and very few Asians from other countries. Most of the occupations are associated with
manufacturing. The school itself is located in a suburb area in Yangsan i.e. in the middle of Shinbull Mountain.
Because all the students are required to stay in dormitories, time management could be more flexible than other
schools. They have enough computers for students to use in computer lab. Thus, it would be easier to utilize
technology in order to maximize the benefits of lessons.
Describe how you will differentiate instruction to meet the diverse needs of the students in the classroom.
Because the students levels are still higher than students in average high schools in terms of English fluency,
different versions of the English section of KCSAT will be given for effective instructions. Students are
encouraged to use English to English dictionary; translation-based dictionaries such as English to Korean or
Korean to English may sometimes be allowed depending on students English achievement levels. GSSP students
will be given modified version of KCSAT and be given more challenging assignments.
What impact will this data have for the development of this unit?
This data will impact the development of the unit in a variety of ways. First of all, since individual students will
have different achievement levels, it could help differentiate the level of lessons. In addition, considering the
schools special situation as all the students are staying in dormitories, it would be more convenient to choose
where and when the lessons are being taught. Finally, since there are enough computers for students, they can
utilize a lot of sources through the internet, and teachers could also take advantage of it when organizing lesson
plans.
Describe any critical student characteristics that will affect student learning (include details about
modifications needed for students with an IEP, GSSP, PSP, 504 Plan, ethnic, cultural, racial diversity, or
achievement gaps).
Gyoengnam foreign language high school evaluates students GPA in middle schools before giving admissions.
Because their achievements are definitely higher than average students, expectations will also be slightly high.
More than 99% of students are Koreans who have learned English as a second language. Some students are higher
in English fluency than others because they have been to English speaking countries before. Many of them will be
considered as students with GSSP and receive more challenging assignments than the others.
c. Standards
Connect your goals and objectives to appropriate Kentucky Core Academic Standards (KCAS) and/or
National Standards. Use no more than two or three connections, and if not obvious, explain how each
objective is related to the Kentucky Core Academic Standards (KCAS) and/or National Standards. Right
click on the link below and choose 'open in new tab.'
http://kate.murraystate.edu/resources/pdresource/49/
Describe how your unit will contribute to what Kentucky expects all students to know and be able to do.
My unit will help students to better understand the strategies for the English section of KCSAT. They could
understand the texts or dialogues, and learn how to apply these strategies when they actually deal with KCSAT.
d. Unit Planning
The rationale for this unit is that students are not quite used to the English section of KCSAT, which contains a
number of convoluted texts that need teachers assistance even though their average fluency level in English is
high. This unit will introduce students the strategies that help their understanding of KCSAT. The end result will
be the summative assessment for the unit. Students will actually solve several KCSAT questions so that they can
thoroughly prepare for it. My unit is an introduction to the English section of KCSAT, so it will starts from basics
(e.g. vocabulary and grammar) to application. I hope my unit will lower students pressure on this high-stakes test.
Describe the students' prior knowledge.
Some students may already study for KCSAT by themselves, but that does not mean their studying method is
effective. The mock KCSAT they have already solved are not in the same level as the actual KCSAT. Thus,
regardless of their prior knowledge, all the students will be asked to solve the questions and add the reasons for
their answers.
Identify the content focus concepts and skills you plan to develop in this unit.
In this unit, students will be able to learn essential vocabulary, grammar, reading comprehension skills, and
listening comprehension skills that would help them prepare for the English section of KCSAT
What kinds of sections do the English section of KCSAT has? What are the strategies in order to prepare for the
English section of KCSAT?
What are the steps of the writing process? What does good writing look like?
e. Unit Objectives
List the objectives of what you expect students to KNOW and to be able to DO during this unit. Write these as
performance statements using behavioral terms. There should be no more than 3 unit objectives, and they should
encompass all the lesson objectives of the unit.
1. After instruction, students will be able to improve their vocabulary, grammar, reading comprehension, and
listening comprehension skills
2. After instruction, students will be able to better prepare for the English section of KCSAT .
f. Designing Instructional Strategies and Activities
The number of lessons in this table should be the same as the number of lessons given in the demographics in
'Section a.'
Note: To add more rows to the table, be sure you are using Mozilla Firefox. Then right click in a row, choose
'Row' and then 'Insert Row After.' To delete a row, right click in a row, choose 'Row' and then 'Delete Rows.' (This
method may not work with other browsers besides Firefox.)
