The document discusses a misleading graph that attempts to show McDonald's dominance over other franchises without including a y-axis with a 0 value. This makes the differences in sales appear larger than they are. The document then provides an alternative graph with the correct sales figures for various franchises and a y-axis starting at 0 to accurately portray the information.
The document discusses a misleading graph that attempts to show McDonald's dominance over other franchises without including a y-axis with a 0 value. This makes the differences in sales appear larger than they are. The document then provides an alternative graph with the correct sales figures for various franchises and a y-axis starting at 0 to accurately portray the information.
The document discusses a misleading graph that attempts to show McDonald's dominance over other franchises without including a y-axis with a 0 value. This makes the differences in sales appear larger than they are. The document then provides an alternative graph with the correct sales figures for various franchises and a y-axis starting at 0 to accurately portray the information.
The graph is intended to show the dominance of McDonald's over
other franchises. The graph does not have a 0. If it had a 0, it would not be a misleading graph. And its not in order. No one can understand what chart is telling, it doesnt make sense. -Starbucks $4.1 billion sales -Taco bell $4.3 billion in sales -Pizza hut $8 billion in sales -KFC $8.2 billion in sales - WENDYS $9.4billion in sales -BURGER KING $11.3 billion in sales -Macdonald $41billion in sales
45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
That chart was right two it just was not showing the view correctly and did not had a zero. This graph is exactly perfect.