To Judges & Magistrates In Court, Ask The Right Questions So As

To Reveal The Fraud - ALWAYS HAVE 10 to 20 WITNESSES IN

COURT
Sun, 12/06/2009 - 20:24 Arthur Cristian
This may help.
Ask the right questions so as to reveal the fraud.
ALWAYS HAVE 10 OR 20 WITNESSES IN COURT.
Is up to US TO STOP & REVERSE THE FRAUDULENT ACTIVITIES IN THE COURTS.
One needs to know where the goal posts are.
Regards
Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------YOU: 1. Is this a court of RECORD - (it must be or do NOT PROCEED coz you want everything
recorded).
BY THE WAY I CLAIM PRIVILEGE AND IMMUNITY HERE TODAY
THANK YOU!
JUDGE: YOU CANT DO THAT!
YOU: 2. I JUST DID, DIDNT I?
YOU: 3. WHERE ARE THE OTHER JUDGE/S?
(Constitution says there must be at LEAST 2 JUDGES or a decision could be biased)
SINCE WE CANNOT PROCEED WITH ONE JUDGE, I WILL BE THE OTHER JUDGE IN THIS
MATTER, AS MY PAPERWORK IS THE COURT, SO IF WE PROCEED, THAT IS HOW WE SHALL
PROCEED.
(If Magistrate says, no way will we proceed on that basis).
YOU: Fine, may I have the court order please showing the matter as closed and the plaintiff as having
vacated?
YOU: 4. AM I ENTITLED TO A FAIR TRIAL HERE TODAY?
(YOU are not but judge wont tell you that. It is only a dog & pony show)
JUDGE: Yes
YOU: 5. CAN I GET A FAIR TRIAL IF THERE IS A CONFLICT OF INTEREST
JUDGE: NO, WHAT DO YOU MEAN?

YOU: 6. WHO DO YOU REPRESENT HERE TODAY, WHO ARE YOU ACTING ON BEHALF OF &
WHO PAYS YOU?
YOU 7. HOW CAN YOU BE IMPARTIAL WHEN YOU WORK FOR THE SAME PARTY AS THE
PLAINTIFF?
(Judge must answer the question if any defending party believe it relevant to their case or is relevant
or is consideration for disqualifying him/her due to conflict of interest. Judge represents the state
which is the pretend plaintiff in a traffic matter.
Judge rarely answers that question. They have been known to dismiss a matter or they may say:)
JUDGE: THAT HAS NO RELEVANCE HERE TODAY.
YOU: 8 SIR, WITH ALL DUE RESPECT, ARE YOU CONFESSING THAT THE CONFLICT OF
INTEREST SHOWN BY YOU AND THE PLAINTIFF HAVING THE SAME BOSS IN THIS MATTER
HAS NO RELEVANCE HERE TODAY?
IF YOU ARE PAID BY THE SAME PARTY THAT IS PROSECUTING ME, HOW IS THAT A FAIR
TRIAL?
BY YOUR OWN ADMISSION YOU STATED FOR THE RECORD THAT WHERE THERE IS A
CONFLICT OF INTEREST THERE CAN BE NO FAIR TRIAL.
THEREFORE I MOVE THE COURT IMMEDIATELY ORDER THE PROSECUTOR TO VACATE THIS
MATTER, THANK YOU, OTHERWISE I WILL BE THE ONLY DAMAGED PARTY & MUST PURSUE
INJURIES AGAINST ALL PARTIES IN THIS MATTER.
YOU: 9. OK SIR, I REQUIRE A RULING, FOR THE RECORD, ON MY STANDING IN THIS COURT
TODAY, AS I SEE MYSELF AS A LIVING SOUL AND NOT AS A CORPORATE FICTION. FOR THE
RECORD, DO YOU SEE ME AS A LEGAL ENTITY OR AS A FREE MAN AND LIVING SOUL?
JUDGE: AS A MAN.
OTHER USEFUL QUESTIONS
YOU: 10. WHERE ARE MY PEERS THAT MAKE UP THE JURY?
JUDGE: THERE IS NO JURY IN THIS COURT.
YOU: 11. OH, IS THAT YOUR CONFESSION AS TO DENYING MY RESERVED RIGHT TO BE
TRIED BY MY PEERS?
JUDGE: OOOOH NO, I DIDNT SAY THAT.
YOU: 12. GREAT SO ILL ORGANISE A GROUP OF MY PEERS AS JURORS. WHEN SHALL WE
RECONVENE THIS HEARING FOR? (HAHAHAHAH!)
JUDGE: DISMISSED!
YOU: 13. DOES THIS COURT PERMIT PEOPLE TO LIE FOR EXAMPLE, BY FALSE
TESTIMONY,ON THE RECORD IN THIS COURT?
JUDGE NO, NOT AT ALL.

