Depth
‘Thomas Myers, Certified Advanced Rolfer
e all value Rolfing® as depth
bodywork onmany levels. But
depth has been a problem for
Rolfing since its inception. Part of the rea-
son that Rolfing got such a reputation for
painis that da Rolf kept exhorting her stu-
dents to "go deeper” Those ofus who were
juststarting out in this business, in the frst
rush of pioneering enthusiasm, took “go
deeper” to mean “go harder.” It was PER-
HAPSalimitation inher teaching, and def-
nitely a limitation in our understanding
“More than two decades later, the teaching
of depth in Rolfing and structural integra-
tion schools has changed considerably,
‘though the reputation lingers on.
My own journey ito depth was changed
by Ida Rolf herself in a singular moment.
1211978 1 was in the midst of my advanced
‘raining with her Asittumed out, this was
De Rolf’ last training - she was to die of
congestive heart failure and complications
from rectal cancer less than six months later
at the age of 83. During this training, she
spent most of her time in a wheelchair al-
though she could still walk for short dis-
tances. Mostly she directed the work of th-
es, though she ocasionally would do some
hands-on work herself
During this time, I was fortunate to have
‘work from her several times, and to my
surprise, the work was not painful at al.
Her hands had such authority that my tis-
sue was persuaded to move seemingly of
itself. This contrasts sharply with the expe-
rience of a number of English osteopaths
who studied with her in the 50's and early
“G's. Toa person - and I contacted a num-
ber of them when I moved to London in
the early ‘80's - they lauded Ida’s knowl-
edge, perception, and efficacy, but said that
she put her clients through far more pain
than they themselves could ever counte-
‘nance in their own practices.
Back to this particular afternoon, I was
working with Tweed, my model. Tweed
M4
‘was a nurse, a bright and gentle soul who
‘unfortunately was compelled tolive witha
severe idiopathic scoliosis, which had
strongly distorted her rib cage and spine.
At that time, I was living and working in
Little Rock, Arkansas, and Tweed, who had
benefited greatly from our first 10-session
series (I had leamed a lot too), had trav-
eled all the way to Philadelphia to be my
‘model for advanced sessions under Ida
Rolf's direction. This afternoon, Rolf's eyes
‘were going from watchful to baleful to in-
creasingly frustrated. Tweed was seated on
a bench, slowly bending forward over her
knees, while I stood behind her, using the
flat of my knuckles to open the locked
myofascia in her knotted erectors.
Ida Rolf was fidgeting in her wheelchair,
saying “Get in there, man!” - at which I
would redouble my efforts, and Tweed
would grin and bear it as her back got red-
der-but not longer. Finally, Rolf could take
it no more: she wheeled her chair over
‘loser to the back ofthe bench, barking my
shins with the footrest. Shejammed on the
wheelchair brakes so the chair wouldn’t
‘move, and then leaned way forward. At full
reach from the chair she was ust ableto put
two gnarled fingertips on either side of
‘Tweed’ sinuous tral of spinous processes,
Slowly her fingertips traveled down
‘Tweed’s twisted spine.
‘Tweed, who was bent forward and so did
not know Rolf and I had changed places,
cried, “that’s it, now you've got it” as her
back started to let go of another layer of
Tongrheld tension. At this moment I real-
ized that depth was going to be an elusive
‘and hard-won property. I this failing litle
‘ldlady could achieve more depth with two
fingertips at full reach out of a wheelchair
than T could in my young prime, standing
right over the client with my fists firmly
placed in her back, then certainly going
deeper and going harder were not remotely
equated.
wow soltorg
Of course, a truer language of depth has
suffused our profession in the years since.
Here isa summary list of my current think-
ing on the components of depth, with a brief
explanation following:
1. The three ins: tention invitation and.
information
2. Practitioner body use
3.Client movement
4. Slower is better
5. Knowing the anatomy
6. Resonance
1) A dlear intention precedes your fingers
into the tissues, so that mind and body are
aligned. Do you know what your intention
‘seach time you enter the field ofthe other
person? Having a clear intent makes achiev-
lng depth so much easier for both of you.
