Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Stonequist - The Problem of The Marginal Man
Stonequist - The Problem of The Marginal Man
The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to
American Journal of Sociology.
http://www.jstor.org
THE AMERICAN
JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY
VOLUMEXLI
JULY 1935
NUMBER I
OF SOCIOLOGY
THE AMERICANJOURNAL
to theoretical
and practicalstudentsofhumanbehavior.Livingas
theirpersonalities
and careers
theydo, in betweenthetwocultures,
in
and linkedwithbothsystems.Theythusmirror
are interwoven
of
and
the
two
especially
theirownpersonalities
aspects
cultures,
therelationsofthetwocultures.
this
RobertE. Park2foridentifying
We areindebtedto Professor
personality
type,whichhe has calledthe "marginalman" and dein the cultural
finedas one who is "livingand sharingintimately
lifeand traditionsof two distinctpeoples,neverquite willingto
break,even if he werepermittedto do so, withhis past and his
traditions,
and not quite accepted,becauseof racialprejudice,in
thenewsocietyin whichhe nowseeksto finda place."3 Accepting
we may inthis broad statement,
withonlyminorqualifications,
intothenatureofthismarginalman,thevariations
in
quirefurther
and hislife-cycle.
type,thesocialsituationoutofwhichhe emerges,
Let us beginwiththe socialsituation,sinceit is thiswhichproWe have alreadyindicated
ducesthemarginaltypeofpersonality.
situation
a bi-cultural
(or multi-cultural)
its generalconfiguration:
in whichmembers
ofone culturalgroupareseekingto adjustthemselves to the groupwhichpossessesgreaterprestigeand power.
onewherethe
Two generaltypesofsituationmaybe distinguished:
culturaldifference
the
also includesa racial (biological)difference;
is purelycultural.Each ofthesecan be
secondwherethedifference
further
subdivided.
The firstof these marginalsituations,that involvinga racial
oftheproblem
difference,
affords
at firstglancea clearerconception
thandoesthesecond.Thisis particularly
trueas regardspersonsof
raciallymixedancestry.The individualof mixedbloodis likelyto
growup influenced
by the culturesof each of his parentalgroups.
of one culture,he is often
Even if his familylifeis predominantly
withtheothercultureor group.In
keenlyawareofhis connection
additionhe is apt to possesssomeofthephysicaltraitsofeachofthe
identify
tworaces. Othermembers
ofthecommunity
can therefore
himas ofmixeddescent.Consequently,
whateverracialprejudicesolicitudeto bitingconrangingfrommildaloofnessor Datronizing
"Migrationand the Marginal Man," AmericanJournalofSociology,May,
3Ibid., p. 892.
1928.
THE AMERICANJOURNAL
OF SOCIOLOGY
becategoricattitudeofthewhiteracewhichmakesno distinction
assumeda
tweenpureNegroesand mixedpersons,he has gradually
shareoftheleadershipofthedarkerrace.4
morethanproportionate
occupiesa different
In otherpartsof the worldthe mixed-blood
position.In India,forexample,theEurasiancannotentereitherof
of
Each of the twomainracesis contemptuous
theparent-groups.
mixedindividuals.The Eurasianclingsto thecoat ofthealoofbut
despisestheIndian,and is heartilydespised
Englishman,
retreating
himlittleor no
in turn.The growthof Indian nationalismoffers
Eurasian
future;it increaseshis social isolation.As an intelligent
amongourselveswe
has stated,"To theEuropeanwe arehalf-caste,
are no caste,and to the Indianwe are outcaste."5
and conflict
oftheracesis lesssevere,the
Wherethecompetition
mixedgroupmay have a positioncloserto the dominantrace. In
or
certaincolonialareaswherewhitemencometo live temporarily,
else live as a capitalistic-nota working-class,the mixed-blood
a middleclass in status.The whitegroupis
groupapproximates
and it mayfinda
it occupiestheleadingpositions,
smallin number,
usefulbothfroman economicstandmiddleclass of mixed-bloods
pointand becauseit acts as a "buffer"groupseparatingthe two
ratherthanconunmixed
races. In thiscase,whereaccommodation,
of
developsthetraits theconformist
flict,prevails,themixed-blood
anxiousto preservehis superiorstatus.In Java,forexample,the
civil
has beendescribedas "usuallytemperate,
averagemixed-blood
devotedto
hospitable,and essentially
to the pointof sycophancy,
Again,the cool attitudeof Jamaicanmulattoesor
his family."6
movement
"colored"peopleto MarcusGarvey's"Back-to-Africa"
oftheirpreference
forthestatusquo.7
indication
was an illuminating
situationshouldbe noted: thatwhere
Another
typeofmixed-race
See E. B. Reuter,The Mulattoin theUnitedStates (Boston, I9I8).
