The document outlines a rubric for evaluating team projects with multiple criteria. It awards points for including a checklist or rubric, addressing at least 3 dimensions, including a unique dimension, and applying all components. Dimensions are scored, with penalties for unreasonable ones and bonuses for more than 3 dimensions. Students also evaluate each other on a scale from 1 to 5 points based on their contribution as a leader, common member, or obstacle to the project. The maximum possible score is 150 points and the minimum is -20 points.
The document outlines a rubric for evaluating team projects with multiple criteria. It awards points for including a checklist or rubric, addressing at least 3 dimensions, including a unique dimension, and applying all components. Dimensions are scored, with penalties for unreasonable ones and bonuses for more than 3 dimensions. Students also evaluate each other on a scale from 1 to 5 points based on their contribution as a leader, common member, or obstacle to the project. The maximum possible score is 150 points and the minimum is -20 points.
The document outlines a rubric for evaluating team projects with multiple criteria. It awards points for including a checklist or rubric, addressing at least 3 dimensions, including a unique dimension, and applying all components. Dimensions are scored, with penalties for unreasonable ones and bonuses for more than 3 dimensions. Students also evaluate each other on a scale from 1 to 5 points based on their contribution as a leader, common member, or obstacle to the project. The maximum possible score is 150 points and the minimum is -20 points.
The document outlines a rubric for evaluating team projects with multiple criteria. It awards points for including a checklist or rubric, addressing at least 3 dimensions, including a unique dimension, and applying all components. Dimensions are scored, with penalties for unreasonable ones and bonuses for more than 3 dimensions. Students also evaluate each other on a scale from 1 to 5 points based on their contribution as a leader, common member, or obstacle to the project. The maximum possible score is 150 points and the minimum is -20 points.
Bring checklist or rubric to real session (25 point) At least 3 dimensions are needed in checklist or rubric (10 point) At least 1 different dimension is needed in checklist or rubric when compared with proposed one. (10 point) Apply every component in checklist or rubric (5 point per components)
40
Each dimension is reasonable one.
(-5 point per unreasonable one) The number of dimension is more than 3. (+5 point per dimension more than 3, -10 point per dimension less than 3) Creative dimension (If majority of student agree with it, +10 point per dimension) Each student has 5 point to each other. Based on work on group project, evaluate each other, then sum will be a score. -Criteria 5 point: leader of group project. Creative, positive, active person 3 point: common person. Do everything he have to do, but not that evidently. 1 point: Obstacle of group project. If this person doesnt exist, group project would progress better.