Professional Documents
Culture Documents
God-Pro Debate
God-Pro Debate
the Probability of a
God
Jamie McCoy, Isabella Mun-Yuen
Mori, Chanel Ison
Argument
If a hypothesis doesnt have
sufficient evidence to support it, then the
probability of it being true is reduced.
Premise 1:
The Bible/Torah/Quran
We can refute many claims of the holy texts.
Theory: The universe is roughly 6,000 years old.
Evidence: (opposing) We have observed many galaxies more than
6,000 light years away fromTriangulum
earth.Galaxy=2.723 million light
years
Messier 82=11.42 million light years
P(T)= .5
P(E|T)= .05
P(E|-T)= .95
P(-T)= .50
P(T|E)= .
05
Personal Experience
Not replicable.
Not testable.
-Pareidoliaperceiving vague stimuli as
Not
reliable.
something its not.
Comfort
Appeal to Ignorance: believing in
something because you cant
conclusively prove it to be false.
Appeal to Fear: believing in something
because you are threatened if you do
not.
Criteria of Adequacy
TESTABILITY: The ability to test for Gods existence can neither be
proved nor disproved.
FRUITFULNESS: The pro-side is better abled to make predictions
based upon empirical evidence.
SCOPE: All things equal, the pro-side can better explain and account
for the diversity of phenomenon.
Criteria of Adequacy
SIMPLICITY: The con-side makes a single assumption, that God is
real, which forms a multitude of assumptions about the nature of
the world.
CONSERVATISM: The pro team can support notions that fit best
with society's established beliefs.
SOURCES
"A Templeton Conversation: Does Science Make Belief in God Obsolete?" A Templeton
Conversation: Does Science Make Belief in God Obsolete?N.p., n.d. Web. 24 May 2016.
Schick, Theodore, and Lewis Vaughn. How to Think about Weird Things: Critical Thinking
for a New Age. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Pub., 1995. 49-191. Print.