Quotedin Mary H. Lee, "The Eurasian: A Social Problem"(thesisin theUniversity
of Chicago Library),p. io.
6 H. J. Scheuer,quoted in S. H. Roberts,PopulationProblems
ofthePacific(London,
4
I927),
p. 378.
In his Philosophyand Opinionsof Marcus Garveyor Africafor theAfricans,compiled by AmyJacques-Garvey,Vol. II (New York, I926), Garveywrites: "I was openly
hated and persecutedby some of these coloredmen of the island who did not want to
be classifiedas Negroes,but as white. They hated me worsethan poison" (p. I27).
7
racialintermarriage
existsupon an extensivescale. Latin America
generallyand Hawaii are illustrations.
Such a situationdoes not
implythecompleteabsenceofraceprejudice,as somewriters
have
affirmed;
butit doeschangethecharacter
ofraceprejudice,
preventingor restricting
its institutionalization
and drivingit undercover,
whereit leads a precariousbut not insignificant
life. Here the
racialhybriddevelopsa somewhatmorediversified
character,rethe greaterfreedomof his position,and so approximates
flecting
morenearlyto the statusofthedominantrace.
variedas thesemixed-blood
situationsare,theyall
Significantly
and racialprejudice;and theyhavean
involvesomeculturalconflict
unsettled,
problematic
character.Thereis a pull and pressurefrom
bothsides. The personof mixedblood,by his dual biologicaland
culturalorigin,is identified
witheach group.His awarenessof the
thatin lookingat himself
conflict
situation,mildor acute,signifies
fromthe standpoint
of each grouphe experiences
the conflict
as a
runcounterto his feelings
of
personalproblem.Thus his ambitions
self-respect:
he wouldprefer
recognition
by thedominant
race,but
he resents
tooneraceis counteritsarrogance.A senseofsuperiority
to theotherrace. Prideand shame,
balancedbya senseofinferiority
love and hate,and othercontradictory
sentiments,
mingleuneasily
in hisnature.The twoculturesproducea dualpatternofidentificationand a dividedloyalty,and theattemptto maintainself-respect
transforms
these feelingsinto an ambivalentattitude.The individualmaypass in and out of each groupsituationseveraltimesa
is repeatedly
focuseduponeach groupattiday; thushis attention
or
tudeand hisrelationship
to it. A processofrepeatedstimulation
meaningful
conditioning
goes on whichbecomesof centralsignifiHis racialstatusis continually
called
cancein hislife-organization.
in question;naturallyhis attentionis turnedupon himselfto an
excessivedegree: thus increasedsensitiveness,
self-consciousness,
an indefinable
and variand race-consciousness,
malaise,inferiority
are commontraitsin the marginal
ous compensatory
mechanisms,
person.The giftedmulatto,Dr. Du Bois,8has analyzedtheproblem
in termsofa "doubleconsciousness":
"..... the Negrois a sortof seventhson, bornwitha veil, and giftedwith
second-sightin this Americanworld-a worldwhichyieldshim no true self8W. E. B. Du Bois, TheSoulsofBlackFolk(Chicago, I903), p. 3.
The Jewis likelyto be a typical marginalman. Perhaps the factors in his situation are the most complex. His is the traditional
minoritygroup. He is the perennialimmigrant.His childrenare apt
to have the second-generationproblems. Popularly regarded as a
race, the Jews are felt to be unassimilable. (Consider the Nazi
ideology.) An individualof part-Jewishancestrymay be thoughtof
in termssimilarto the mixed-blood.Besides being a distinctivereligious group, they are viewed by many Christians as "Christkillers." Centuriesof social conflict,combinedwith theirtenacious
historicalmemories,have produced a group consciousnesswhich in
turnsuspects and resistsassimilationtendencieswhichgo beyond a
certain point. It is little wonder,then, that the Jew becomes the
classicillustrationofthisproblem,just as he has been mostarticulate
in expressingit.
The marginal type may emerge among a people who have not
themselves emigrated but instead have been subject to invasion
fromwithout. The expansionof Westernpeoples duringthe modern
periodof historyhas been the main factorin creatingthis situation.
Besides the racial hybrid,thereis also the unmixedculturalhybrid.
Missionarieshave been instrumentalin producingsuch individuals:
the convertwho is no longeradjusted to his native group and yet is
not fullyat home or accepted by the whitegroup. Colonial administratorshave noted the difficulties
connectedwith Westernizednatives-"Europeanized Africans," for instance. Incidentally, it is
that such termsare applied to Westernizedindividualsof
significant
both mixed and unmixeddescent: apparentlythe fact of race mixture is not the crucial one. Modern nationalisticmovementscan be
understoodbest in termsof a reactionto such culturalhybridization.