YOU: 14. GREAT, SO ANYONE CAUGHT LYING, BY KNOWINGLY MAKING FALSE OR

MISLEADING STATEMENTS OR KNOWINGLY OMITTING CRITICAL INFORMATION AND
EVIDENCE BEFORE THIS HONOURABLE COURT, YOU WILL PURSUE FOR PERJURY AND
CONTEMPT OF COURT, IS THAT CORRECT SIR, AND YOU WILL JAIL THE PERPETRATOR?
JUDGE: WELL ERRRR!
YOU: 15. YES OR NO SIR. WE CANNOT ACCEPT ANY FRAUDS HERE TODAY CAN WE OR
DOES THIS COURT CONDONE DECEIT, DECEPTION, RACKETEERING, RAPE AND PLUNDER?
JUDGE: OOOH NO, THIS COURT WILL NOT TOLERATE THAT. THATS ALL A BUNCH OF
RUBBISH!
YOU: 16. REALLY, IS THAT YOUR PERSONAL OR LEGAL OPINION SIR, AS WE ARE ONLY
INTERESTED IN THE LEGAL ONE ARE WE NOT?
JUDGE: (SILENCE)
YOU: I TAKE YOUR SILENCE AS YOUR ADMISSION THAT YOU ISSUED YOUR PERSONAL
OPINION AND THEREFORE IT DOESNT COUNT. JUST TO ENSURE THE INTEGRITY OF THIS
HEARING, COULD YOU PLEASE SIGN AN AFFIDAVIT STATING THAT WHAT THE QUESTIONS I
HAVE ASKED IS PURELY RUBBISH BECAUSE IF YOU REFUSE, I WILL ACCEPT IT AS YOUR
ADMISSION TOO, THAT WHAT I ASKED ARE PERFECTLY LEGITIMATE QUESTIONS FOR WHICH
I AM PERFECTLY ENTITLED TO ASK AND RECEIVE ANSWERS FOR AND I RESERVE THE
RIGHT TO ASK ANY QUESTIONS THAT CLARIFY THIS MATTER.
JUDGE: IM NOT GOING TO ANSWER ANY MORE QUESTIONS.
YOU: OH, SIR, THIS COURT DOES NOT WISH THAT YOU BREACH YOUR OWN
COMMONWEALTH PUBLIC SERVICE ACT 1999 SECTION 13, THE APS CODE OF CONDUCT
SUBSECTION 4, 9 & 10, WHICH EVIDENCES THAT A PUBLIC SERVANT HAS A DUTY TO
ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS RELEVANT TO THE OUTCOME OF A MATTER AND MUST COMPLY
WITH ALL APPLICABLE AUSTRALIAN LAWS, INCLUDING ALL ACTS, LAWS OF ALL STATES AND
TERRITORIES.
SO I INSTRUCT YOU TO ANSWER MY QUESTIONS PROMPTLY OR YOUR REFUSAL WILL BE
REGARDED AS CONTEMPT OF THIS COURT AND OF THE A.P.S. ACT 1999 AND OTHER ACTS
AS WELL AS YOUR INTENT TO DAMAGE ME. EITHER PROVIDE THE INFORMATION I SEEK OR
ORDER THE PLAINTIFF VACATE THIS MATTER IMMEDIATELY.
(IF HE REFUSES & RAISES CONTROVERSIES)
YOU: 17. SIR, WHY ARE YOU IGNORING MY QUESTIONS? WHAT ARE YOU HIDING SIR? I
REQUIRE EITHER AN ANSWER FROM YOU OR YOU ORDER THE PLAINTIFF VACATE THIS
MATTER IMMEDIATELY. WHICH IS IT?
JUDGE: NO, WERE NOT ENTERTAINING THAT TODAY?
YOU: 18. I SEE, SO WHY ARE YOU RAISING A CONTROVERSY AND DAMAGING ME? ARE YOU
A CONSPIRATOR TO THIS ACTION OR ARE YOU GOING TO DISMISS THIS ACTION/CLAIM?
JUDGE: IM HOLDING YOU IN CONTEMPT!
YOU: 19. WHY ARE YOU THREATENING ME SIR. NOW YOU HAVE ALSO DAMAGED ME. TELL
ME WHAT I HAVE DONE WRONG AND WHAT LAW EVIDENCES I CANNOT ASK QUESTIONS TO
CLARIFY THIS MATTER?