Helpful website for this section: http://daretodifferentiate.wikispaces.com/
Attachments
Perks_PowerPoint.ppt
Perks_Rubrics.doc
Unit
Lesson
Lesson
Formative
Objective Objectives/
#
Assessment(s)
#
Learning Targets
1
Objective: After
watching a video, Assessment
Strategies/ Activities: In order to spark interests,
students will be Description: While
students will first watch a reaction video where a lady
able to
watching a video,
studying linguistics in Cambridge University struggles
understand what students will be asked to solve questions from actual KCSAT. There are 3
they are going to to solve the questions questions in total, and students will be given about 5
study in the unit. in the videos. They
minutes to solve each question. After they solve all the 3
will have about 5
questions, they will be divided into 5 groups and
Learning Target: I minutes per question compare the answers. Each group has 1 GSSP student.
can understand (there are 3 questions). After their discussion is over, GSSP student will come
the basic format After the video ends, forward and present their answers with supporting
and level of the they will see whether details. Students will see the last part of the video where
English section of their answers are
they could see the answer key so that students could
KCSAT.
correct or not
compare the answers by themselves
Differentiated
Assessment Plan: The
GSSP students will be
asked to present their
answers with
supporting details in
front of the class.
Pen/pencil
Writers notebook
A reaction video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=pmeyPPBpHFA
Computer
Projector
Computer speakers
Objective: After
reviewing the
vocabulary word
list given in the
last lesson,
students will
Word cards
Assessment
Strategies/ Activities: Students needs to be in a
Description: Students computer lab for this lesson. The instructor will briefly
will try to solve the
review the vocabulary word list from the last class.
actual vocab section of After his/her briefing, students will be given 2 vocab
KCSAT using their
questions from KCSAT. They can possibly download
1
Objective: After
instructors
explicit teaching
of English
grammar,
students will be
given a sentence
based practice
questions.
Assessment
Description: Students
will be using their
smartphones and
participate in grammar
practice questions
through Kahoot! The
number of correct
answer will be
considered for
Learning Target: I summative
can learn a basic assessment.
concept of
English grammar Differentiated
and find right
Assessment Plan: The
answer from the GSSP students will be
grammar practice required to solve
questions.
advanced practice
questions.
Pen/pencil
Writers notebook
Smartphone (optional)
Computer
Projector
Assessment
Objective: After
Description: Students
reviewing the last
will try to solve
class lesson,
grammar questions
students will be
after they review the
able to solve the
last grammar lesson.
grammar section
Whether they answer
of KCSAT. They
correctly or not will
can also make
not be included in
their own
assessment. Their
grammar
understanding of
questions in
grammar will be
KCSAT format.
shown in their own
grammar questions.
They need to turn it in
via e-mail.
Learning Target: I
can solve the
Differentiated
grammar
Assessment Plan: The
questions from
GSSP students, in
KCSAT and
addition to the
actually make
assignment, will have
those questions.
to present their
questions in front of
the classroom.
Objective: After
watching an
episode of
comedy Modern
Family, students
will write a
paragraph of
summarizing the
episode.
Pen/pencil
Writer's notebook
Computer
Projector
1
Assessment
Description: Students
will write a summary
of the episode in
writers notebook
Differentiated
Assessment Plan: The
GSSP students, in
addition to the writing
Learning Target: I assignment, will share
can understand their summaries.
the story through
listening and
summarize it
Pen/pencil
Writer's notebook
Computer
Video:
http://blog.naver.com/gudrldmlsks/10020579748
9
Projector
PowerPoint, Lesson 6
Computer speakers
Objective: After
instruction,
students will be
able to read the
first chapter of
Harry potter and
summarize it.
Assessment
Description: Students
will read aloud the
Harry Potter ch.1.