This is recognizedby some of the leading studentsof India, forexample. It may be pertinentto note what the East India Calcutta
UniversityCommissionhad to say concerningthe effectsof English
education upon the studentsof Bengal:
The Bengalistudent,likemanya studentin otherlands,feelsuponhis mind
the pull of two loyalties,the loyaltyto the old orderand loyaltyto the new.
ofcombining
thesetwoloyaltiesis verygreat. Each
But inhis case thedifficulty
to him. He findsit hardto lightupon
loyaltyneedsfullerand clearerdefinition
it is oftenhis fateto lead what
any real adjustmentbetweenthem. Therefore,
Io
is in effect
a doubleintellectual
life.He is two-minded
andlivesa parallellife
in theatmosphere
oftwocultures.9
Naturally the marginalindividual is not identical in all his personalitytraitsin all situations,nor even withinone situation. What
is heretermed"marginal" representsa processof abstraction,a core
of psychologicaltraits which are the inner correlatesof the dual
pattern of social conflictand identification.The intensityof the
innerconflictvaries with the situationitself,the individual experience with this situation,and perhaps certaininheritedtraits. With
some individuals,it appears to be a minorproblem;in such cases one
cannot speak of a "personalitytype." It is onlyin those cases where
the conflictis intenseand of considerabledurationthat the personality as a whole is orientedaround the conflict.The individualthen
seems almost to be "obsessed" with his problem; his moods are reshaped. Then, in spiteof the variationsin race and culture,the type
is clearlydelineated.
Anotherimportantdistinctionshould be emphasized: the existence of a life-cycle.The traits of the individual vary considerably
with the stage of development.Three stages can be defined: First,
there is a stage of preparationwhen the individual is being introduced into the two cultures. In a generalway thisrepresentsat least
some assimilationinto the two cultures. Without at least partial
assimilationthe individualwould not later experiencethe conflictof
loyalties. This assimilationis often an unwittingprocess in which
the individual does not realize he is taking over two cultures. At
this periodhe is not consciousof a personalityproblem;usually this
stage is confinedto childhood.
The second stage has the characterof a "crisis": the individual,
throughone or moredefiningexperiences,becomes aware of the cultural conflictwhichinvolveshis own career. I'his may be the result
of a singleexperiencewhich climaxesa process of summation,or it
may dawn in a more gradual and imperceptiblemannernot clearly
recallable by the subject. The typical traits of the marginal man
arise out of the crisis experienceand in response to the situation.
is seriouslydisturbed. Confusion,
The individual'slife-organization
and estrangementmay reeven shock,restlessness,disillusionment,
sult; a new self-consciousness
develops to mirrorthe newlyrealized
9 Reportof theEast
India CalcuttaUniversity
Commission(Calcutta, I9I9),
p.
128.
II
I2
doesnotappearto be resolvedexceptfortemporary
sometheconflict
periods,and withothersit initiatesa processof disorganization
crime,suicide
whichfindsexpressionin statisticsof delinquency,
That thetraitsofthemarginalman,as well
and mentalinstability.
as his attitudetowardhis position,shouldvaryin thisthirdstage
at thistime.
is perhapsso obviousthatit needsno development
so thereis a natural
fortheindividual,
Justas thereis a life-cycle
forthesituation.The initialphaseinvolvesa smallgroupof
history
or submarginalindividualswho are muchahead of the minority
and
ordinategroup.This favorsthe processof theiridentification
assimilationwith the dominantrace; it is about the only road.
Graduallythegroupofmarginalpersonsincreasesand theminority
andideas. It makesprogress
raceitselfbeginstostirwithnewfeelings
and self-respect.
race
Then,ifthedominant
in culturaldevelopment
in itspositionand attitudesofsuperiority,
continuesintransigently
themsomeof the marginalindividualsswingabout and identify
definethe situationand
selveswiththe risinggroup.Theyfurther
nationalistic,
acceleratethe movement.In thismanner,nativistic,
evolvefromtricklesintotideswhichhave as
and racialmovements
The finalouttheirgoalssomekindof equalityand independence.
a newrace,nationalcomemaybe a newsocialframework-perhaps
is
ity,caste,or evena newstate. On theotherhand,ifassimilation
intothe
the minority
groupis eventuallyincorporated
facilitated,
dominantgroup,or theminority
group(say,ofmixedbloods)may
growand becomethe dominantgroup,and the particularcycle
comesto an end.
part.
In anycase,themarginal
manis likelyto havean important
in thistypeof culturalchange.Fromthe
He is thekey-personality
then,thestudyofthemarginalmanis obviouspracticalviewpoint,
the standpointof theoretical
From
science,his lifely significant.
a methodforstudyingthe culturalprocessfromthe
historyoffers
mental,as wellas objective,side. In thewordsofPark,"It is in the.
man-wherethechangesandfusions
mindofthemarginal
ofculture
can
on-that
we
best
are going
studythe processesof civilization
and progress."II
II
Op.
cit.,p. 893.