Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lesson 5
Lesson 5
Learning Objectives
Objective: Students will compare the history of Edward Little High School to what they know
about education reform at the national level.
Students will know: Edward Little High School, Lewiston Falls Academy, Edward Little,
Edward Little Institute, Community Little Theater, The Fire of 1943, accreditation, Auburns
Vision 2020, the current rating of the high school,
Students will be able to: Analyze the ways in which Edward Little High School has changed
throughout the years beginning in 1835 up to the present as well as consider how the more recent
education reforms have impacted the rating and accreditation of their high school. Through this
analysis, they will be able to create a strong proposal for how the school could be reformed if
they received state funding.
Assessments
Formative: Together as a class we will create a map of the schools in Auburn that explain the
history of each school so we can understand how Edward Little has changed since 1835.
Individually, you will reflect on the history of Edward Little through the lens of education
reform. Summative: Create a proposal for how Edward Little could be reformed based on your
knowledge of the history of Edward Little, the history of education reform in the United States,
and your own personal experience from attending the school.
STANDARDS (use Common Core, Maine Learning Results, Next Generation Science
Standards, Schools Standards, ISTE Standards Students or combination)
Understands the major US social, political, and economic reforms on a society during
specific time period. (SS.02.HSR.01.02)
Understand the impact of social, political, and economic reform on US history over time.
(SS.03.HSR.01.02)
Understands how social, political, and economic reforms of the past impact current
events in the US. (SS.04.HSR.01.02)
Rationale
This lesson connects to all of the learning targets used by Edward Little High School
because it addresses the reforms of their own high school in the current time period and makes
them consider how these reforms are politically, socially, and economically charged. This lesson
also addresses how Edward Little High School itself has been reformed throughout time based
on its own independent changes and on the national reforms. Through analyzing both of these
forms of reform, students will be able to understand the local current events going on within their
school and participate in the conversation through proposing their own reforms.
Integration of Other Content Areas
This lesson connects to geography and GIS because of the formative assessment where
we make a map of the history of schools in Auburn. This helps students understand the real
world use of GIS and geography to help us draw connections and correlations between data we
have collected. This lesson also has a strong focus on independent research so students know
how to go about researching an issue and proposing their thoughts and solutions to fix the issue.
Instructional Strategies to Differentiate Instruction
This lesson begins with students doing self-directed learning because we work together to
ask questions about the history of Edward Little that became our research questions for the rest
of the lesson. After having time to research independently, we brought this information together
through creating a map of all the schools of Auburn and combining our research in the
description section of each map point. Finally, students will use these skills they used in the first
half of the lesson to complete their full summative assessment where they use their
understanding of education reform to propose reforms to Edward Little High School. This
proposal will be entirely differentiated because each group can show their ideas in whatever
format they find easiest.
Modifications/Accommodations/Extensions
Absence: If students are absent during this lesson, they may go to my website under their
class tab and read the description of the lesson as well as the notes that were taken and any
electronic activities. For the activities that were not possible to post on the site, students should
seek out me, Mr. Latuscha, or Mr. Closson to find out what they missed. If they were absent for
the second half of the lesson in which the summative assessment was explained, students should
contact me as soon as possible to find out which group they will be in as well as what their topic
will be. If students miss any of the work days, they need to be in contact with their group
members to find out what they will have to do outside of class in order to be on track for the next
work day.
IEP Accommodations:
Student A: Since this student requires accommodations surrounding organization
I will make sure that all directions/expectations regarding activities in the classroom as well as
the summative assessment are clearly explained and available on my website so they may have
access to the directions at any time. This student also has difficulty staying on task so I will
observe them during the lesson and redirect them if I feel they are no longer paying attention or
if I have lost them in one way or another. While this student is working in the groups, I will
make sure they fully understand what their group is asking of them as well as that they are
staying on task so they are not hindering the progress of the group. I believe this student will
excel with the final project because they are very interested in creating change and using
technology in the classroom effectively.
What: Students will learn the history of Edward Little High School through the lens of
education reform which will help them understand the current political situation that the school is
currently facing regarding accreditation.
Why: Through understanding the history of the town and school, students will understand
how to get their voices heard in a constructively in the community. Students should create
informed opinions about what is going on in the world around them and through creating their
proposals they will have practices with appropriately voicing their opinions and suggesting
reasonable solutions.
How:
Day 1:
-Hook: How do all of these reforms affect you? Why do they matter enough for us to spend so
much time talking about them?
