Download as pdf
Download as pdf
You are on page 1of 8
CIMCAHME HA BBIITAPCKOTO TEONOFMYECKO APYKECTBO, ron. 59, xu. 1, 1998, c. 33-40 REVIEW OF THE BULGARIAN GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY, vol. 59, part 1, 1998, p. 33-40 Ornocuo B3pactta Ha GeruTe BapoBHun mpH c. penta, Exeucko (Wsrovex pen6ankan) Todop Huxoazos', Bepnap Heubepnec’, Kpucmaauna Cmotikoea’, Pumap Iusax’, Mapun Heanos’, Mapu-7Ko3e Poxdexas-Banes* Teonozwrecku uncmumym npu BAH, BG-1113 Cogsus, E-mail: tnikolov@geology.bas.bg; stoykova@geology. bas. bg 2Universié Paul-Sabatier, Toulouse, E-mail: dybassed@cict.fr *Cogiuitexu ynueepcumem “Ca. Ka. Oxpudcxu”, Cogius, E-mail: mivanov@uni-gea.sofia.bg T. Nikoloy, B. Peybernés, K. Stoykova, R. Ciszac, M. Ivanov, M.-J.Fondecave-Wallez. 1998. About the age of the white limestones at the Village of Drenta, Elena District (East Fore-Balkan). Rev. Bulg. Geol. Society, 59,1, 3340. . In the vicinity of the Villlage of Drenta, Elena area, a couple of small spots of white massive biogenic and/or biodetrtic limestones are exposed. Their texture is of ‘grainstone’ type, with shelly debris or ‘mudstone’ (micrite with debris) Rare quartz grains are also present. The age of these limestones is still under discussion and varies within a broad stratigraph- ic interval. They had been assigned to the Barremian (Urgonian type), Senonian or Paleogene. Recently they are considered as ? Paleogene, Analogous limestones crop out as isolated spots or thin, broken stripes to the North of Drenta — between the village of Voneshta boda and Tryavna. In the present study various microfossils are recorded: nannoflora, planktonic and benthic foraminifera and algae. Plank- tic forams and algae data indicate a Selandian age (Zone P3a — lower part, Morosovella angulata — Ignonia interval sub- zone) for the lower part of the section, since the nannofossil data clearly restrict the middle part of the section to the base of the Upper Paleocene (Thanetian) (Fig. 2). A moderately rich nannofossil assemblage has been recovered, containing the species Discoaster mokleri (NP7-9), D. drieveri (NP6-7), D. delicatus (NP7-8), D. lenticularis (NP7-10), Fasciculithus tym- paniformis (NP5-9), Toweius pertusus (NPS-11), Prinsfus martinii (NP3-7), P bisulcus (NP4-9). The co-occurrence of Dis- ‘coaster mohleri D. drieveri and D. delicatus indicates a Late Paleocene age equivalent to the NP7 nannofossil zone. The lowermost and the uppermost parts of the section are barren or contain poorly preserved, non-diagnostic nannofossils. This circumstance impeded the more exact definition of the chronostratigraphic interval of deposition of the limestones near Drenta. ‘A Late Paleocene (Thanetian) age is proved for the limestones in the middle and upper part of the section, but we do not ignore the possibility of Selandian age assignment for its lowermost part. It should be noted that a lot of benthic forams, as well as macrofaune remains are redeposited. The siliciclastic wedge at the middle of the section (packet No 6-9) contains many glauconite grains and intraclasts, and exhibits signs of condensation. ‘The limestones near Drenta are related to the Komarevo Formation, The regional changes in lithology (as a significant domination of detritic, biaclastic limestones and siliciclastic packets with glauconite) are due to the circumstance that they ‘were deposited in the outer margin of the carbonate platform. Two sequence units are recognised in the study section, and possible correlations with the Upper Paleocene sequences in Gabrovo area are presented (Fig. 2, 3). The isolated outcrops near the Village of Furevtzi, Damianovtzi and Stanchov khan demonstrate similar lithology and successions. They should be included in the Komarevo Fm. as well, and are possibly of Late Paleocene age. The limestones near Drenta are correlatable to the Komarevo limestones in NE Bulgaria. They are synchronous to the marls of the Bojuritza Fm in the Central North Bulgaria, Key words: limestones, calcareous nannofossils, planktic foraminifera, Late Paleocene, East Fore-Balkan T. Nikolov, B. Peybernts, K. Stoykova, R. Ciszac, M. Ivanov, M.