JUDGE: (WHATEVER)
YOU: 20. BY YOUR SILENCE OR NON REPLY, I TAKE IT AS YOUR ADMISSION THAT I DID
NOTHING WRONG AND BROKE NO LAW BY RESERVING MY RIGHT TO ASK QUESTIONS AND
THAT I MAY CONTINUE TO DO SO UNDER PRIVILEGE.
SO AM I NOT PERMITTED TO MEET MY ACCUSER?
JUDGE: YES YOU ARE, THE PROSECUTOR WILL LAY OUT THE CHARGES
YOU: 21. SIR, DOES THIS COURT ACCEPT HERE-SAY AS EVIDENCE IN THE MATTER?
JUDGE: NO.
YOU: 22. FINE. SIT DOWN MR PROSECUTOR, I BELIEVE YOU HAVE NO FIRST HAND
KNOWLEDGE BUT I WILL ALLOW YOU TO TESTIFY IF YOU SIGN AN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING TO
FIRST HAND PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE. AND BY THE WAY, WHAT DID YOU SAY YOUR NAME
WAS?
(PROSECUTOR IS GONE!)
SIR, FOR THE RECORD, WHAT IS YOUR NAME?
JUDGE: IM NOT REQUIRED TO PROVIDE THAT (OR WHATEVER)
YOU: 23. THATS CORRECT, AND THEREFORE NOR AM I, ISNT THAT CORRECT OR ARE WE
NOT EQUAL BEFORE AND UNDER THE LAW?
I THOUGHT SO, NOW SIR, AS I DONT KNOW THE NAME YOU GO BY, I WILL CROSS EXAMINE
THE COMPLAINANT. COULD YOU ORDER THEM TO THE WITNESS BOX SO I CAN BEGIN?
JUDGE: MATTER DISMISSED!
(OR)
YES, SENIOR CONSTABLE NAME ENTER THE WITNESS BOX.
YOU: 24. OH, ARE YOU PRESSING THE MATTER TODAY? ARE YOU THE PLAINTIFF BECAUSE
IF YOU ARE NOT, WE DONT WANT YOU COMMITTING PERJURY TODAY DO WE, BY
PRETENDING TO BE AND IMITATING THE PLAINTIFF, DO WE?
SIR, I CALL STATE OF QUEENSLAND TO THE WITNESS BOX. IT HAS 10 SECONDS TO APPEAR
WITH A CLAIM/COMPLAINT AGAINST ME OR I WILL MOVE THE COURT FOR AN ORDER TO
VACATE THE MATTER FOR NON APPEARANCE AND FOR NO COMPLAINT AGAINST ME HERE
TODAY.
ONE, TWO, THREE ETC
SIR, THERE IS NO COMPLAINT AGAINST ME TODAY.
I MOVE THE COURT TO ISSUE ME ORDERS IN FAVOUR OF THE DEFENDANT INCLUDING AN
AWARD FOR DAMAGES IN FAVOUR OF THE DEFENDANT,
THANK YOU.

YOU: 25. DO YOU BELIEVE YOU HAVE AUTHORITY OVER ME, YES OR NO? (cannot have
authority over the living soul, but does have authority over MR SMITH, So simply say) I AM THE
EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF THE NAME YOU CALLED OUT, I AM NOT THE PERSON OR
NAME
THATS IT. JOB DONE
YOU HAVE REVEALED THEIR SCAM. IF THEY CONTINUE, JUST LEAVE THE COURT & PURSUE
DAMAGES
YOU HAVE REVEALED THEIR SCAM. As the ONLY DAMAGED PARTY IN THE COURT, YOU
MUST INSTRUCT THE JUDGE TO AWARD YOU DAMAGES AND TO ORDER THE PLAINTIFF PAY
YOU IN GOLD OR ISSUE YOU A CHEQUE IN THE NAME OF THE ESTATE (MR WILSON)
It's over, red rover!
Now SPECIFICALLY in relation to the credit card issues, YOU need to ask the following Q's.
1. Sir, am I not permitted to see all proofs of claim? (YES)
2. Doesn't the Plaintiff & their representative bear the burden of proof? (YES)
3. Great, may I please see the complete BOOKS OF ACCOUNT for the alleged loan, I mean the ones
showing the assets AND THE LIABILITIES
4. Also, could you please order the Plaintiff to provide me the original note SO WE CAN SEE WHO
THE REAL CREDITOR IS? (What do you mean?)
I mean, the original application Sir, we don't want any hearsay in this court do we and we don't want
anyone pulling a swifty or committing a fraud do we? We need to protect everyone here don't we Sir.
Now the Judge, when he sees your intent is not to harm, may even order the matter vacated.
Who knows,
regards
Marko