-Goal: Learn about the history of Edward Little but also start to build research skills.
-Long term goal: Get better at researching so you can develop your skills for final project (your
proposal for a new Edward Little High School)
-Develop research questions
-How are we going to answer these? - What are good resources and how can you find them?
-Scavenger Hunt
-Share what we have found.
Day 2:
-15 extra minutes to finish the scavenger hunt
-Historical Millinocket Map
-Create Historical Auburn Map
-Time to work on "The History of Edward Little Reflection"
Day 3:
-Introduce what the project is
-Figure out the groups based on how you think about what we should do to fix the school
-Talk to people next to you about what you would do to improve the school. (Everything:
Culture, Building, Curriculum, etc.?)
-Brainstorm how ideas of how to improve school
-Divide up into groups based on these solutions (so everyone agrees on the biggest solution to
the new EL.)
-Designate group roles
-Facilitator (leader)
-Scribe/record keeper
-Time keeper
-Researcher
-Facilitated work time.
-With Ms. McLean: As a group set up a google doc planning document. -**Share with me!!!
-As a group work to determine the problems you want to address in your proposal and your
solutions.
Example 2:
-Introduction
-Problem 1
-Problem 2
-Problem 3
-Problem 2
-Solution 2
-Evidence for 2
-Problem 3
-Solution 3
-Evidence for 3
-Conclusion
-Solution 1
-Evidence for solution 1
-Solution 2
-Evidence for solution 2
-Solution 3
-Evidence for solution 3
-Conclusion
*Scribe Task - Put this outline on your planning doc on google drive that is shared with Ms.
McLean.
Step 2: (Maximum 5 minutes) Decide how you are going to present the information. It can be in
any format that you want. Ex. Podcast, Keynote, Website, Video, etc. Each presentation should
only be a maximum of 10 minutes.
*Check in with Ms. McLean - How are you going to present your proposal and what help do you
need from her?
Step 3: (40 minutes) Create the presentation. It will probably be helpful if you designate certain
tasks to different people in the group so the final product comes together quickly.
Step 4: (20 minutes) Practice your presentation.
*Check in with Ms. McLean - How did your presentation come out? Do you feel ready for
Friday?
Day 6:
-Present Projects
-Do Group Work Reflections
-Re-do pre-assessment
Reflection
I am very very very pleased with how this lesson went! My students loved getting the
chance to learn about their community and to teach me instead of the other way around. They all
participated equally and loved teaching me about their community as we created our historical
map of Auburn. This was very powerful for me because I got to see the amazing effects of
letting students guide their own learning and answer their own questions. I had been worried that
the lesson would flop because students would not be engaged but in hindsight this turned out to
be one of my best lessons and we did not miss any of the content that I had hoped to cover; if
anything the students took it even more in depth than I had expected and seemed to be more
engaged than ever!
I had also been concerned about how successful the final project would be because I was
asking so much of them. For this group of kids that needs a lot of scaffolding and are not often
trusted with large self directed projects like this, I had been concerned that they would be too
overwhelmed. However, I was pleasantly surprised by how effective scaffolding the progress of
each day was. This made this huge task into something that was absolutely manageable for every
student and reduced their stress because each day they realized they were making progress and
would be completely ready for the presentation by the end of the week. Each presentation went
very well and I felt that each group had very valid points about their school and offered
constructive and do-able suggestions to address the problems they see. I was very proud of my
students.
Only on group did not finish a presentation. This group did not communicate well and
therefore one student felt they were doing all of the work while the other two did nothing. While
this was not true, the student still had reason to feel this way because they would not
communicate the progress they had made. This group broke apart on the last work day and
refused to present together. Although their grade was affected because they did not present, I still
allowed them to pass in all of their prep work (since this is actually the most valuable part of my
assessment of what they have learned). I gave them the option to have a one on one interview
with me to tell me their ideas and get most of the credit for the project. Although this was a
stressful situation for me to handle, I feel that I handled it well and that their learning was not
affected negatively because the project was more about the process than the final presentation. It
was a valuable learning experience for the students as well because they were given the chance
to reflect on the issue in their post-project reflection survey.
I was impressed with how this project turned out but I felt that it was not enough of proof
that they had met all of the learning goals. Therefore I had students go back and redo my preassessment after all of the presentations were done. When I combined the way the projects turned
out with their new answers to the essential questions, I felt that I had sufficient proof that they
not only met the learning goals but also knew how to apply their understanding of change within
society to create their proposals.