De La Salle University Dasmarias City

C olle ge of En ginee ri ng, Ar chi te ct ur e & Te ch nology

A R C H I T E C T U R E D E P A R T M E N T

C O N S U LTAT I O N

F O R M

Proponents Name:
Project Title:
Date/Time/Place:
A R E A S O F C O N C E R N
COMPLIANCE
1. Are documents organized, neat, readable & comprehensible?
2. Are consultation hours maximized and observed properly? Is there no need
for surprise consultations?
3. Were letters prepared correctly and signed orderly?
4. Are references promptly cited?
5. Is formatting compliant with the CEAT RESEARCH POLICY?
CORRECTNESS
1. Is writing comprehensible because of correct grammar and usage? Is overall
intent clearly discernible and expressly made clear when one reads the prose?
2. Were major points or arguments supported by data?
3. Are citations made (or data) reliable, up-to-date and infallible?
4. Is minor editing of the work enough?
5. Are all required fields made to complement each other?
COMPLETENESS
1. Are all required chapters and subchapters completely filled in?
2. Is the writing complemented by pictures, charts and tables?
3. Does Proponent keep track of his progress?
OTHER POINTS WORTH MENTIONING

1st visit
2nd
3rd

Advisers remarks

De La Salle University Dasmarias City

C olle ge of En ginee ri ng, Ar chi te ct ur e & Te ch nology
A R C H I T E C T U R E D E P A R T M E N T

(Printed Name under Signature/Date)

THESIS ADVISER