Boyaouzog feamanas -posodea yoy Ajjensn ave sureoq 30 so8uey dot an ren wondaoxe om wins adap pur wipes ‘afuey wreag 40 ‘uumjoo feurIOT 9x7 01 s9N09 9}eJ2U0D Jo saqDUT Z SUIPPE 4 9pew stanton Sayooudauy jo woneqnoqes omy “Sens “wodds ox jo wisp amy 1 patopisuoo oq prnoys 'Sopoordary Surpyany‘saqwow reson (re 7o.WataM Sa “sen yaar sqenop 30535 op poe ‘ey ano] a(Funs 405 pom oq pmoysjsd 0¢ Jo W894 umuuTuTE V “sImpaco 20 sAeN eotTO9Fe Jo WoNe30] pe yyfiau ajemondde amy somiop 0} paimnsues 9 pros doors e292 LL -suoddns adjd Supsrxe on Sarppe ways weuodun Atrersedsa si sm “odid 2 30 ayo ane Jo mp JO Woosed og ox usazed of Aensn stm sous ‘PUSTGENSS 9q Pmoys our om Jo IyBtaK Soperedo peuuON ap ‘ospy “2oETd Ut PorssoupAY 299 es unt am tou 30 spon peusaes 34 pmoys af ‘sou ae pu Lode ase 40d “enoge paquiasop se papeo| posspisuos aq pmnoys syoddas odd wo svore amury pie idm ‘osry “Sumnsmxo 10 wou “uoddns adid Sve wo Surdid 10g pasn oq Prous sd ¢7 Jo prox Superado ummururar y “ajqessyaud st Surdid Sunsrxo ayy yo axrruosoidal ‘Peo PengLNsrp AfuLiozrum y ~sAoge paquiossp se yda0x9 speo} poyerasqu0d [ENPrAYPUy ‘sv amyonns amp 0} poridde oq Smndid am very Aresso000 Jou st “Pazopysuos 9q PIOUS suoddns adid axp wo panioddns Sundid yenise un “suoddns adid dunsreo Surzspere UK smomerp ody =p proj op adig = plu, yon sod add 30 yi = Supeds uoding = poy parenua940) Rae R a (o4- asa eymunoy Suwon ayn aL sone sip or payoene soqqea 2x1 Buqsn parernoyes 9q eo peoy perentuaot0e sma “uoddns 2p uo aBtasone oon ey 9838 SoZISZ eo] Te are yory sad 1e Pappe 29 nays Peo| parenuzouo Y “pasopIsuoo 29 PMOYS peo] IY e AIqIssod Jo soto & J SUMMIOIOP 1 parsuoo 2q prmoys woneuionm sseoord pre Suidid Areuranyosa 'WORpUOO peOt umerado amp so iuaarad o9 se wane 99 eur wonEpueD peo] Aadura aq, “suoddns adid 205 ‘onrpuce peo] Sunexsdo oFesoA8 we oq 0} ParpIsuoo st Yor ‘9/9 soyoUE Sy ye paoeds: “oyea Jo Tny sodid yout g Jo peor ywayeambo ue 0 spuodsaisoo sta, “spoddns add ofr 105 pasn 9q prnogs (joo, artnbs 40g spunoa) Jsd oF JO PEO] 320p odd oBeroAE ty eto coded 96POTE 91H voEONARE OST STZ 0x9 sonDELE rempnng Tosa aordia SIWOddNs dale ‘TaINVE WOOTSuusouriog reamjanns A ‘sou amp Te StapIsUOO {yo pets pas oq fTeYS s]DNEFIND UONDE POFEIDOSSE PTE 50405 O6SHY ‘SPO 13 Sunyesar‘soun soems Sutz0N pure sou 1a8ze] Aqua Sowopyst0o 7 ‘Hoddns wana #10 _sworoy 58 saquioay ax) ssos3e PeOy PSINgENSTP 104 ‘sinokey Sundid ‘pur wrep Surs20wdu ssoryddns wosy pauTE}qo 2q PMoUs ‘Ss9peaq PUE ‘SKEALATEN ‘SISPPEL ‘Suuope(d poreroosse fe 30 swgdta SuTpnyoUT S12]009 se se yons yustudmba 10g BIO spor wonaty speoy ayenbqureg pay Pa, Spey ese] Spoor rensa) soomdmnbg, srvodans aad a = THNVINONT etsoyaiea 962011 aed HoRFONANE OSEE SIZ 049 20NTEILSapaongug amps samy paqoene ap uy poutop are suonoasp asi2AsueN ue yempmaSuory “wonsomp yeurprnyBuo| xp uF Sioquiaas s9NoTHUED Se pausiseP Ayyensn are suoddns odid pontuysup), “euajuo gof ain wo puradap tir pasn ypeadde ‘UBISep ayy, “suTeG; piss snonuNUCD e se JO “FuTIEAg PEORIA 0) SpeO] [EUTPTYTUOY Ie Surpnasuren sucmjoo an} ine Zonse soe Stns FeoTraSOT 9M Me Poussop 29 few suoddns odd ponnns ‘uonsonp prerparSuoy mp U] "Loner esreasuen arg uy ‘vag ‘Sonny pra se poudsop are ‘pautuasm so pounns‘suoddas add “res suoddns 1od301§ aed ‘a snoyffnony pasmbar se suoddns fons 10 staxouoo uumnfoo afFaIS SNOOUETTOST skewadid Axepuoons pais PoNNSU] sKowodid ureut jos pans siemadid Arepuooss 21210009 PUNT] sKewodyd ureur saiou09 panning :swomj se ‘syoddns yo sas otseq 9 are axou| soto pope Sel ayer ue 9 Su Ww suoddns (jews troy SuxBues sommjons jo ssep e soquosep ,suoddns adyd, wuz 1 “suoddns adid se wra1oy paquosap se sasuonns {[e 0} sendde soncesd sma) SINIWHOVLLY = SANTIS SINSNOUWOD LHOdaNS Hala JO NOISE SCVOINOISEG ‘TWWENED § _suopaas sofew Suysonoy amp sepnyouy sonsesd SM, suoddag ‘did jo wSsop oxp 105 sampocosd popusunooas pre seaapmd saystiquise soncesd SMT, e170 afea, 96ROTT ave HoNEININS OST STZ 019 22nTEIE NOLLVOTTdav ‘qa0os ‘qsoauna siuoaans gait ‘TaINVE NONESuproomideq reamanays -speot wowdmbo pu ‘ermyanns ‘jeinooje ‘Burdid apnyout speot AA2ID -pouyop are spooy 2s0yp Jo stoneNyqaTa ‘osty “speo} Je1oTe| pur speo} Ayaexs apniom Mofag Pessnosyp spe] WAts9P =HLL -weaufdog jempnng peo soford ‘2p ynanp pareurps00> 9q prods 1nq ‘pedemooua Spears stasn maya ‘suoddns odd _o otsop om pre sisAfews aun 20} qqerrear are srouspeauds pu suresosd somndaroc) seofoxd amp so suoneogoads Srgposdany ‘xp wt pougap are Suoosdaxy soy swwotmaumbos ay, “aNnIeOseHe YeORTOUCGD ‘ue 09 we ose ‘Butjooxdasy Jo apysino suosamu0d 10 Fuyoosdary Prey 405 Wado YT seare nopemueo YyLA s!oquioul [201 Jo Bujoordary doug “aAnwurayfe eorOUARD yom ‘xn 29 Aur oyarot09 ise2aud ‘Surgooidary axmbox ye suoddns odyd else] 105 “30820 Tewayeus poupour pte paisa Ayisea put TEORUOUON ISou oxy sf oots “Pou Ou St sumoordary 7 “spenspy ‘ssonarayaud way pa ‘Suonsyra] yuouamoord ‘syusuarmbar ‘Sugoorda1y ‘swonpuco ous Aq pousiqetse Stresonad st jeusyE wonsMAsUoS SAL ssaopemores ustsop woddns odid Suruoprod 04 soyd saowaxap.o10T posodoad pure Sunsrce pue stuomasmnbar souese2[9 0} UaAtd oq prnous woresapysueD enc “epaitio udisop zooford omy ur poysTqEIsa aye SCOWENED|O osstp ‘AITEULION, “UBtsOP eM} Try donesaprsueo Wwewodunt ww aya syoddns add pumnase pre ‘19pun ‘saKo sooUTez021) ‘@uyssaxo peor ye smaoo ATTEWOU YONI 25 Op Spooaxa simoq wodéns wo3480q Suroeds am ways posn Syreotdhs are so8piq adig 369} Sz 01 07 Sposaxe Buoeds yoddas ‘a way parlddns Suroq Sureoq aerPouL UM 129} Op OF OT WON AIBA NO Batoeds hu2q oq) ‘Toast “195 $7 01 9Z 548 SBurzeds yoddns eoydy, “pooddns Bu1eq Aen ‘sqqes feomsop pu Sind soy weds aygenorre mn wo poseg st suoddns yo Suroeds oy, speoy Ase, savoTNoIsad siwodans dard ee = TONVORONTE er jozadea 96POTT 26q vonronana OST S¥z 0L9 20NDFLUOR DANIEL. Practice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 110c196 Attachment 08 Page 7 of 11 ‘SAMPLE DESIGN 3 : CONCRETE PIPERACK DESIGN WITH SEISMIC DESIGN Design Modet 4 Determine f, due to Vy = Transfer V, @ top of socket to CL of socket : ma Mo Determine f, due to M, : eM f= BL? v ieee a ri gq Ray 4 + anaes i bt ~ ‘oe fy + f, Due to Wu Due to Mu fy = Structural EngineeringPractice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 110c196 Attachment 08 Page 8 of 11 FLUOR DANIEL ‘SAMPLE DESIGN 3 : CONCRETE PIPERACK DESIGN WITH SEISMIC DESIGN Column Reactions from STAAD Ill Analysis. Critical transverse load comb. : File : CONCPR, Joint 2, Load 14 M, @ top of socket = 253.14 f-kips W. @ top of socket = 25.49 kips Critical longitudinal load comb. :14 , Friction M, @ top of socket 0.0 ft-kips W. @ top of socket = 24.22 Kips. ‘Socket Design - Transverse Direction Determine bearing pressure distribution on socket wall. B= Col diam. + 2* grou 22.00in f= 4Vy/ BL. 102.89 psi f= -2V)/BL= -51.48 psi fou ae = 6M, / (BLY = 409.12 psi f= fy fa 512.11 psi he tyt tn = -460.61 psi 4 (ACI9.3.2.4)= 0.70 fr nor = 0.85 $f) = 1785.00 psi O.K. x= A 1 (6 fe 23.69 in R, = 05f,(B)x = 133.48 Kips ‘Check shear stress @ assumed crack section ( shear friction ) WER /2= 66.73 kips 4 = (ACI9.3.23 ) = 0.85 (socket wall thk-clr-0.5d,)= — 13.5in x+di2 = 30.44 in iy = Wy L$ Dg) = 191.03 psi Vi we = 0.2010 = 600.00 psi O.K. ‘Check wall thickness for diagonal tension cracking @ comer (Ref : ASCE Structural Journal, June 76, pp 1229- 1254) fee = 6 iG 328.63 psi be bey 30.44 in & = id= 44385 in Coy = (23M B bac = 99.04 kips 183.46 kips 22.00 20.39 f-kips ba? 12000 = 0.462 Mus = 44.10 "ACI Handbook Flexure 1.1)= 0.988 T= Mf (jp * 4) 18.34 kips. of Me, ‘on Pte oo 7; z Ra —c/ FREE BODY OF CORNER “> c, Structural Engineering,FLUOR DANIEL Practice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 110ct96 Attachment 08 Page 9 of 11 Mae = M, + (R/2)"2.8/12= 34.29 fkips IF 7417 (ACI Handbook, Flexure 1.1)= 0.983, © = Te = Mus! Cy * d= 31.01 kips def+e§ = 36.03 kips OK. Design Ties ‘SAMPLE DESIGN 3 : CONCRETE PIPERACK DESIGN WITH SEISMIC DESIGN me 1 Re “F* Ties - Design for combined bending ( Mus) + Tension at