After they read it, they
will summarize the
text in writers
notebook and share it
Pen/pencil
Writer's notebook
Computer
Projector
Objective: after
Strategies/ Activities: The instructor will review the last
reviewing the last
lessons and handout the 4 reading comprehension
lessons, students Assessment
questions. Students will solve the questions and write
will be able to
Description: Students the reason why they choose it as an answer. They need
solve the reading will be given 4 reading to contradict other 4 options by finding
comprehension comprehension
logical/contextual flaws. After that, they will be grouped
section of
questions. They will together and share their answers and claims with their
KCSAT
solve those questions friends.
and write the reasons
why they choose it as
Learning Target: I an answer. And then,
can read,
they will share it with Differentiated Strategies/ Activities: For the GSSP
understand, and their friends.
students, there will be a time limit to solve those
analyze the texts
questions, which will be 1min~1.5min per question.
from KCSAT.
Differentiated
Because they could finish earlier, the instructor needs to
Assessment Plan: For prepare more KCSAT reading comprehension questions
.
the GSSP students,
for them.
there will be a time
limit to solve those
Media/ Technologies/ Resources:
questions, which will
be 1min~1.5min per
Pen/pencil
question.
Writer's notebook
Computer
Projector
10
Candy sheet
Glossary
Differentiation - The practice of giving students multiple options for taking in information, making sense of ideas,
and expressing what they learn. It provides different avenues to acquire content, to process or make sense of
ideas, and to develop products.
GSSP - Gifted Student Services Plan
Learning Targets - Educational aims or end products which encompass all goals and objectives. These are
2. Lesson Plan
Lesson Plan
Lee Subin
BEFORE READING
Show students a picture and ask them what they are doing. Students may
come up with different ideas
Ask students what SAT stands for
Include a short explanation about the reading materials that will be covered
in the lesson (the English section of Korean SAT).
Show a YouTube video to create interest. Students could be able to see the
level of the English section of Korean SAT and how it looks like.
Ask students how they think about the video
Students may be able to understand what they are going to do during the lesson
and be actively engaged in the class
DURING READING
A student reads aloud the text
Students check/highlight the words that they are not familiar with.
Students solve the question of the English section of Korean SAT on their
own
Students may use other sources such as dictionaries or cell phones to find the
meanings of words
After students find the answer, they need to have a valid reason for their
answers.
Students are asked to demonstrate why they choose it as an answer
Students read and understand the text. While finding a valid reason to an answer,
students may be able to analyze the text.
AFTER READING
Students get into groups (4-5 people per group)
Students compare the answers with their friends
Students discuss what is a correct answer and why the other options cannot
be an answer
Each group presents their best answer with supporting details.
Students are asked to revise their original answers to the questions
Students are able to analyze the text in different perspectives while having a group
work.
AFTER LESSON
Ask students if the question was difficult
Ask students if their answers have changed after a group work
Homework assignment: Try to analyze no 38 on your own for the next class
group activity.
Created Resources
1. Pic-tac-toe
Lee Subin
Linguistics
Musical
Logical-Mathematical
Spatial
Kinesthetic
Interpersonal
Intrapersonal
Naturalist
Date:
1-1
2-2
3-3
4-4
Content
Conclusion
Description
Grammar
Grammar choices
sometimes confuse readers.
meaning.
understand meaning.
Ideas
the piece.
Ideas are confusing and do
not support the main topic in
any way.
Opening
Paragraph
Development
Punctuation
No errors in punctuation.
Sentence Variety
Spelling
Tone
Tone is completely
inappropriate or not present.
Appropriate tone
consistently maintained
throughout the piece.
Total Score:
Teacher Comments:
Technology Proficiency
1. Powerpoint
him whenever he thinks something more than he deserves (Vonnegut 7p). If someone does
not follow the rule, he/she are prisoned and required to pay for his/her misbehaviors.
Harrison, who is a very gifted boy, attempts to change the unfair world, which ultimately led
him to a tragic death. The author does not make any judgements in the story. He rather shows
the readers a fair society and lets them think about it. In Harrison Bergerons society, it is
possible to spot that peoples talent becomes handicaps:
He tried to think a little about the ballerinas. They weren't really very good-no better
than anybody else would have been, anyway. They were burdened with sashweights
and bags of birdshot, and their faces were masked, so that no one, seeing a free and
graceful gesture or a pretty face, would feel like something the cat drug in. George
was toying with the vague notion that maybe dancers shouldn't be handicapped.
Because it is an equal society, individual differences are not allowed. Furthermore, it is fairly
noticeable that not only does the government in the Harrison Bergeron not in favor of those
who are gifted, but they regard peoples gifts as evil:
It was then that Diana Moon Glampers, the Handicapper General, came into the
studio with a double-barreled ten-gauge shotgun. She fired twice, and the Emperor
and the Empress were dead before they hit the floor. Diana Moon Glampers loaded
the gun again. She aimed it at the musicians and told them they had ten seconds to
get their handicaps back on.
