Professional Documents
Culture Documents
421 Exam 2
421 Exam 2
421 Exam 2
SS
1106.92
703.50
703.50
51.83
1862.25
DF
3
2
2
6
11
MS
368.97
351.75
351.75
8.64
F value
Prob > f
40.72
40.72
0.0003
0.0003
A fisher LSD procedure indicates that solution 3 is significantly different that the other two
solutions.
2) Analysis of variance:
Source
Model
A
B
B2
AB
AB2
Pure error
total
SS
2.412
1.509
1.780
1.906
2.262
64373.93
6579.33
2.418
DF
8
2
1
1
2
2
18
26
MS
3.015
75432.26
1.780
1.906
1.131
32186.96
365.52
F value
824.77
206.37
4869.13
521.39
309.39
88.06
Prob > f
< 0.0001
< 0.0001
< 0.0001
< 0.0001
< 0.0001
< 0.0001
The analysis of variance table shows that factors, Glass Type A and Temperature B are
significant, as well as interaction AB. B2 and AB2 interaction terms are also significant. The
interaction and pure quadratic terms are shown in the plot shown below. For glass types 1
and 2 the temperature is mostly linear, for glass type 3, there is a quadratic effect.
3)
Analysis of variance:
Source
Model
A
B
Residual
Total
SS
5.24
0.58
4.66
2.15
7.39
DF
5
3
2
6
11
MS
1.05
0.19
2.33
0.36
F value
2.92
0.54
6.49
Prob > f
0.1124
0.6727
0.0316
B)
Term Intercept
A
B
AB
Lack of fit
Pure error
Effects
-0.31725
0.586
0.2815
SS
0.40259
1.37358
0.316969
0
3.82848
% Contribution
6.79865
23.1961
5.35274
0
64.6525
Analysis of variance:
Source
Model
A
B
AB
Residual
Lack of fit
Pure error
Total
SS
0.40
1.37
0.32
0.32
3.83
0.000
3.83
5.92
DF
3
1
1
1
12
0
12
15
MS
0.70
0.40
1.37
0.32
0.32
F value
2.19
1.26
4.31
0.99
Prob > f
0.1425
0.2833
0.0602
0.3386
0.32
D)