joint. TeT, +R2= 97.74 kips g= (AcI93.22)= oso AaTIOh)= 1.81 in? AIFT= AIDS O71 F/R Use #6 tles @ 6 oe A, PROVD = 0.88 int /f be = (ACI) 41.80 in &, PROVD = 44.00 in OK *E" Tes - Design for bending (M, ) and for shear friction. = (ACI93.2.2)= 0.80 ET Gh) 0.34 in? | t Meta 0.43 in / R te (rer i23) oes , Par My, = (ACI 11.743 14 F ties 0.26 in? | I il 0.14 ine A. 4 0.5(Ay,/FT + Ag/FT) = o.14 in? ft L Bt 8 ties Use #4 ties @ 6° ole a E ties A, PROVD = ou m oe “D" Ties - Design for bending at midspan & for shear friction. M, = ROUM10= 24.47 fi-kips K=M, /F= $2.92 nae 445 Ag = My/ (ay *d) = 0.41 in? uaa = 0.16 in? / BM = A= (As PROVD"ED -ASt = 0.09 int Use #4 ties @ 12” cle A, PROVD = oir OK Structural Engineering,Practice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 110ct96 Attachment 08 Page 10 of 11 FLUOR DANIEL SAMPLE DESIGN 3 : CONCRETE PIPERACK DESIGN WITH SEISMIC DESIGN Design Socket End Walls W =R/2 66.73 kips ta’ = 2" Sooket wall thickness +B = 54.00in $= (ACI83.2.3)= 0.85 d=08%% = 43.20 in : wy EW Leth d= 113.58 psi ve = 2\(fe) = 108.54 psi \ ‘Shear reinforcing is required Horizontal Shear Reinforcing Req'd +—D ties Max of (vy - Ve)/f, oF 0.0025 = 0.0025 J Max Spe = Min of (iy /5 38h, of 18°= 10.80 in Use spacing “s” 6.00 in ! Use #6 "F* tie @ 6" spacing Check here for +k node Check here for sheor tition 0.44 in? OK. Verticat Shear Reinforcing Req'd : hy= ht 16.00 in P, = Max of .0025+2-R(p, — 0025) or 0.0025 = 0.0025 Max Spo'g = Min of (.,/3), 3h or 18"= 18.00 in Use *s" = Dowel Spacing = 9.55 in T T A,REQD=P,*s"h= 0.38 in? E te. fl \ A,PROVD = (2- #8 at 9.55") O88 in? OK H H i ‘Check Wall for Flexure ‘| i i ll M, = 0.5(M, @ T.0. socket + V, @ T.O. socket * L) = 174,36 fekips ie 3 al conser ony UB ao" thege 4 dowels So Bene ees” ti, a A, = My /(ay"d) = Loe A,PROVD = (4-#6' @ *S")= ‘Check Shear Transfer @ T.O. Footing Vy= 05*V, @T.O. socket = 42.745 Kips + AGI 9.3.23) = 0.85 2. ACI11.7.4.3)= 1.00 ‘ \* qi Ag = Wi (Oth H)= 0.25 in i Use Dov ae : (eee A, PROVD= (6-#5)= 2.66 in? \ rh oe Structural EngineeringPractice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 110ct96 Attachment 08 Page 11 of 11 FLUOR DANIEL SAMPLE DESIGN 3 : CONCRETE PIPERACK DESIGN WITH SEISMIC DESIGN ‘Socket Desian - Longitudinal Direction Determine Bearing Pressure Distribution on Socket Wall B= (Col Dim.) + (2" Grout) = fy 4Vu 1 (BL) = he 28D = fu = fay = 6M, (BL?) = ov hog = fay + Sow (ACI 9.3.2.4) fe enw = 0.85% "f= ATL, -6) R, = O5*f,*x"B= Compare Transverse condition to Longitudinal condition My @ Top of Socket Vy @ Top of Socket Ry = 05°f,*x*B= XE HTL) fe * No By Comparison : Use "E" lies same as "F* ties. Check Shear Transfer @ top of Footing Vy =0.5*V, @ socket = (ACI 9.3.2.3) = ACL11.7.4.3)= Ae = MGT) = A, PROVD = (6-#6)= 22.00 in 97.86 psi 48.93 psi 0.00 psi 87.86 psi 48.93 psi 0.70 1785.00 psi 30.00 in 32.29 kips. TRANS. 253.14 25.49 133.48 23.69 512.11 42.11 kips. 0.85 1.00 0.24 in? 2.64 in? LONG, CONTROLS 0.00 f-kips TRANS. 24.22 kips TRANS. 32.29 kips TRANS. 30,00 in LONG. 97.86 psi TRANS. ‘Use same reinforcement as Transverse direction except as noted above. Leveling Plate Desian Ultimate weight of P.S. column = Impact @ 50% of weig! Py = Ultwt. + Impact = 4 = (ACI9.3.2.4)= AE square plate = f= PulAy = Ki Fe an = 0.854(06) | 52 OK Structural EngineeringFLUOR DANIEL PIPE SUPPORTS Anchor Loads Load Combinations Practice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 110ct96 Page S of 13, Piping anchors (and guides) cause expansion movement to occur at desired locations in piping system. The Pipe Stress Engineer is responsible for locating anchors and ‘providing anchor loads. For this reason, itis important thatthe Structural Engineer ‘communicate with the Pipe Stress Engineer prior to starting and during the design of any pipe suppor. Anchor loads are usually small and adjacent pipes will transfer the load laterally to the Jongitudinal beam struts. It is normally preferred to either have the anchors staggered along the pipeway so that each support has only 1 or 2 anchors, or to anchor all pipes on | braced support. Special consideration should be given to pipe supports on which all or ‘most ofthe lines are anchored, or on which significant anchor loads are anticipated. ‘Anchor loads have 2 components, thermal and friction, The friction component is related to the friction loads defined above. Engineering judgment will be exercised in ‘determining to what extent the friction and anchor loads are to be combined to design a pipe support. Since anchor loads are normally not available until the later stages ofa project, stel pipe supports may be designed without considering anchor loads. When the anchor loads become available, supports will be checked individually for the actual anchor load and reinforced if necessary. ‘Since modifications to concrete pipe supports after construction are costly and time consuming, an imaginary anchor load wll be considered in the design when actual anchor loads are not available. This imaginary anchor load will be equal to 2 kips for ‘beam spans greater than 15 feet, and | kip for beam spans less than 15 feet. This load ‘ill be applied at the 1/4 span locations ofthe beam at each level, Thirty percent ofthe imaginary load is to be considered the thermal component, and 70 percent isthe friction component. ‘Pipe supports will normally be designed to resist the following combinations of loads: = Gravity loads (empry, operating, and test). Gravity loads (empty) + transverse wind loads or earthquake loads. Gravity loads (operating) + transverse wind loads or earthquake loads + thermal ‘component of anchor loads, "= Gravity Toads (operating) + friction loads + thermal component of anchor loads. * Gravity loads (operating) + anchor loads (friction and thermal components). Structural EngineeringPractice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 110¢196 Page 6 of 13 VOR DANTE PIPE SUPPORTS Design Stresses Deflections Of Pipe ‘Supports DESIGN OF PIPE SUPPORT COMPONENTS: ‘tis assumed that friction loads, including the friction component of anchor loads, do ‘not occur at the same time as wind or earthquake loads. Engineering judgment or project design specifications may dictate otherwise. Also, project requirements ‘Sometimes stipulate that test loads be combined with a reduced wind load. ‘Usually, allowable steel stresses may be increased 1/3 for load combinations that include ‘wind of earthquake loads; however, the allowable stress increases must be specified in the design specifications of the project. ‘When applying ultimate strength load factors for concrete design, all gravity loads will be considered as dead loads. Although platform loads are mostly live loads, itis ‘acceptable to include them with gravity loads as long as they are small; Jess than 10 percent of the total gravity load on the member. Platform framing members should be ‘esigned for live loads with ive load factors. Friction and anchor loads should be ‘considered as dead loads for ultimate strength design. “The deflection of structural members in a pipe support is an important consideration in the design of the piping system. Whether the deflection is that of a ansverse beam due to piping anchors or lateral deflection of the bent due to wind loads, the criteria for the deflection willbe a specified in project requirements, However, where the Pipe Stress Engineer indicates that the deflection ofa particular anchor is critical, where multiple anchors are located on the same support, or where there is an absence of other Lines to + provide restraint, the deflection should be calculated and reviewed with the Pipe Stress Engineer for concurrence, “The components of pipe supports discussed below include rigid frames (bents), longitudinal struts, vertical bracing, connections, and foundations, Refer to the attached figures for reference, Also discussed arc the structural elements of pipe bridges and small supporss. “The design of pipe support components is