As the Handicapper General, who can be the symbol of the power of the government, shots
Harrison Bergeron, who is the Emperor, to death because Harrison was the one who is a
threat to the equal society. To the government, Harrison is an evil boy who takes unfair
advantage of his talents and tries to destroy the perfect world they have created. Thus, it is
quite obvious that the theme that is ruling the story Harrison Bergeron is the concept of social
equality that is so valuable that even though the punishment of the government toward their
people does not fit the crimes that they have committed at all, their sacrifices can be
absolutely justifiable if the equal society may continue to exist.
However, the paper the capital punishment fits the crime: a comparative analysis of the
death penalty and proportionality in the United States of America and the peoples Republic
of China written by Ryan Florio implies a different theme than that of Harrison Bergeron.
The author mainly contrasts the differences of sentencing punishments in China and in the
United States. He states that when understanding the law systems of both countries, it is
important to be aware of what each countries places emphasis on. China is a collectivist
nation where the society values more than individual rights whereas the United States is
basically an individualistic society where fundamental rights of human beings cannot be
neglected (Florio 46p). Both China and the United States adopted quite similar retributive
theory of proportionality, which is to solely focus on the past incidents to sentence
punishments, but it is China that is the leading country in sentencing capital punishments
because they consider the potential problems that the criminals may commit after they are
released from the jail. By contrasting two different countries based on their punishment rules,
Florio evidently highlights the concept of human rights. Although he does not try to point out
which way is right or wrong, it is alluded in the text that human rights may be infringed by
the capital punishment that has been made based on societal goods.
Should people sacrifice their own rights to sustain the society even if punishment on them
does not fit the crime? In Harrison Bergeron, gifted people get punishments because if they
are outperforming in some ways, the society will not be equal. In other words, it is necessary
for the government in equal society to restrict human rights in order to sustain the social
system. Furthermore, it is justifiable to punish those who have some talents even though they
have not committed any crimes. For the government in Harrison Bergeron, gifted people are
criminals who may have enormous potentialities to destroy the equal world that they have
created. Thus, it is possible to assert that the value of society can kill the value of individual
rights in Harrison Bergeron. The author of the capital punishment fits the crime however
addresses that capital punishments can restrict the human rights. He stresses that China will
stay as a world leader in violating human rights if they keep sentencing people to death for
the society. Contrary to Harrison Bergeron, the author places more emphasis on human rights
than on societal goods, and this may be possibly because the concept of individualism is so
widespread in 21st century. People are now living in the society where the human rights are
more important than ever before. There are relatively a small number of people who dare try
to restrict individual rights. However, because all the people deserve human rights and
therefore are free to take advantage of their outstanding capabilities, society becomes less
equal than ever before. Some may argue that people who are not gifted are discriminated
against those who are gifted and therefore have a huge power that the ungifted cannot even
earn no matter how they try. People in Harrison Bergeron cannot take advantage of their
talents but are all equal in that some may not overpower the others. Although the society in
Harrison Bergeron is not perfect, the fact that the government in Harrison Bergeron values
social equality more than anything may make those who are living in free yet unequal society
feel like they need social equality. At the same time, the capital punishment fits the crime
helps the readers to rethink about how important human rights are these days. Thus, it might
be an ideal case that social equality and individual rights are balanced so that one cannot take
over the other.
In conclusion, by synthesizing Harrison Bergeron and the paper the capital punishment
fits the crime, it is possible to find conflicting themes from them: social equality versus
individual rights. There are a lot of themes that can be found in writings if readers took a
close look into the social backgrounds in writings. Try to synthesize two different themes,
and it might be possible to create new interpretations out of it.
Works Cited
Vonnegut, Kurt. Harrison Bergeron. Welcome to the Monkey Hose: A Collection of Short
Works. New York: Delacorte Press, 1968. Print.
Florio, Ryan. The Capital Punishment Fits the Crime: A Comparative Analysis of the Death
Penalty and Proportionality in the United States of America and the Peoples
Republic of China. University of Miami International and Comparative Law
Review. 2009. Web, 08 March 2016.