Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 15 views

    X Dav: Mass Fraxtion Vs Average Particle Diameter

    Uploaded by

    Patrick Valdez
    This document contains data from experiments on three suspensions measuring settling time and interface height over time. A graph shows the interface height increasing linearly with settling time for each suspension. Suspension B has the steepest slope, indicating the fastest settling rate, while Suspension C has the lowest slope.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    X Dav: Mass Fraxtion Vs Average Particle Diameter

    Uploaded by

    Patrick Valdez
    15 views8 pages
    This document contains data from experiments on three suspensions measuring settling time and interface height over time. A graph shows the interface height increasing linearly with settling time for each suspension. Suspension B has the steepest slope, indicating the fastest settling rate, while Suspension C has the lowest slope.

    Original Description:

    Chelab1

    Original Title

    Experiments 9 10

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document contains data from experiments on three suspensions measuring settling time and interface height over time. A graph shows the interface height increasing linearly with settling time for each suspension. Suspension B has the steepest slope, indicating the fastest settling rate, while Suspension C has the lowest slope.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    15 views8 pages

    X Dav: Mass Fraxtion Vs Average Particle Diameter

    Uploaded by

    Patrick Valdez
    This document contains data from experiments on three suspensions measuring settling time and interface height over time. A graph shows the interface height increasing linearly with settling time for each suspension. Suspension B has the steepest slope, indicating the fastest settling rate, while Suspension C has the lowest slope.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    of 8

    X

    Dav
    0.11765
    0.11765
    0.05882
    0.05882
    0.64706

    0.0661
    0.0315
    0.0216
    0.0148
    0.0085

    Mass fraxtion vs Average


    0.7
    0.6
    0.5
    0.4

    0.3
    0.2
    0.1
    0

    0.01

    0.02

    0.03

    Dpi

    ss fraxtion vs Average Particle Diameter

    0.02

    0.03

    0.04

    Dpi

    0.05

    0.06

    0.07

    Settling Time

    Suspension A
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    12
    13
    14
    15
    16
    17
    18
    19
    20
    21
    22
    23
    24
    25
    26
    27
    28
    29
    30
    31
    32
    33
    34
    35
    36
    37
    38
    39
    40
    41

    0.8
    2.7
    4.3
    6
    8
    10.3
    12.8
    15.3
    17.8
    20.3
    22.8
    24.9
    26.9
    28.5
    29.7
    30.4
    30.9
    31.5
    32
    32.5
    33
    33.1
    33.6
    33.9
    34.3
    34.5
    34.7
    34.9
    35.3
    35.5
    35.8
    36
    36.2
    36.4
    36.5
    36.7
    36.9
    37
    37.3
    37.4
    37.6

    Interface Height
    Suspension B
    10.16
    24.13
    38.1
    50.8
    64.262
    77.216
    88.392
    95.758
    101.6
    106.68
    111.506
    114.046
    115.824
    117.094
    118.364
    119.634
    120.142
    121.666
    122.428
    123.444
    123.952
    124.714
    125.476
    125.984
    126.746
    127.254
    127.762
    128.016
    128.778
    129.032
    129.54
    130.048
    130.302
    130.81
    131.318
    131.572
    131.826
    132.334
    132.588
    132.842
    133.096

    Suspension C
    6.985
    14.605
    18.925
    20.325
    21.209
    22.225
    22.86
    22.987
    23.998
    24.13
    24.447
    24.965
    25.082
    25.241
    25.4
    25.559
    25.877
    26.035
    26.194
    26.199
    26.352
    26.511
    26.67
    26.67
    26.829
    26.825
    26.925
    27.025
    27.125
    27.125
    27.225
    27.225
    27.325
    27.425
    27.425
    27.425
    27.525
    27.525
    27.525
    27.625
    27.625

    42
    43
    44
    45

    37.8
    42
    42.1
    42.3

    133.35
    133.604
    133.858
    134.366

    27.625
    27.725
    27.725
    27.825

    4
    9.5
    15
    20
    25.3
    30.4
    34.8
    37.7
    40
    42
    43.9
    44.9
    45.6
    46.1
    46.6
    47.1
    47.3
    47.9
    48.2
    48.6
    48.8
    49.1
    49.4
    49.6
    49.9
    50.1
    50.3
    50.4
    50.7
    50.8
    51
    51.2
    51.3
    51.5
    51.7
    51.8
    51.9
    52.1
    52.2
    52.3
    52.4

    Settling Time versus Interface Height


    160
    140
    120
    100

    80
    60
    40
    20
    0

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    45

    50

    52.5
    52.6
    52.7
    52.9

    versus Interface Height

    25

    Suspension A
    Suspension B
    Suspension C

    30

    35

    40

    45

    50

    You might also like