primarily based on stress constraints. At times, deflections and settlement of pipe supports merit special consideration, thereby iffecting the design ofthe pipe support components. In such cases, the design ofthe ipe support will be coordinated with the Pipe Stress Engineer as mentioned above to ‘ensure that movement constraints are met ‘Structural EngineeringFLUOR DANIEL PIPE SUPPORTS Rigid Frames (Bents) ‘Transverse Beams Practice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 110¢t96 Page 7 of 13 ‘Normally, a stiffness analysis of a transverse bent composed of transverse beams and ‘columns is performed to determine all forces, reactions, and displacements produced by ‘the loads and load combinations given above. For analysis of concrete frames, approximate slendemess effects such as moment ‘magnification or a second order analysis may be performed. Appropriate stiffness values for the beams and columns should be used according to ACI (American Concrete Institute) 318 in either type of analysis Precast concrete bents will be analyzed for handling stresses induced from being transported and lifted. ‘The beam must be designed to resist all forces, moments, and shears calculated from the above analysis. For the flexural design of steel beams, the unbraced length of the compression flange should be considered 1/3 ofthe total span. However, for axial loads, the total span of the beam should be used forthe effective length and modified by the appropriate effective length factor for each direction. ‘This factor should be equal to 1.0 for the weak direction of the beam. In the strong axis for moment connected ends, the effective length factor should be 0.65, ‘Under normal loading conditions, torsional effects need not be considered since the pipe ‘supported by the beam limits deflection and rotation of the beam to the extent that torsional stresses are minimal. However, torsion should be considered on an individual ‘basis when unusually large loads such as large anchor loads are applied to the beam flange. - Intermediate transverse beams are sometimes required to reduce the span for smaller pipe and cable trays. Also, they are required at pipe bridges. Generally, intermediate transverse beams are supported by struts or the chords of pipe bridge trusses. They are designed as simply supported beams. Structural Engincering(Columns Practice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 110ct96 Page 8 of 13 ‘The columns must be capable of resisting all forces, moments and shears calculated from the rigid frame analysis. The frame analysis should be made using the following ‘column base conditions: Steel pipe supports ‘Strutted ~ fixed base in both the transverse and longitudinal directions, or pinned base in both the transverse and longitudinal directions, with the major axis of the column in the transverse direction. In general, the fixed base condition results in a smaller superstructure and a larger foundation with smaller lateral deflections. The pinned base ‘Condition results ina larger superstructure and smaller foundations with larger tateral deflections. ‘Unstruted ~ fixed bases in both directions, with the major axis of the column in the longitudinal direction. A common design concept is to provide bracing in the transverse direction, = Concrete pipe supports “Fixed atthe top of the socket (for socket type footings) or the base plate. ‘The effective length factors for the design of columns will be as follows: = Longitudinal Strutted - Table C-C2.1, Pages 5 - 135, AISC (American Institute for Steel Construction) ASD 9th Ed. ‘Unstratted - K: or lesser value approved by the Project Lead Structural Engineer = Transverse Steel - Table C-C2.1, Pages 5 ~ 135, AISC ASD 9th Edition, or Figure C-C2.2, pages 5 - 137, AISC ASD 9th Edition, or another method approved by the Project Lead Structural Engineer Concrete - Figure R10.12.1, ACI-318-95 ‘Columns for concrete pipe supports should be 18 inches square minimum. ‘A design check should be performed for the temporary lifting of precast concrete bent. Structural EngineeringFLUOR DANIEL PIPE SUPPORTS ‘Longitudinal Struts Vertical Bracing Connections ‘Moment Connections Base Plates Practice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 110c196 Page 9 of 13 In areas where gravity loading on struts is anticipated, beam struts should be used. ‘Beam struts should be designed for the greater of 50 percent of the gravity loading on the most heavily loaded transverse beam or the actual loading. The 50 percent loading accounts for the usual electrical conduits and piping takeoffs. ‘This loading should not be added to the design load for the column or footing, since pipes contributing to the load on the strats reduces the load on the transverse beams. Prior to issuing any pipe ‘support drawings as AFC (Approved for Construction), the Design Engineer should ‘check piping drawings to verify that any struts subjected to unusually large loads have been given special consideration. Longitudinal struts will be designed to resist axial forces produced by longitudinal loads For normal conditions, longitudinal loads may be assumed to be transmitted to the struts at each column without reconsidering column bending in combination with the rigid frame analysis, However, ifthe vertical dimension between transverse beam and the strut in question is large (exceeding 3 feet) or large anchor loads occur on the ‘transverse beam, the column stresses must be reconsidered. ‘Vertical bracing may be used to transmit longitudinal loads from the struts to the foundations. K-bracing (inverted chevron bracing) is most often used for this purpose, ‘Normally, the maximum spacing of braced bays should be limited to 150 feet (Operating access is an important consideration when locating bracing. The Structural Engineer will coordinate the placement of bracing with the Piping and Electrical groups, Slotted strut connections are somtimes used to isolate the longitudinal loads on a run of pipe support to specific braced bays. The locations of slotted connections should be reviewed with the Pipe Stress Engineer, Connection details described below include moment connections, base plates, and other connections commonly used in pipe support design ‘Moment connections shall be designed in accordance with Structural Engineering Practice 670.215.1209; Bolted End Plate Moment Connections. ‘Base plates will be designed in accordance with Structural Engineering Practice {670.215,1208: Base Plate Design Criteria, with anchor bolts designed in accordance ‘with Structural Engineering Practice 670.215.1207: Anchor Bolt Design Criteria Structural EngineeringPractice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 110ct96 Page 10 of 13, ROR DANE PIPE SUPPORTS Other Connections Foundations Pipe Bridges ‘Bracing and framed beam connections will be designed in accordance with the AISC ‘Manual, ‘These connections will be as specified and detailed in the project standard drawings; however, where the standard details are not appropriate or adequate, proper details will be shown on the construction drawings. Special attention will be given to standard shear connections used in situations with high tension joads such as struts of large pipe supports, and especially when dealing ‘with longitudinal air cooler loads. The connection angles should be checked according to the Hanger Type Connections section of the AISC Manual. ‘Suggested references for unusual steel connections are Salmon and Johnson, Stee! ‘Structures Design and Behavior and Blodgett, Design of Welded Structures. For connections between stee! struts and concrete columns, which are usually required ‘when using precast concrete bents, some type of insert will be required, Embedded plates cas into the concrete member with welded ebar or headed studs for anchorage or through bolts with sleeves cast in bents may be used. Expansion anchors are not preferred. In addition, the PCI Design Handbook describes