Sally kohn: Each year hundreds of thousands of animals are killed in research experiments. But this reasoning reflects a complete disregard of animal's rights, kohn says. She says legislation that will grant animals exactly the same rights as humans is desperately needed. Kohn's goal is to create a world where all living creatures have the same rights, she says.
Sally kohn: Each year hundreds of thousands of animals are killed in research experiments. But this reasoning reflects a complete disregard of animal's rights, kohn says. She says legislation that will grant animals exactly the same rights as humans is desperately needed. Kohn's goal is to create a world where all living creatures have the same rights, she says.
Sally kohn: Each year hundreds of thousands of animals are killed in research experiments. But this reasoning reflects a complete disregard of animal's rights, kohn says. She says legislation that will grant animals exactly the same rights as humans is desperately needed. Kohn's goal is to create a world where all living creatures have the same rights, she says.
Sally kohn: Each year hundreds of thousands of animals are killed in research experiments. But this reasoning reflects a complete disregard of animal's rights, kohn says. She says legislation that will grant animals exactly the same rights as humans is desperately needed. Kohn's goal is to create a world where all living creatures have the same rights, she says.
Directions: Evaluate the argument presented in the following brief essay by using a four-step critical reading strategy: Skim, Reflect, Read, and Evaluate. Write down your judgment and support it thoroughly. Each year hundreds of thousands of animals are killed in research experiments. These include not only rats and mice, but also rabbits, monkeys, dogs, cats, and birds. The deaths are considered justified because the research is necessary to save human lives. But this reasoning reflects a complete disregard of animals rights. Animals rights? The idea may seem strange if youve never heard it before. But it is not a new idea. Eighteenth- century French philosopher Voltaire reasoned that because animals have feelings and can understand, at least in a primitive way, they therefore have rights. Albert Schweitzer, the famous jungle doctor and humanitarian, believed that reverence for life applied not just to humans, but to all living creatures. Dr. Thomas Regan, professor of philosophy at North Carolina State University, argued persuasively for such rights in his book Animal Rights and Human Obligations. He believes that people resist the idea that animals have rights largely because they think of the world as belonging exclusively to humans. They see dogs and cats and even more exotic animals like dolphins and apes as objects rather than creatures, as things to be owed and used. He concludes that its not crazy to believe, as some Eastern cultures do, that animals have rights. Our aim is to break some standard patterns of though about animals that are held in Western society. A number of people have spoken out on this issue. For example, the group that organized a petition-signing drive in Ann Arbor to save the lives of six gorillas scheduled to be used (and probably maimed or killed) in a University of Michigan automobile accident research project. And the man in Honolulu who freed two dolphins from a University of Hawaii laboratory where, though they were not being harmed, they were wrongfully imprisoned. Such people may be scored and derided as fanatics today, but they will one day be regarded as heroes. Such praiseworthy actions, unfortunately, are too limited to make much of a difference. What is desperately needed is legislation that will grant animals exactly the same rights that humans enjoy, and that will prohibit the use of any animal in any research experiment that will cause it suffering, regardless of the supposed value of the research. All sensitive and caring people will support such legislation and urge their legislators to enact it without delay.