Each move is also an invitation love this
word, it means “bringing life in” ~an invi-
tation to greater awareness, greater move-
ment, greater relaxation. If your hands are
suffused with the atitude of invitation as
you come into the body, the waves of ten-
sion and resistance partinfrontof you, and
depth is more easily found. And finaly,
each move informs brings in form. Thatis
the uniqueness of bodywork: Deane juhan,
tells us: Nothing is added but information,
rothing is subtracted but what the body lets
{00f Hands-on workis essentially an edu-
«ative process. f- and Iam talking to my-
sel as well - we come into the body with
the intention of informing the tissues, giv-
ing them information they might be miss-
ing, our work is very different from when
we come in with the intention of fixing it
breaking up that fascial adhesion stretch-
ing that spasmodic muscle, annihilating
that tigger point, whatever.
2) Effective body use on the practitioner's
partis second essential element-use your
muscles and your force to change tissue,
and the disturbance to the client will be
much greater than if you use your bones
and your weight. Not only will you gener-
ate resistance in your client if you muscle
‘your way in, but yourhands and shoulders
will ikely not serve you well for along ca-
reer. The absolute minimum force to get the
job done while maintaining maximum sen-
sitivity to the many levels of the client's
state, both local and global, is our goal here.
Good practitioner body use, seen in this
light, becomes more than a good idea, i's
the law.
Sravcrueat Bracaamow / Jose 2002mes FRET VES
‘The law in question is the Weber-Fechner
law, which states that a muscle (via the
muscle spindles) is sensitive to changes
‘equal to or greater than 1/40th of the load
on that muscle. In other words, the more
muscular tension Thave in my body, theless
sersitive I (as practitioner) am going to be
about changes in the client'sbody. And vice
versa - the more relaxed and lazy I can be,
the more exquisitely I will enter into the
dient’s kinesthetic world, feeling the
‘myriad changes in the thythms and tissues
ofhis or her body.
4)Dr Rolf aid “putit whereitbelongsand
«all for movement.” Too many forget the
last part - especially those who come to
Rolfing from massage, where the client is
‘often thought of as a more passive recipi-
‘ext Of course, movement is good for the
clients experience -keeping them engaged,
activating the body image, resetting
muscles’ “tone-o-stat” and dispelling sen-
sorimotor amnesia. But less recognized is
how important itis forthe practitioner that
the client is moving, When the client
moving, the practitioner can feel exactly
‘what level of depth his work is reaching,
“Ty doing the familiar retinacular release on
the front ofthe ankle that (at least in my
day) often occurred near the opening ofthe
2nd session - try it on one side with the fa
niliar foot up and down’ motions, and on
the other side without the motion. Is it not
much harder to feel what level your hand
‘is contacting?
4) Speed isthe enemy of depth - the faster
you go, the more resistance you generate.
‘Waiting and sinking and swimming slowly
‘though the tissue takes a litle longer, but,
like the tortoise, wins the race. How fast is
determined by two simple questions. First,
{sthetissue melting in front of your fingers?
you have to pry it open, you are going
too fast. If nothing is happening and you
are bored, you ate probably going too
slowly. Iftis melting jus in front of your
hand (or elbow or whatever), you are sit-
ting inthe Goldilocks seat just right. The
second question sin your perception of the
client is she trying to get away from what
you are doing? If your work includes the
client having what Ida Rolf called “the
‘motor intention to withdraw,” then, in my
opinion, you are going too fast.
Iwill admit that I make rare exceptions to
this when confronted with physically rau-
ratized areas where there is so much pain
stored in the myofascial tissues that I will
Srmocrnas Tareceanon / Jose 2002
‘occasionally cross this barrier into directly
painful touch. This is with the conscious
consent of the client, only after a rapport is
established, and the intent is definitely to
‘expose’ thestored pain, not‘impose’ more
pain.
5) Admitting my prejudice - I am an
‘anatomy teacher I find that depth is also a
function of ever more precise knowledge
of exactly what is under your hands. If 1
‘can reconstruct the picture of where Iam
in my memory and connect that image to
‘what Iam feeling in my hands, my intu-
ition and my ability to go deep improve by
Jeaps and bounds. If am lost in a wash of
tissues whose orientation and purpose Iam
not clear about, my intuitions become
‘vague and fairly useless.
6) Last but by no means least s the concept
and experience of resonance. There are 50
‘many thythms in the body - the rise and
{all of breathing, the beat of the heart, the
hum of metabolism, the buzz of the brain
‘waves, the idling purr of muscle tonus. the
bb and flow ofthe cranial pulse the deeper
wash of the long tide, the irregular grumble
of peristalsis, the reciprocal metronome of
walking, and perhaps a hundred more