the design of various types Bf connections. The selected connection detail should be used uniformly throughout the project in order tobe economical. “The type of foundations to be used will be dictated by the site conditions. Foundations ‘will be designed using the support reactions atthe column bases from the rigid frame [analysis and the braced bay. Foundation design parameters are normally stated in the project design specifications. “The stability rato shall be checked forthe most critical overturning condition. For high ‘wind areas, the empty load condition generally controls. In high seismic zones, the hraviest load results in higher overturning forces. When a rigid frame is supported on 2 cor more foundations, the stability of the entre system will be considered. Engineering jodgment ol be used to determine ifthe stability ofthe foundation system or an {individual foundation within the system is more critical Prior to making a pipe bridge design, the Design Engineer should verify with the Piping group where pipes will be supported on the bridge. A pipe bridge should be designed as individual components including vertical tnisses (or girders), horizontal trusses, and bridge bents. Refer to the Attachments 04 and 5, A computer space frame solution for a pipe bridge is generally not required or recommended duc tothe excessive amount of {imme required to make the computer model. However, where complex loading or ‘unusual geometric configurations are present, a space frame solution is desirable. Structural EngineeringFLUOR DANIEL PIPE SUPPORTS Vertical Trusses Horizontal Trusses Bridge Bent ‘Small Supports ‘T-Supports Sleeper Supports Practice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 110196 Page 11 of 13, ‘The vertical truss of a pipe bridge should be designed as a plane truss supporting gravity Joads only, In many cases, the vertical russ can be fabricated as a single shop welded ‘unit. The connections of the truss should be designed to accommodate field assembly of ‘the truss as individual members or as a unit. Horizontal trusses shouldbe designed as plane trusses to resist all lateral loads applied to the truss such as wind or lateral earthquake loads. Also, consideration should be ‘given to providing lateral support to intermediate transverse beams, especially where anchors or large diameter pipes are present. ‘The bridge bent is designed similar to atypical pipe support bent with the exception that truss loads are applied as concentrated loads to the bent. Should the member sizes of the bridge bent became excessive, transverse vertical bracing should be used with the approval of the client. Small supports include T-supports, sleeper supports, and miscellaneous pipe supports requested by the Piping/Pipe Stress groups. Refer to Attachments 04 and 05. These supports usually require a minimal amount of structural analysis; however, they often require a significant amount of design time to ensure that geometric constraints are satisfied. ‘T-supports are usually single columns with short cantilevered beams attached to support piping or electrical conduitcable trays. The effective length factor. K, ofthe column in both the transverse and longitudinal direction, is generally equal to 2.0. Where engineering judgment is exercised to allow a lower value for K, especially inthe longitudinal direction (in the weak axis ofthe column), the value and base assumptions will be approved by the Project Lead Structural Engineer. Guide to Pipe Support Design. by C. V. Char provides more details on effective length factor. ‘Sleeper supports are used to elevate pipes at low levels above the ground, Their design is relatively simple; however, close coordination with pipe stress is required to ensure that anchor loads are properly handled and settlement sensitive areas addressed. Structural EngineeringMiscellancous Pipe Supports REFERENCES Practice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 10ct96 Page 12 of 13, ‘Most miseellancous pipe supports such as hase ells and hangers are provided by the ‘ping group; however, there are cases where the Structural group is required to provide these supports, especially in the case of hold-downs at compressors. When designing ‘small individual pipe supports, the usual safety factors applied to larger structures do not ‘adequately reflect the uncertainty ofthe loading thatthe small support will subjected to ‘Engineering judgment should be exercised to ensure a safe and economical design. ‘ACI (American Concrete Institute) 318-95 ‘AISC (American Institute for Steel Construction) ASD 9th Edition. PCI (Prestressed Concrete Institute). Precast and Prestressed Concrete, PCI Design Handbook. Third Edition, Chicago, 1985. Blodgett, Omer W. Design of Welded Structures. Eighth Printing, The James F. Lincoln Are Welding Foundation. Cleveland, Ohio, 1976. Char, C. V. Hydrocarbon Processing, Guide to Pipe Support Design. Vol, 58, 1979. ‘Salmon, Charles G. and John E. Jonson, Stee! Structures Design and Behavior, 2nd Edition, Harper & Row, Publishers, New York 1980. Structural Engineering Practice 670.215.1207: Anchor Bolt Design Criteria Structural Engineering Practice 670.215.1208; Base Plate Design Criteria Structural Engineering Practice 670.215.1209; Bolted End Plate Moment Connections Structural Engineering, Practice 670.215.1215: Wind Load Calculation Structural Engineering Practice 670.215.1216: Earthquake Engineering Structural Engineering ‘Practice 670.215.1231: Drilled Pier Foundations Structural EngineeringPractice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 110ct96 Page 13 of 13 FLUOR DANIEL, PIPE SUPPORTS ATTACHMENTS Attachment 01; Weights OF Pipe Attachment ‘Weight Of Piping Insulation Attachment 03: ‘Typical Air Cooler Loads Attachment 04: ‘Typical Piperack Configuration Attachment 05: Figure 1. Typical Pipe Bridge igure 2. Miscellaneous Pipe Supports Attachment 06: ‘Sample Design 1: Stee! Piperack Design Attachment 07: Sample Design 2: Concrete Piperack Design Attachment 08: ‘Sample Design 3: Concrete Piperack Design With Seismic Design Structural EngineeringaxPractice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 110c196 Attachment OL Page 1 of 1 FLUOR DANTE, = WEIGHTS OF PIPE 7ST Standard Weight) —- T= XS (Heavy Weight) —- | - 30K 160 (tra Heavy Weight) D [a |: | We | ww] weft [we | ww] we [ ot 7 we [ ww [ wr am) | @) | | op | oo | oo | a | oo | old | lp | de) | ol | oO | oo T} 1320] 0133) 17] 04| 21) o179| 22/ 03] 25| oase| 37] oa] 38 Taa[ 1875] 014s] 27) 09| 35| 0200) 36[ o7| 43] o37s[ 60] oa] 64 2] 2375| ois] 37| 15] sal oats] sol 13| 63] ooo] sa] os] 93 3| 3500) 021s] _76| 32| 108] 0300] 103] 29| 131 o.oo] ie6| 18] 204 4| 4500} 0237] 108| 5s] 163] 0337] iso] s0| 200| osv| 276] 34] 309 3 6 3 5.600] 0.258] 147] 88| 235| 0375| 209] so[ 290| 0750] sag| 57 446 6425] 0280, 19.0] 125| 315| 0432) 286| 113[ 399] osed| 532] 82| 614 2.625] 0.322] 286] 217| 503] 0.500] 434| 198] 632{ o506| 748| 158] 906 To 10.750] 0365) 405| 342| 747| 0500] sa8| s24| s7i[tazs| use[ 246[ 1403 i2| 12.750) 0375] 49.6, 49.0| 986] 0300| 655] 470] 1125{ 1312] 104| 3491 1953 14| 14000] 0375| s46| so] tiaa| 0500[ 722] 525| 129.7| 1406] 189.3 426] 2319 16 | 16000] 0375] 62.6 | 792| 1418] osoo[ e28| 766] i594] 1593[ 2453 | 55.9| 3012 18.000] 0.375 707] 1013| 1719| ooo] 935| sea] to19| i718] 290| 722| 3712 20000] 0375| _787| 1261| 2048| 0.s00| 1042| 1i29| 2371] 1.968] 3794] 978 | 4672 722.000] 0375, 867| 1537| 2404| 0.500{ 1149] 150.1 | 265.0 | *1.000| 224.5] 136.1 | 360.6 34,000] 0.3751 947 1840| 278.7| 0.500| 1256| 1s00| sose| 2303[ sa24| 1270] 6694 26.000] 0.375| 1027| 2170| 319.7| 0.500] 1363 212.7] 349.0 | 1.000] 2673] 196.0 463.3 28,000] 0.375] 110-7| 252.7| 363.5 | 0.500] 147.0| 248.1| 395.1 | *1.000] 286 | 230.1 | 518.7 30.000, 0375| 1188 | 2912| 409.9| 0.500[ 1577| 2862] 443.9 | *1.000| 310.0] 266.8] s768] “I.” 32.000] 0.375] 1268| 332.4| 459.1| 0500] 1es4| 3271] 49s | *1.000| 331.4] 306.3] 637.7 34.000| 0375| 1348| 