1. The document discusses an ODA coaching model that takes a systems perspective when coaching clients. It views organizations as complex adaptive systems made up of interconnected parts. Coaching considers how the client's system influences them and how the system responds to change.
2. The model examines coaching issues through three lenses: content, which is the current challenges; process, which are the methods and movements toward solutions; and context, which is the internal and external perspectives that shape behaviors.
3. It references an integral model and three levels of learning as additional aspects of the coaching approach, but does not provide details on these parts of the model.
1. The document discusses an ODA coaching model that takes a systems perspective when coaching clients. It views organizations as complex adaptive systems made up of interconnected parts. Coaching considers how the client's system influences them and how the system responds to change.
2. The model examines coaching issues through three lenses: content, which is the current challenges; process, which are the methods and movements toward solutions; and context, which is the internal and external perspectives that shape behaviors.
3. It references an integral model and three levels of learning as additional aspects of the coaching approach, but does not provide details on these parts of the model.
1. The document discusses an ODA coaching model that takes a systems perspective when coaching clients. It views organizations as complex adaptive systems made up of interconnected parts. Coaching considers how the client's system influences them and how the system responds to change.
2. The model examines coaching issues through three lenses: content, which is the current challenges; process, which are the methods and movements toward solutions; and context, which is the internal and external perspectives that shape behaviors.
3. It references an integral model and three levels of learning as additional aspects of the coaching approach, but does not provide details on these parts of the model.
1. Systems perspective: A system can be defined a s a set of unites with
relationships among them. This can relate to coaching as follows: When coaching for performance the coach can assess the stability and effectiveness of the current client system and can explore the influence of the system on his client. Coach could also increase the awareness of the client in seeing systemic patterns and underlying theams. The coach can look at how the system adjusts to change and what can be done to facilitate change and transformation. We look at Organisations are open systems. A system, as opposed to a collection, is a group of interacting or interdependent elements that form a complex whole that unfolds over time. A defining feature of all true systems is that they form entities that are greater than the sum of their parts. Complex adaptive systems are so named because the parts that make them up are whole systems in their own right . These whole systems interact according to their own rules and goals, adapting to each other, and it is this interaction that brings about order of the larger system. The human body is a good example. It is made up of organ systems that in turn are made up of cells, which are made up of smaller systems. Each goes about its business, being influenced by and influencing the systems around it. If the environment changes or some challenge occurs, or if any of the subsystems sustain damage, others adapt so as to continue to achieve their goals and maintain the overall functioning of the system. A fundamental understanding common to all systemic approaches is that the systems are holistic. To understand the system one must attempt to step back from the level of the particular, and examine the systems in terms of what is created when the parts interact. One cannot view, for example, the human person as a mere collection of functioning organ systems without losing the essence of what it means to be a unique person. We are more than the sum of our parts. Open & Closed Systems Open systems are systems, which exchange matter or information with the environment. Close systems, on the other hand, have clear boundaries prohibiting the exchange of energy or information and are isolated from their environment. In closed systems, the final state is the result of the initial situation. Any alteration in the original conditions or process will affect of outcome. This is not so in open systems. So as opposed to strictly a direct cause and effect or if/then relationship there are many variables, which cannot be foreseen. This can be a challenge in a coaching relationship, where both parties must remain flexible and adaptive, and options must not be limited to either/or thinking. Thus, people, corporations, organizations, groups, families, and interpersonal relationships are all open, living systems and that is why coaching cannot be done in isolation as a linear cause and effect activity.
Coaching from a complex adaptive systems perspective does not draw a
dichotomy between the individual and the team. Rather, working with an individual is working with the team/wider organization. Similarly, one cannot work with a team without having an impact at the level of the individual. Nevertheless, it is important for the coach to be aware of, and intentional about, which level of the system is being engaged (individual, team, or organization) at any given time in the coaching process, and to consider, as best one can, the foreseeable impacts on the other levels of the system. .
2. Content, Process and Context
We start our work with individuals and organisations by looking the challenges and opportunities they face at the moment. This content is used as a spring board. What we do with the clients also refer to the content. Changing a specific behaviour, being more assertive, taking feedbacks seriously etc. Process: This means the method of doing something and also meaning moving forward. We look at the orgnisational processes that are influencing the client and the processes he follows or adapt in dealing with current situation. Solving a content issue will need ontological(theories of being) and epistemological(theories of knowledge)assumptions. So we also establish processes to examine this assumptions. Initial data collection, 360 Degree appraisals, talking to various take holders all will come under these processes. Context Context is our map of the internal and external world. It generates our individual and collective world views and includes the aggregate of all beliefs, assumptions and capabilities for action that make up this worldview. Context is the perspective from which we act and contains current assumptions and future intentions. We help clients to understand the context that shapes their behaviours and change the contexts that could help them outgrow the problem. Here is an interesting example to demonstrate, Content, Process and Context. Joshua Bell, a 39 year-old master violinist dressed in jeans and a baseball cap, placed himself against a wall at the LEnfant Plaza Metro station in Washington D.C. and began playing his violin. During the 43 minutes that he played his violin, researchers watched 1,097 people pass by during the morning rush hour. It took 3 minutes before someone even gazed in his direction, and even longer before any money was thrown into his violin case. Most people did not notice the musician. Masterful pieces such as Bachs Chaconne, Franz Schuberts Ave Maria, and Manuel Ponces Estrellita, were passed off as nothing more than generic classical music. That day,
Joshua Bell made $32.17, or 75 cents a minute. When present in an upscale
concert hall dressed in black, the same 39 year-old fiddler, on the same $3.5 million Stradivari violin, commands up to $1,000 a minute playing the exact same masterpieces. This elite musician is said to be one of the finest classical musicians in the world, playing some of the most elegant music ever written on one of the most valuable violins ever made. Within the context of a subway street musician, a measly seven people were moved to stop and listen before walking by. Within the context of a famous concert hall musician, thousands of listeners invest significant money to hear and be moved by Bells music, often with standing room only. His performance was arranged by The Washington Post as an experiment in context, perception and priorities 3. Integral Model Based on Sri Aravindos and later Ken Wilbers work we look at a holistic model while dealing with individuals and organisations.