-J. Fondecave- Wallez. 1998. A propos de l'dge des calcaires de Drenta (Prébalkan Oriental). Rev. Soc. Geol. bulg., 59, 1, 31—3t Résumé. Aux environs du village de Drenta, arrondissement d’Elena (Prébalkan Oriental) sont connus quelques petits ‘affleurements des calcaires blancs massifs et détritiques. Leurs textures sont de type grainstone (sparite), parfois lumach- ellique, ou mudstone (micrite & debris). Le quartz détritique est présent, mais rare, Leur age exact a été jusqu’a présent assez contreversé dans un intervalle stratigraphique tres large: Ces calcaires ont été ainsi rapportés au Barremien (a facies urgon- ien), au Senonien, ou au Paléogine. Quelques auteurs récents considerent qu'ils ont probablement un age paléogine. Des calcaires analogiques existent également, mais avec un aspect different, & l'Ouest du village de Drenta — entre le village de Vonesta Voda et la vile de Tryavna. ‘Au cours de nos recherches, nous avons recueilli de nouvelles données micropaléontologiques, fournies par les Nannofos- siles, les Foraminiféres (planctoniques et benthiques) et les Algues, vertes et rouges. Les Foraminiféres planctoniques et les Algues indiquent un ige'Sélandien “inferieur” (parte inféreure dela sous-zone Pte, ou sous-zone dintervalle a Morazovela ‘angulata — Ignonina) . La nannoflore donne, pour la partie moyenne de la coupe de Drenta, un age plut6t Paléocéne supérieur ‘basal (Thanetien) (fig. 2) Llassociation de Discoaster mohleri, D. drieveri et D. deticatus dans la nannoflore observée signe la zone NP 7 du Paleoctne “supérieur”. Les parties extréme (base et sommet) de la coupe se sont révélées stériles ou contiennent une biophase non caracteristique et mal conservée. A cause de cela, on ne peut pas mieux preciser Vintervalle stratigraphique de l'ensemble des calcaires blancs de Drenta. On le situe dans le Paleocene “supérieur” sensu (ato. Il faut aussi reflechir a V’etat encroute et souvent nettement resédimenté de la plupart des taxons observés, les Foraminiferes notamment. L'intercalation plus terri- 5 Cnncanne wa Bunrapcxoro reosoruuecko apyxectso, xv.1 33 gine (grts glauconieux) de la partie moyenne du profil (horizons NN 6-9) correspond & une probable surface condensé (pic de glauconie et haute énergie). ‘Les “calcaires blancs de Drenta” font partie de Ia Formation de Komarevo. Les variations regionales de leur lithologie se traduisent par une augmentation du detritisme et du caractére biogine en fonction des divers paléoenvironnements de la plate-forme carbonatée externe. Au long de la coupe etudiée, deux séquences de depot successives sont distinguées. Elles permettent de proposer des corrélations avec les séquences homologues du Paléoctne supérieur des environs de la ville de Gabrovo (fig. 2, 3). Les affleurements isolés de Farevtzi, Damianovtzi et Stanchov Han sont lithologiquement semblables et leur age Paleocene supérieur peut étre propost. Les calcaires de Drenta sont les equivalents lateraux a la fois des calcaires dela Formation de Komarevo de 1a Bulgarie du Nord Est et des marnes de la Formation de Bojouritza de la Bulgarie du Centre Nord. Mots-clés: calcaires, nannofossiles, foraminifera, Paléoctne, Prébalkan Buneqenne B oxonsoctute xa c. [[penta, Encucko ormapna ca HSBECTHH HAKONKO MA/IKH pasKpuTAs Ha Germ Ma- CHBHM OpraxoreHuM H/amM GHOeTpHTYCHH Bapo- Buu (TeKcTypa Tam grainstones (cnapHTH) c WeTPH- Tyc m Tun mudstones (MHKPHTH C AeTpHTyc). Bes- pacTTa HM ocera OcTaBa JUCKYCHOHHAa H Ce oupe- Tena B eqUH 3HaYHTeTeH CTpaTHTpadcKM METepBAM Mexmy Gapema # naneoreaa. AvasorHaHa BapOBHL ce pa3kpHBaT KATO OTMCNHA NeTHA WIH Ma/IKH, YeCTO paskECcaHH MBMUM H Ha 3anag oT [penta — MexIy c, Bouema Boga u Tpasxa, Kaxto # oxo Ta6pozo (par. 1). Te maar crenmpwino macto 8 crpaturpad- CKHTe HOCHeqOBAaTeAHOCTH H ce HaGMOMaBAT HenO- cpeqeTseno mpey smuusta na Hapmane Ha HsT09- HoOankancKata 30a Bepxy [Ipen6ankaua (Llaxxos H ap., 1995; Kpuues 8 Kanes x ap., 1995). ‘Hamero pramanne Gene npuaseveHo oT TesH BapOBMI He CaMO TlopayM TAXHATa HeycTaHOBeHa BBSPACT, HO CBLIO MOpatH pawtH4HOTO THNKyBaHe Ha TSXHOTO pasNONOReHMe B paspesutTe, KAKTO HC ormey a ce HanpaBaT HAKOM KOpenanlHH C aHaso- TH4HH BapOBHUH B IpyrH paliony. Tipes ecenra wa 1996 r. uact or aptopure (TH., BIL, PIL. « MM.) nposene na6momenue Bapxy BEMPOCHHTe BAPOBHIM, PASKPHTH B H3TOMHHA Kpall na c. [Ipenta, up crapure papuuis. Ocuosnara act o7 ce6panua Matepuas Gente o6paGoTen or B. Tleii6epuec (Gentocum tbopamanndepH H ara), M.K. Monyexas-Bayes (1aHKTOHHH cbopaMHHH- éepa) » xa6oparopuure ua Yaupepcurera “Elon CaGarue” (Tyaysa). [IpoGure sa nanopnopa Gaxa o6paGorenm u anamuaupann ot K. Croiixona B Teonormeckus nuctutyr wa BAH, Or cpos crpana TL Haxoxos u M. isasios nposegoxa somssinuTestiH HaGMONeHMA BLPXY pasKpHTWstTa Ha BapOBBIDA MEX- ay c. Bortema soma m TpsBxa. Benexku 3a jocerawata u3yyeHocT Karo waKmouHM mspalire HacieoBaTenM Ha paiiowa 3narapcxu (1905, 1910) u T: Bouyen (1925, 1927), XOHTO Tlo HTONOKKM aHaOTHH OTHACAT pastex- WaNHTe BapOBHUW KEM ceHoHa, LlanKos (1947) 3a MepBH WET BHSMpa TOWHO PasKPHTMATA TPH C. Tpenra. Tos astop orbensana, 1e BpXy ITMHECTATE MaTepHamH Ha T.Hap. OT Hero Orpasled danuec Ha HeOKOMa “HOpMauHO Ce pasTiouiara enMH OCTaTSK OT nosuaTaa B TspHoncko Ga Gapemca BapoBik ¢ Muoro BKaMeHemOCTH, MERAY KOHTO MpeacTaBK- Tenure wa musa Pseudocidaris clunifera Loriol ca vail-wso6mmin” (loc. cit., c. 163). Tosa mnenwe ce 34 ‘mr. 1. Pasmpoerpanemme wa maneouenexwre cequMenTH 5 Ta6posexo m Exencxo 1/= pasepiraa wa nancouena, nsvecram 20 macroamloTo wacnemDaNe; 2 — pasxpurres na mayverrre 2 rasm paGora napommns: 3— paspes Fig. 1. Distribution of the Upper Paleocene sediments in the Gabrovo-Elena area and location of the studied outcrops of limestones 1 — outcrops of the Paleocene known to now; 2— outcrops recently studied by the authors; 3 — sections suampuema ot E, Boxes (1955). Xpucros (1955) ompenens ceuyo karo GapeMcKH avallOrm4aHH BapOBAUM, PaskpHTH OKoNO c.c. Ion- represna, Koeaux, Monosun, Pepesns, Jamaxosun joKbM Bowetla Bona, KaTo TH UpH4HCAIBA KEM T. Hap. ropa yproncKH BapopanM, Criopen Hero Tesh BaPOBHI.1eKAT BEDXY T. Hap. JONAH OPOHTOAMAEH slacToRe, KOeTO TOH OKa3Ba CBC SapHCOBKa Ha pas- pesa mpi c. Monrepresnu (loc. cit., c. 11, dur. 6). Beacnopuo e, ¥e Topa ca ceillwre BapOBHIIH KaKTO mpx c. [Ipenra, HO roq10xKaTa HM B TOSH paitow (Apaoncxo) ¢ or ropuopaiawxHucKuTe cenMMcHTH ‘Our. 2, Jeronomen m Goocuamm nocaenonaresHocTH » paspesa pu TIpexra va Baromienckata cBira, a He OT “OmHHTe Op6uTO- JIMHEH TLIacTOBe”. Canysos (1957) pasrmexsa BbmpocuHTe Bapo- pun Mexay c.c. Manxn Cransonun 4 Crosuopii, oxono c. Dspeannt 1OKbM c. Bonemia BONA KATO WacT OT MACTPHXTCKHS eT@x. Kauven (1962) ornacs saponnnure or [pena KEM cepepHus Tun cenoH. Toil e MEpBHAT aBTOP, Koiiro onpesiesieHo cBup3na Te3H BapOBHUK ¢ BapO- BHIHTe OT MecTATa H3TOMHO OT c. CTAHYOB XaH, KEM Max. OnaHH H foxHo oT B. BemHospsx, mpHemaiinn oGave Heupavuuno, ue Te 3ansrar HancAKE AC BPXY Fig. 2. Lithology and fossil successions of the Drenta section Lithology Sequences | Calcareous nannofossils| ee Algae cr 4 «TST voeSae. T — SB2— 16 ‘e 15 jas . az “ETS zaé< 5 g = 2 HST : a- zg ona: ’ 5 ee; . 2 ori: 1 eed gE. 3 Bi ‘ ls fiald 3 my ' gs gSsSs8S|8 ER8lsh § oe S352 (5388 A Le . = Sea /PSLRSE|SSESE/SE = ant pHa SGoe FEE gu 5 SERESE lec Rg alee ss. ae? g SSS SES/SSPSSSE z i Perea = SPSSRG/STOSS | SP

You might also like