3763| stia| 0.00] 179.1 [ 3706 549.7 | 1.000] 352.8] 348.5| 7013 36 | 36.000] 0.375] 142.8| 422.9| 565.7[ 0.500| 189.8 | 4169 | 606.7| *1.000| 3742] 393.4] 757.6 ‘a2 | 42,000| 0375] 166.9| 579.1] 746.0| 0.500] 2218] s721| 793.9| *1.000] aaa 544.5] 902.8 g{els|e/R[e|s)s |e Nominal Diameter : Outside Diameter 7) ‘Wall Thickness Empty Weight of Pipe ‘Weight of Water Weight of Pipe Full of Water ‘Maximum Stock Size D oD t We ww WF ‘Structural Engineeringi Practice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 110¢196 Attachment 02 Page 1 of 1 FLUOR DANTE === ‘WEIGHT OF PIPING INSULATION ‘To determine the weight per foot of any piping insulation, use the pipe size and nominal insulation thickness to find the insulation weight factor, F, in the chart shown below. Then, multiply F by the density of the insulation in pounds per cubic foot Example: For 4 inch pipe with 4 inch nominal thickness insulation, pounds per cubic foot, then the insulation weight is 0.77 x 1 ‘Usual insulation density is 12 pof. 0.77. Ifthe insulation density is 12 24 1bin. fRominal ‘Nominal Insulation Thickness [Pipe Size Tay pels) ee eye] T{0057|o10| 016) 023, oat] ool —| —| —| | —| riz] o0se{ ori] 021] 029] 038, oa] | —| | -—| —| 2} 00s] ora] o2i| o2s{ 037] o«7| oss) =| | | 3] o10f oi7| 02s] oa] oa] oso] oss] os) —| |_| 4[013{ oar] 030] oas| ost] os] a7] 095|_ tol || S| oas{ 2a] 034| 0.5) om} oss] toa] tao) | 6| 017] o27| 03s ost as] os7|ita[ is] 8 —l os] oa7] oa6| oso] osm] tir] 36|_ 16] 175] 10 =] 043] osof ors] oss] ia] 132] 154] 76] 99] | 2 =|__os0{ os] 0. x07] 128|_1sa]__7a| ise] 224] 2.30 4 [esi 070] 090] uaa]. usa] uy] isi] 207] 234 16 Posi} _o7s[ tor] aa] taal 7a zu] 229/ 2.58] 18 =[os] osm] taaf iat] tea tz] aai] asi] 282] 3a] 20 = o7of 096] 123[ 150] 179[ 200{ 2.40| 2.73] 3.06] 3.40] 24 [oss] nis] taaluaef af zs] 2.80] aac] 3.54] 3.92] Structural EngineeringPractice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 110¢t96 Attachment 03. Page 1 of 1 FLUOR DANIEL ‘TYPICAL AIR COOLER LOADS (For estimating only) (Loads shown on pipe support column) Span Length, L 20! 2s 30" Dead Load 35 kcal 42 klco 50 kieol Live Load 3.5 Keol 4 kicol 5 kicol ‘Wind Load: ‘Transverse Shear Skicol 5.5 klcol 6 kicol ‘Wind Couple, Vertical +4 SKool +45 Wool +/-4.5 kcal Longitudinal Shear {at braced bay only) 18 kibay 18 k/oay 18 kibay Notett! ‘Wind loads shown are based on a design wind speed of 110 mph. For other design wind speed, V, multiply wind loads above by Vi/L10 Structural EngineeringPractice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 10ct96 Attachment 04 Page 1 of 1 FLUOR DANIEL ‘TYPICAL PIPERACK CONFIGURATION as eeLeSeas {LONGTUDINAL x a RECTION a | BA —t+—__—4 C owsruowa ‘STRUT PLAN. BENT. TRANSVERSE TRANSVERSE ORECTION INTERVEDIATE TRANSVERSE. BEAM TRANSVERSE BEAM PIPE was 4 J— coum TYPICAL BENT, SECTION A-A NTERMEDIATE TRANSVERSE BEAM TRANSVERSE BENT LONGTTUDINAL STRUT VERTICAL BRACING ONGITUDINAL SECTION 8-8 ‘Structural Engincering“~Practice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 110c196 Attachment 05 Page 1 of 1 FLUOR DANIEL, FIGURE1: TYPICAL PIPE BRIDGE FIGURE 2: MISCELLANEOUS PIPE SUPPORTS igure 1 HORIZONTAL INTERUEDIATE BRACING TRANSVERSE BEAM PLAN Hi [TAL_TF Pa ea i Ke > oe a KNAW Corn ono © xno BRAGNC |_—prioce BENT _evevanon VERTICAL TRUSS. ‘Figure 2 — saccre ems He : 2 ee, ca nae ELEVATION. EuevAton PER: Structural EngineeringPractice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 110196 Attachment 06 Page 1 of 12 FLUOR DANIEL ‘SAMPLE DESIGN 1 : STEEL PIPERACK DESIGN Wi2x40 (+5! (TYP) ‘W12x40 15 BAYS ® 20'-0" 0.C. = 300'-0" W10x33. (+2'-6' PLAN © TOS ELEV 116'-0" (UNO) W10X33 (+10'-0") Structural EngineeringPractice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 1106196 ‘Avtachment 05. Page? of 12 FLUOR DANIEL oe ‘SAMPLE DESIGN 1 : STEEL’ PIPERACK DESIGN Tos = EL _121'-0" Wwi2 aay Tos EL_116'-0" wiz 7 beer 3 2 | z g EXDPUaTE 2 z = BOTTOM OF See eeeree Tew DaMLAB. TYPICAL BENT ELEVATION Structural EngineeringPractice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 110¢196 Attachment 06 Page 3 of 12 JLUOR DANIEL === ‘SAMPLE DESIGN 1 : STEEL PIPERACK DESIGN TYP TOS Wid EL 118'-6" west 2 = BOTTOM OF BASE. PL. EL 101-0" 7 TYPICAL BRACED BAY ELEVATION Structural Engineering,Practice 670 215 1250 ‘Publication Date 110ct96 ‘Attachment 06 Page 4 of 12 ‘FLUOR DANIEL _ SAMPLE DESIGN 4 : STEEL PIPERACK DESIGN 9" > T.0. GROUT 5'-0"S 3 a Sg EL. 101-0" e 5 = 3 3 fare Te \ 6 oO 0 z + ae HPREL <0. 8 lo ° \5 N Fle rf LSE 4-134" DIA ANCHOR BOLTS ¢ ~ ° 6-8 Bs 10" z LAP a ° a wi = te *B (TYP) 4 TIE: SECTION "A-A" F ELEVATION = Structural EngineeringPractice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 110196 Attachment 06 Page 5 of 12 FLUOR DANIEL ‘SAMPLE DESIGN 1 : STEEL PIPERACK DESIGN GIVEN References + AISC Manual of Steel Construction, ASD sth Edition + Piping Drawings Materi + Steel- ASTMA36_—_ (Allow 1/3 increase in allowable stresses for wind.) + Bolts- ASTMAS25N Desian Loads (20' Bay Spacing) Gravity Loads: Piping on beams @ TOS El's 116-0" & 121-0" (Operating) + OL, =0.04"'x 20 =0.8"" onmembers6&7- OS x < 18.5 24" Cooling water lines _( @ TOS EL 121'-0") + OL = 20278.7- 40x 2)= 3.97% onmember 7 @ x= 20, 22.5' 24° h Flare line (Assume 20% H,0 weight) + OL, = 20(94,7 + 0.2 x 184.0) = 2.63" @ Joint 4 Note : Flare line will NOT be hydrotested on the piperack. Transverse + Wind on Piping and Struts, Joint Loads: 3.4°@ JT.2, 56° @JT3, 13° @JT4 + Wind on Columns, Member Loads: 0.07" on members 1 thru 3, 11, 12. Note: Wind load calculations not shown for brevity. See practice 670.215.1215 "Wind Load Calculations” for procedures. Load Combinations + Basic Load Cases 1. Gravity (Dead load of structure without piping) 2. Piping ( Weight of piping and contents) 3. Wind Load (Transverse direction) + Combinations 4, Empty Condition = Gravity + 60% Piping 5, Operating Condition = Gravity + Piping 6. Empty + Wind = Empty Conditon + Wind Load 7. Empty - Wind = Empty Condition - Wind Load 8. Operating + Wind = Operating Condition + Wind Load 8, Operating - Wind = Operating Condition - Wind Load Note: Allow 1/3 increase in allowable stresses (0.75 factor in computer run) for combinations with wind. Structural EngineeringFLUOR DANIEL Practice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 10ct96 Attachment 06 Page 6 of 12 SAMPLE DESIGN 1 : STEEL PIPERACK DESIGN REQUIRED Determine steel member sizes, connections, and the foundations fo SOLUTION ‘Design Mode! Header | a §| a al Wows, Note : STAAD Il plane frame used to analyze model. Itis OK to use computer code checking for final calcs. ‘A3-D model or additional hand cales are needed to check beam weak axis bending. 3 3| Foed @ base. Wi2t0 B] 3 the given loading conditions. @ rosme ~ OI _ rosanee © _ ros asw wan Structural Engineering,Practice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 110196 Attachment 06 Page 7 of 12 ‘FLUOR DANIEL SAMPLE DESIGN 4 : STEEL PIPERACK DESIGN Member Design BOTTOM BEAM: MEMBER 6 Governing Load Combination: 9 (Operating - Wind), M,=76.9°°*, P= 15.1% @ Joint #2 Try a Wi2xd0 Beam KL" 1,0 2.5) (1. an (§), = 192802 ys54 > co = 1081 = FH 88H 128 s021> He ERp rot > 01s = 98828)02) . 36.9 = Fy,= 103.42 KS! = 1.28 KSI, 23 20.33, Fe=24Ksl Cine = 0. fy = BBG2 = 47.78KS1 Em fix 29.21 + 28014 2095 <1.33 OK, ae 703.42. TOP BEAM: MEMBER 7 ‘Goveming Load Combination: 8 (Operating + Wind), M,=682"*, P=19.2" @ JT.7 ‘Since loads are close to those for the bottom beam, Try a W12x40 beam Check weak axis bending using operating load comb. 5, P= 14.9% + Friction Loads Structural EngineeringPractice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 110¢196 Attachment 06 Page 8 of 12 FLUOR DANIEL SAMPLE DESIGN 1 : STEEL PIPERACK DESIGN M,C From computer printout ) (Req 7 1-59 kips) fi = 35.2012) fon t= S20) a otansi, oe = 1802) fw, 8.29 - fy = TEED = a20Ksl, pia YP eost fa, Crater Co toy 85, Fe*7 ae = 020+7—© (0.34) + 120.31) (ret (: fru O-3 i) (-#8) - * = 020+0.20+0.39 = 0.88<10 OK. Use W12 x 40 Structural EngineeringPractice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 110c196 Attachment 06 Page 9 of 12 FLUOR DANIEL ‘SAMPLE DESIGN 1 : STEEL PIPERACK DESIGN ‘COLUMNS Member 5, Load Comb. 8 (Operating + Wind), M, = 68.2"*, P=19.2* @ Joint7 Try W10x33 Column KL). 1.0017.5)¢1 (4) = 2007-902) « 408.2.< 126.41 108.2 Ce Fy = CaF, = 0.33 x 36 = 11.88 KSI =0.17> 0.15 fox 23:38 zaseksl, f= 2538 «106 From Figure C-C2.2, AISC Manual, (ATONS 4170/5) _ = 1705) _ Ga = SOAS IUD) 3.68, Gar Gini 274, Kx = 1.85 = 1.95(5)012) ce SOD) «26.5, Fi, = 220.82 KSI Co fox 0.85, + =o47+ 1.06) =1,08 <1.33 OK. 7) 4 a (-4) Fee foe = 1.98 4 4,06=1.18<1.33 OK. = Tory Fe 22 Use W10x33 Column BRACED BAY a Friction Force: Oper. Shear on Trans. Beams = 10.36" Y Se ra = + AiSBents_ = 13.9%) Si we x F 0.1 x (10.36 + 1583) x spree: = 13.95) Side sy 6.95 K 6.95 K 1216 K 12.16 K Structural EngineeringPractice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 11096 ‘Attachment 06 Page 10 of 12 FLUOR DANIEL ‘SAMPLE DESIGN 1 : STEEL PIPERACK DESIGN Strut: Heaviest Trans Beam Shear = 15.64" ooo 15.84 yo5= i rereraRece rosin rere Bap x05 = Oa KLE 20 2 m= 0.63 20" = 31.5" From Beam Tables in AISC, p2-173, Try W10x33, Myo, = 52" From Column Tables, AISC, p3-30, Pri = 95% Sie 1384815 -o1sso6ts07e<10 OK Fi 95” 52 Use W10x33 Strut BRACING Pane = 14.0%, (KL), = (KL), = 20.2' From Column Tables, Use 24x 4x 1/4 (Pao, = 16°) KL) ) Use 2-L4 x 4 x 1/4. for Bracing = 20202) « 194 < = 20202) = 194<200 OK. Xmin Connections MOMENT CONNECTION Note: Moment Gonnections not shown for brevity. See technical practice 670.215.1209 " Bolted End Plate Moment Connections” for procedures. (Use 4A XXX215.5210, Sheet 1 (3/4" End PL w! §/16" welds ) BASE PLATE. Note: Base Plate design not shown for brevity. See technical practice 670.215.1208 " Base Plate Design Criteria for procedures. Also see practice 670.215.1207, Anchor Bolt Design Criteria, for anchor bolt design procedure. Use STD. Base PL detail 9 / 0.215.030 for W10 column, with 1-1/2" Anchor Botts ‘Structural Engineering,Practice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 110c196 Attachment 06 Page 11 of 12 FLUOR DANIEL, ‘SAMPLE DESIGN 1 : STEEL PIPERACK DESIGN BRACING CONNECTIONS + Bolts: A-325-N - 3/47 @ Min Allow = 18.6" , Tables 1-D & 1-E, AISC, p4-5,6 # Bolts REQD = 14/18.6 Use 2 8/4" § A-325-N Bolts Gusset PL: 3/8" PL per STD. Fy = 14.4KSI ros <-139__=26" L, REQD= @argeaH 72° Weld : 1/4" per STD. 43.9" tyne 928 (4) 2 See eee eee = 4.87" 0928 D x @ Sides) ann Use STD. DET. 12/ XXX.215.6170, Sheet 2 Note: Where WT bracing is used w/ flange attached to ‘moment due to the offset between the cent be considered in the design of the WT section. Gusset PL :-3/8" PL per STD. 42.19 Ly REQD= Gareag 722 6.95, Lip REQD = oaraycraay = 12" + Weld: 1/4" per STD. Lyw REQD = _pAZtS— = 1.64 Tazeyaye * et sz 0058 (oma) the gusset PL, it is required that the eccentric of the column / beam and the centroid of the WT ETA 4 / XXK.218.8970, 5 (STD) ‘Structural EngineeringPractice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 110¢196 ‘Attachment 06 Page 12 of 12 FLUOR DANIEL SAMPLE DESIGN 1 : STEEL PIPERACK DESIGN + Check STD shear clip angle connection for tension on strut, Tux Per AISC Hanger - Type connections, p4-89 = 13.9% or < 13.9% NG. =8.5x127= For 3/8" x 5-1/2" LG clip angles ,b=2, 7, <. Clip angles are inadequate ‘Use STD Shear PL Connection for Struts to Colurns Foundation Desian Note : Foundation design not shown for brevity. See technical practice 670.218.1231 for drilled pile foundations, See technical practice 670.215.1232 for driven pile supported foundations. Structural EngineeringPractice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 110196 Attachment 07 Page 1 of 21 FLUOR DANIEL SAMPLE DESIGN 2 : CONCRETE PIPERACK DESIGN 2-0" PS 108, PS 107, 45'-0" PS 106, BM SPLICE (Sk-5) aa | ° 2 5 8 : g ® @- 7 105, i | pareee f ‘i a i 5 ae R ge oa) | a w © Sea 8 fs a 7 ® & ee z a Ee a a & a PS 103, PS 102, 45'-0" 33 é3) Structural EngineeringPractice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 110ct96 Attachment 07 Page 2 of 21 FLUOR DANIEL 5 a 3 2 E F 5 SAMPLE DESIGN wO-,LOL “13. ‘Id 3Svg ‘0° 20-61 “Ta. ¢ NOILWASTA LNIG WOdAL +S dAL (aAL? WV EXHOS, (dAL) “DS uO% t ‘OL 0-.SCL “13 FOL Z0h “TA SOL (PAS) Vn Structural EngiPractice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 110196 Attachment 07 Page 3 of 21 FLUOR DANIEL SAMPLE DESIGN 2 : CONCRETE PIPERACK DESIGN n gave xe W24 (FPF) TBS. EL 1e7=1 4 TOS. v feet ELies’-1" wio «FPF ios, Tee Te —a tye es ae W10 (FPF) TOS. ana EL. 116-0" TYP. 1 es 1 BG. BASE PL EL. 101-0" TYPICAL BENT ELEVATION | 1 LIFTING LUG: TYP eee eee eee eee i ( TRAILING LUG YO LIFTING ARRANGEMENT Structural EngineeringPractice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 110196 Attachment 07 Page 4 of 21 FLUOR DANIEL. a SAMPLE DESIGN 2 ; CONCRETE PIPERACK DESIGN ga “3 TIES @ 12" C/C ae a 25" CLEAR 12-*9 ah FaveueAiSIneN TtlteH xe (TYP-EA. SIDE) Las (eo ie \ a ‘| i* al le | \e \S, 2 ANY fe" CLEAR +3 STIRRUPS YP) @ 10" C/C SECTION "A-A" (SK-2) SECTION "B-8" (SK-2) 2-4" SQ. 7-0" 1-0" A, TYP | TYP 2" ye" DETAIL 6-15" DIA HOLES \ ¥ : PL 1 Yo" x28"'x2'-4"" DETAIL Structural EngineeringPractice 670 245 1250 Publication Date 110ct96 Attachment 07 Page 5 of 21 FLUOR DANIEL SAMPLE DESIGN 2: CONCRETE PIPERACK DESIGN FOR AouTs 20" CONCRETE Vy" STIFF PL | COLUMN Puts orxt-8/" W24_ BEAM W24 BEAM ee el 3 & ‘a elo %s Ss ss 7 4 E 4-146" DIA sols POR g PL¥eei3"xt-9" 1 DIA AL . (TYP. TEN. & COMP.) BEAM SPLICE DETAIL (Sk-1) T.0.C. EL 125'-0" ‘Al wa PL 1'x10"x1'-9" Ye Z . 4 hea oo “es Z iv ee * aA Hy PL Panta eceeec ye L— Face oF VL aye CONGRETE eae : + FACE OF “itis os HORIZ. SPACING Stbse ais f Horiz. space DETAL = : DETAL. ic sees a ‘Structural EngineeringPractice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 110¢t96 ‘Attachment 07 Page 6 of 21 FLUOR DANIEL = SAMPLE DESIGN 2 : CONCRETE PIPERACK DESIGN TY" PL aVa"@ Si iB SOK don se" outs FoR PL TYenxtgnt-o" USE PL & STUDS LIFTING LUG DETAIL FROM DETAIL 5/Sk-5 sFeeeeeee ea atearaE EEC Nore: DETAIL TING ARRANGEMENT / DETAIL es SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE RIGGING CONTRACTOR, ae 1A HOLE arn Ye" PL ee W/V NUT t Yel e one eno | (2° THREAD nae Meee : LENGTH PET ts resents [geste ene = (ut TO Be a =) 7 94 GRID oo oe aye) Seg ats 1Ya" O14 307 ROD W/ THREADED ENDS & 2-NUTS WASHERS & 114" 20" 50 STD WALL PIPE ‘TACK WELD jt Sleeve cry) SECTION (Sk-4) TALING LUG DETAIL ~ Structural Engineering,Practice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 110196 Attachment 07 Page 7 of 21 FLUOR DANIEL, SAMPLE DESIGN 2: CONCRETE PIPERACK DESIGN — 6-12" DIA AB,'s FOUNDATION PLAN _ gy oe 3 30 Rout g 8 EL. 101-0" 4 ON 27 a 4 Ait) $7.0 12" EW. THB SECTION "D-D" ‘Structural Engineering,Practice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 110c196 ‘Attachment 07 Page 8 of 21 FLUOR DANIEL Ss SAMPLE DESIGN 2 : CONCRETE PIPERACK DESIGN GIVEN References ACI 318-95 AISC Steel Manual -ASD Sth ed. Piping Plans Air Cooler Vendor Data als Concrete : f, = 4000 PSI for PIR Bent, f, = 3000 PS! for Foundation, Yye= 150 PCF Reinforcing Steel : f, = 60 KSI Steel :f,= 36KSI_- Bolts : 3/4" ¢ AS25N ‘Anchor Bolts : A36 Soil: Allow Net Soll Bearing ‘Ye= 120 PCF Water Table Depth KSF @ 5° Below grade. (Allow 1/S increase due to wind ) 6° Below Grade Design Loads Gravity + Structure : Include weight of Concrete and Steel members 1 Piping (Operating) :w = 0.04 x 20' = O.8KLF @ member 5- 6 Tos. x EL ie7-1 TOG. ELies-1 wio (FPF? TYP b~ on BO. BASE PL EL. 101-0" TYPICAL BENT ELEVATION I — LIFTING Lus—” TYP TRAILING LUG 7 lscioeaonh Toco] LIFTING ARRANGEMENT Structural EngineeringPractice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 110ct96 ‘Attachment 07 Page 4 of 21 FLUOR DANIEL —~ SAMPLE DESIGN 2 : CONCRETE PIPERACK DESIGN a8 “3 TES e 1" cve YF oie 2%" CLEAR 12-09 SE (TYP-EA. SIDE! Ete (e oO \ @ ‘@) ie le o le @7_@ 4 AY if" CLEAR #3. STIRRUPS (TYP) @ 10" C/E SECTION "A-A" (SK-2) SECTION "8-8" (SK-2) 2-4" SQ. To" 1-0" A TYP | TYP 2" a | < e a g = < * a s 4 c— s = 7 1 Nr PL 1%" x28"x2'-4" DETAIL DETAIL, a ‘Structural EngineeringFLUOR DANIEL, Practice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 110c196 Attachment 07 Page 5 of 21 SAMPLE DESIGN 2 : CONCRETE PIPERACK DESIGN 20" CONCRETE Yo" STIFF PL | COLUMN PLYgte 6'x1'-8/4" W24 BEAM W24 BEAM W24 BEAM 3 e 2 ‘ 2 ahi an aan x gq 3 1! | 3 i 4-146" DIA 3 ¢ \ 0 iq PLY« "13x18" Hoo AB a 8 orca 1 DIA AB.'s : i a a BEAM SPLICE DETAL (Sk-1) 8 3 2 PL 1"x10"'xt'-0"" PL tx10"x1'-9"" a “al — yr PL Je—- FACE OF x V 3h! PL CONCRETE ba 7 = FACE_OF 10 a" 4 -¥a" DIA xB8¥%6" HORIZ. SPACING eth e as : HORIZ. SPACING DETAIL (ay DETAIL (BN es \es Structural EngineeringFLUOR DANIEL Practice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 110¢196 Attachment 07 Page 6 of 21 SAMPLE DESIGN 2 : CONCRETE PIPERACK DESIGN use PL & STUDS FROM DETAIL 5/Sk-5 ie PL rR 2a" @ 3 o EFOR 1%" DS foes FoR Lor ryurnarron SBA LIFTING LUG DETAIL wore 4 DETAIL LIFTING ARRANGEMENT / DETAL asd SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE aonc CONTRACTOR yp 08 HOLE ce eee L ioe PEL DS ye W/TNUT Z ‘fe © one END © te THRE ND = _ : wz rs pare . aur 10.9 = x =P 3 ape craw 2 eo ve : oO o L Te on sor ml = i 4] ROD W/ THREADED oe & Dg ENDS & 2-NUTS & T WASHERS f& 1/1!" . zoso__| so wa oo ra0% Wei srw SECTION "C-C" (Sk-4) TAILING LUG DETAIL oe ‘Structural EngineeringPractice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 110196 Attachment 07 Page 7 of 21 FLUOR DANIEL, SAMPLE DESIGN 2: CONCRETE PIPERACK DESIGN —6-1/2" DIA ABs FOUNDATION PLAN 3 re TIE: | TO GROUT = EL, 107-0" +e +3 TES e x Tee SECTION “D-D' Structural EngineeringPractice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 110¢196 ‘Attachment 07 Page 8 of 21 FLUOR DANIEL SAMPLE DESIGN 2 : CONCRETE PIPERACK DESIGN ‘GIVEN References + ACH 318-95 AISC Steel Manual -ASD sth ed. + Piping Plans + Air Cooler Vendor Data Materials «Concrete : (¢ = 4000 PSI for P/R Bent, f, = 3000 PSI for Foundation, y. = 150 PCF + Reinforcing Steel :f, = 60 KSI + Steel :f,= 36KSI - Bolts : 3/4" > AS25N + Anchor Botts : A36 1 Soil: Allow Net Sol Bearing = 3KSF @ 5' Belowgrade. ( Allow 1/3 increase due to wind ) Ye= 120 PCF Water Table Depth = 6° Below Grade Design Loads Gravity + Structure : Include weight of Concrete and Steel members 1 Piping (Operating) : w = 0.04 x 20" = O.BKLF @ member 5- 6 0.56 in? O.K. Structural Engineering,670 215 1250 im Date 110€196 Attachment 07 Page 11 of 21 FLUOR DANIEL SAMPLE DESIGN 2 : CONCRETE PIPERACK DESIGN Beam Shear Design Case: Member 5 @ JT.3, Comb. :15, V, = 41.09%, @ d, Vy = 33.29" $e = 0.85 2) (4000 (24520) = 46,208 > 39.20" ; Use min, shear reinforcement. Sue = 21.5/2= 10.75", Use 10" By 5 2 59 2010) 2 OT 5059, 000 0.167 in’ Use #3 Stirrups @ 10° ofc over entire length of beam. Columns Design Case: member 2 @ JT.2, Comb. 13, Py = 64.53", V,= 23.33" , M, = 236.73"* A,REQD + Check Siendemess pEle 13993, 13333 sea 6 TIES gn = 1.0 (Fixed End) ‘30 ate, Keun 1801812 - 6455 _ keg, Ke = TEah) 648 22, also 64.8 < 100 ‘Therefore, consider siendemess 3600 (13333)/2.5) _ 9 609 000 Kein? T+1 peas ‘= (8,600,000) _ Gaxtextaye 2 D © 76453 Yu) 170.7627) de = 0 (No sustained lateral loads ) El, = 2 x El, = 2 x 9,600,000 = 19,200,000 K-in? Poe = 2627 = 1,254" =— 10: Be = Eg = 1.08 1264) Structural EngineeringPractice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 110ct96 ‘Attachment 07 Page 12 of 21 FLUOR DANIEL = SAMPLE DESIGN 2: CONCRETE PIPERACK DESIGN img = 8, Mgg + By Mgg = 1.17(10.89) + 4.08( 296,73 - 10.89 (0.9/1.4) = 12.7 + 248.1 = 260.8 20-4- 20 ee Pu, 45 “Me_ = 260.812) - 9.29 nero tae aoe From Interaction Charts: p REQ'D = 0.020 Ag REQ‘D 020 x 20? = 8.0in? A, PROVD = 12.0 in? Use 8- #9's with #3 ties @ 12" ole ‘Air Cooler Support Beam Des! Note: A more detailed analysis is necessary where ‘equipment support locations & loads are available, especially the location of beam splice points and the vertical deflection of beams. 50 (DL) + 5 (LL) + 4.5 (WL) = 59.5" , w, = 0.50 KLF M= 50.520) /4+0.5(20)'/8= 323 ive Use W24 x 104 Beam (May, = 435“) Braced Bay Longitudinal Force Note: Wind calculations not shown for brevity. See technical practice 670.215.1215 for procedures. P, = 18+4.4=224%,P, = 10.6" , F = 33% Friction (Use 10% of beam end shear for piping oper. load+30% anchor) P, = (19.23 x 0.4 + 0.3 x (3 x2) /2) x7 bays = 19.8 Py = (12x 0.1 +0.3x (3X2) /2) x7 bays = 14.7% Ee 198+ 14) 34.5 = Govems ‘Structural EngineeringPractice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 110¢t96 Attachment 07 Page 13 of 21 FLUOR DANIEL SAMPLE DESIGN 2 : CONCRETE PIPERACK DESIGN ‘Strut (Beam wt = 0.03 KLF ) we ans 0.87 KLF at Steere ces errerEeeEEEEC NS 20' M=067 (207/8=33.5", P= 22.4" 5 fia zzans+s3.s1s2-080<100K. ‘Use W10x33 Beam, (Phy = 95", Mana = 52** BA40%, (KL)y = (KL), = 18° Use 2L - §x3-1/2X5/16 (LLY) (Pro = 32%) Connecti Air Cooler Support Beam (AISC, ASD Part 4, Connectons ) + Splice : Vim; = 64.5" , # Bolts REQ'D = 64.5/9.3 = 7 (Bolts are in single shear ) p= 8452 eae For t2"PL,L REQD= StS; =@0" , L PROD = 20-172" (For 7 Bots) Weld: DREQD = a S45 = 4/6 th’s , Use 5/16" : BSOS : Use PL 1/2" x 6" x 20-1/2" with 7 - 3/4" A325N bolts on one beam & 5/16" Fillet weld on other beam. Provide Flange PL to develop 50% of the flange capacity. 12.75(0.75)24 #Bolts READ = BO = 12 bolts Use PL 9/4" x 13" x 21" with 24 bolts,, Typ. top and bottom Structural EngineeringPractice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 110196 Attachment 07 Page 14 of 21 FLUOR DANIEL a SAMPLE DESIGN 2 : CONCRETE PIPERACK DESIGN ‘Beam Seat Connection P=0.5x 20+ 50-4.5= 55.5% min P = 05x 20+50+5+4.5 = 69.5" max V=6+3.4= 9.4" (3.4* wind on beam) fe ele ee =Required bearing length for web yielding : N= (69.5 - 44.6) /11.9 =2.1" - small = Required bearing length for web crippling: . N= (69.5 -62.5) /4.24= 2.1" - small Beam seat O.X. in all cases. | Anchor Bolt Design tio = BAQNZ 55.5 2 oo 2a" 8 23° 26) 4 Note : Anchor bolt design not shown for brevity. See technical practice 670.215.1207 for procedures. ad Use 4-1" 4 Anchor Bolts Provide 1/2" Stiff PL @ Centerline of Bent to control shear stresses in web. Base Plate Desian Note: Base plate design will not be shawn for brevity. See technical practice 670.215.1208 for procedures. Note : The base plate must be mechanically connected to the reinforcing ‘steel in the concrete column, The most likely method is to weld rebar to the base plate as shown in PCI Design Handbook; however an altemate detail is shown here to avoid welding rebar. TN Use PL 1-1/2" x 28" x 28" with 6 - 1-1/2" anchor bolts. 1 Bear i yncrete Column Connections Note : For brevity, the design of these connections is omitted. The detalls shown were designed for the compression andior tension force component perpendicular to the face of the column in combination with the shear force parallel to the face of the column, using headed studs. For these types of connections, headed studs, rebar, embedded inserts, anchor bolts, or sleeved threaded rods can be used. For design procedures, see PC| Desian Handbook.” Aiso manufactures publications provide design procedures, capacities, and constraints. Structural EngineeringPractice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 110¢196 Attachment 07 Page 15 of 21 FLUOR DANIEL SAMPLE DESIGN 2 : CONCRETE PIPERACK DESIGN ‘Foundation Design (f= 3 KSI) Pier Design (Use 3! - 0" Square Pier , Say height is 4'- 6") @ Joint 2, load comb. 14, Py = 136.40, V,, = 25.49%, My = 253.14" = “72000 Vv. 1. = 2684 075, 0, = 442 A, REQD = 725314 = 4.74 in? /face ( x1.33= 2.27 in?/ face) 7423.5) ‘Ag MIN = 0.0033 x 36 x 33.5 = 3.98 i Hace AMIN COL. = 0,005 x 36* = 6.48 in? (Total ) Use 12-#7's with #8 ties @ 12" ole (A, PROVD = 120.6 = 7.2 in? (Total) (A,PROVD = 4x0.6= 24 in? / face ) Footing Design ‘Try 10-6" x 81-0" x 1-6" thick footing v Design Cases : Transverse Forces Applied @ top of pier. 3 Unfactored: 1. Joint, Load 9, P= 131.62" 0.208, M= 197.80" 2. Joint 2 , Load 7’, P= 79.16% , eae : 7.56" | M= 180.20" 10.5" x 8" x 1.5' Pier Weight = 3x3x4.5x0.15 = 6.1% Footing Weight =10.5x8x1.5x015= 189° Soll Welght = (10.5x8- 34) x35 x0.12=31,5* z= O65 P, = 131.6 + 56.5 = 188° M, = 197.8 + 20.2 x6= 319" @= 319/188 = 1.70 < B/S = 10,576 = 1.75 = 188(, , 8(1.70) SB = Pelt GS 4,41 KSF < 4.6 KSF allowable = P, = 79.16 + 56.5 = 136" M, = 180.2 + 17.56 x 6 = 286"* .33x345x012) OK, Structural EngineeringPractice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 110ct96 Attachment 07 Page 16 of 21 FLUOR DANIEL, =~ SAMPLE DESIGN 2 : CONCRETE PIPERACK DESIGN 0 = 286/136 = 2.1' > B/G 0.576 = 1.75 410.5) __) _ a foe) 3,60 KSF <4.6KSF O.K. Check Stability for Case 2 Py finwt Vy | Ma Mag = (90.08 + £65) 44.256 07.7 778" Tr Maw Mor = toads + 10.50%6 + 103.40 377" SR = 778/377 = 2.05>1.5 O.K Use 10-6" x 8' -0" x 1'-6" thick footing. Check Longitudinal Forces P, = 414.7 + 56.5 + 30.3 = 201.5%, Mp = 684" , SR= =, P, = 108-4 + 56.5 - 30.3 = 134.6, My, = 660", SR = 2.93, a7, Ban 258 KOF Ma, = 17.3 x64 30.3x4= 103.8 121.2=-17.4 M, 225" oat - Footing Reinforcing Steel Design Cases ~ Factored : 1 Joint 1, Load Comb. 15, Py= 142, V, = 25.5", My = 252"" Py, = 147 + 1.4.x0.75 x 56.5 = 206° My, = 252 + 25.5x6 = 405" e= 405/206 = 1.87 > BG 410.5) : SBanose = Bae 20 =m) eater = 2208) 95: Bez) * 9*8 w= @5x0.12+1.5x 0.15) x1.4 x 0.75 = 0.68 KSF = (2852378) «525 8B, = (2285328) x5.23= 3.24 KSF My @ face of pier = (3.24 - 0.68)(3.75)?/2+1.99.75)/3 = 27.3 "*/ft d= 18-35-1465" = 1214.5)? p= BOE = 0.210 ee K, = 27.30.21 = 130, a, = 4.37 Structural EngineeringPractice 670 215 1280 Publication Date 110c196 ‘Attachment 07 Page 17 of 21 FLUOR DANIEL SAMPLE DESIGN 2 : CONCRETE PIPERACK DESIGN 27.3 T3745) A, REQI 43 in? HH (x 1.33 = 0.57 in? / A) 3.75 Use #7's @ 12" cic EW-T&B Note: Top stee! required for negative bending due to uplit. : erect fa (718 inthe following equation is from the #7 Bars in the pier ) Leg = (4200 x (7/8) /5OBD ) x 0.7 x 2.27/24 = 12.69" ‘seo : Footing thicknes req'd = 12.69" + 2 x (7/8) +3 = 17.447< 18" O.K. Vy @ face of pier = (8.24 - 0.68)3.75 + 1.99 x 3.75/2 = 13.3" Ve = 0.85 x2X (TOT X12x14.5=16.2"> 133° OK. Punching shear is ©.. by inspection Use 1'-6" Footing Thickness Lifting Amangements /Luas We of concrete bent Wt. Cols. = 1,67? x 24 x 0.15 = 10.04" / each Wt. Bms. = 1.67 x 2 x 28.33 x 0.15 = 14.19*/ each Total weight = 2 (10.04 + 14.19) = 48.46" Determine ¢.G. Hem wr x ¥ wrx | wry 1 10.04 0 2 0 120.48 2 10.04 30 12 3012 | 120.48 3 14.19 6 47_| 2iz|s | 241.23 4 14.19 5 23 | 212.85 | 326.37 = 48.46 726.9 | 808.56 Structural Engineering‘Practice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 110ct96 ‘Attachment 07 Page 18 of 21 FLUOR DANIEL SAMPLE DESIGN 2: CONCRETE PIPERACK DESIGN = 778.90 = 45.00 = 808.56 i Re eae = 15.00 Y= Spae = 16:89 Locate Lifting Points ea 3 Use air cooler support beam seat connection for lifting points "A". Use y = 24- (24- 16.69) x2= 9.38 , say 9° 4-1/2" for ling points "B". Cheek Reinforcement for Bending in Horizontal Bent = Beam : Wy = 1.67X2x 0.15 x 1.7 = 0.85 KLF M, = 0.85 x30°/8 = 96" 96(12) Ce (0.9)7(60)16.5 = Column : Py = 12.78" Wi, = (1.87)? x 0.15 x 1.7 © 0.71 KLF My, = 0.71(8.38)' 2 = 31.23" 12,75 x ABGZLTED) + 0.74 x 14,62/2-31.29/14.62 = 21.58" R= 2x 12.75 + 0.71 x 24 - 21.58 = 20.96" V=0@x=7-0" Moun = 21.58 X 7 = 12.75 x6 - 0.74 x @F/2= 57.2"* 57.2(12) (©.9)*(60)17.5 A, REQD= = 0.81 in? < 3-#9'5 (A, = 3.00in?) O.K. ‘Connections @ jiting PT. “A” T= 48.46/2 x (1+ 25% impact) = 30.3* Use 25% impact per FD construction Teiseetale = 4.44 in? <2-#0's (A,=20in?) OK V, = 30.3 2= 15.2" Structural EngineeringFLUOR DANIEL Practice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 110ct96 Attachment 07 Page 19 of 21 SAMPLE DESIGN 2 : CONCRETE PIPERACK DESIGN T K V2=0 (Use Spreader Bar) XS ; 42” SQ PL CCheck Anchor Bolts (41% A307 bolts) Powe ficAc=0.95(6) (ADT 2X = es." = ovens P, = #bolts x A, xX Fy = 4 x (0.606) x (36) = 87.3" P./T = 65.8/30.3=22>1.7 O.K. fordirect tension Ve = 65.8 x 0.55 = 36.2 Wy=1.7x15.2= 25.8" < Ve OK. for shear only Ty = (36.2 25.8) /0.55 = 18.9" Cs ste = (Ty Vi) XB= (18.9/25.8) x8 = 5: Use e, = 5-1/2" Base Plate Mp = (80.3 x 8) /4= 60.6 ** t, REQD= 6" Structural EngineeringPractice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 110ct96 ‘Attachment 07 Page 20 of 21 FLUOR DANIEL SAMPLE DESIGN 2 : CONCRETE PIPERACK DESIGN Use 1-1/4" Base Plate 5.5" 41” Structural EngineeringPractice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 110ct96 Attachment 07 Page 21 of 21 FLUOR DANIEL SAMPLE DESIGN 2 : CONCRETE PIPERACK DESIGN Lug Plate and Pin ‘Use 1-1/4" Lug Plate Apnean = 393 = 187 iF Yo = 15.2 = 4,06 in? A, REQDD = $52 = 4.08 in Note : Tension is carried by plate on both sides of pin, shear is carried by one side only. Total A, REQD = 2x 1.06 = 2.12 in? e/ aoe 2c10) Pin is in double shear, Allowable shear stress for A307 material in bearing conn. is 10 KS! = Govems Pin Diameter Required, 157” Not Use 2" pin with min. A307 material. F,= 0.9 Fy = 0.9 x 96 = 32.4 KSI Bearing Area Required = Dt = 30.3/324= .94 in? DUPROVD = 2x 1.25 = .§ in? , No hole reinforcement required. Lug Plate width at centerline of hole = 2.125 + 2,12/1.25 = 3.82" ‘Use 3" radius to out side of lug plate. (width = 6", O.K.) Lug plate to Base plate weld i = For Tension { = 303 e DREQD = Zyiyg.5a8 2/76 ths Ve=9 (use Spreader ‘of Shear (eccentric load on weld ) x Ber) Ce paV=152%,Lett", K=0 a= (6.5 - 1.25) / 11 = A.C, =1.0 From table XIX , p4-75, AISC C= 0.939 Osea ee DREQD® seagar ant = 278 ths a Use 5/16" weld (min) 20" Structural EngineeringPractice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 110196 Attachment 08 Page 1 of 11 FLUOR DANIEL SAMPLE DESIGN 3 : CONCRETE PIPERACK DESIGN WITH SEISMIC DESIGN SIVEN + Referto SK-1 through SK -7 of sample design #2. The plan, elevation, sections, & details shown in ‘sample design #2 are acceptable for this design except as shown below. Note that the base plate detail in ‘sample design #2 is no longer required since a socket is used for this design. den. To.c. eh. 128-0 7.0.6. EL. 119'-0! 4 TIES © 8" PARTIAL ELEVATION/SECTION © TYPICAL BENT Structural EngineeringFLUOR DANIEL SAMPLE DESIGN 3 : CONGRETE PIPERACK DESIGN WITH SEISMIC DESIGN Practice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 110ct96 Attachment 08 Page 2 of 11 94 TES @ 12"—~ |_1 Ya" DIA PVC DRAN PIPE +6 TIES e 6" — 32-*5 VERTICALS — 4 TIES @ 6" — pe NOTE: ROUGHEN SIDES OF PRECAST COLUMN ON PART THAT WILL BE IN SOCKET PRIOR TO ERECTION. FILL 1" SPACE WITH GROUT \/4"x6"x0'~6" LEVELING PL HPFS EL 100'-0" T.0.C. EL 99'~ 27 @ 12" EW. Tes SECTION Structural EngineeringPractice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 10196 ‘Attachment 08 Page 3 of 11 FLUOR DANIEL ‘SAMPLE DESIGN 3 : CONCRETE PIPERACK DESIGN WITH SEISMIC DESIGN ‘Socket Grouting Notes 4. After erection of concrete bents , including plumbing, plug drain pipe and fill socket with water. Allow water to remain for 3 hours, 2, Unplug drain pipe , pump and blow out the water just prior to grouting. Leave concrete surfaces moist but not wet. 'Replug drain pipe. 3, __ Install temporary grout dams ( made of styrofoam or similar material ) on opposite faces of @ ‘column and pour grout ( sand cement or non-shrink - per job spec ) from side only until grout starts flowing out on the other side, indicating complete filling of the underside of the column. 4, Remove dams and continue filling spaces with grout. ‘Design Data ‘This sample design demonstrates concrete design using ACI - 318 - 89, Ch. 21 in a UBC seismic zone 4, It also includes the design of a socket foundation. References and materials from sample design #2 are used for this design. Design Loads + Use gravity loads from sample design #2. + Use wind loads from sample design #2 as earthquake loads, For calculations of actual earthquake loads, see technical practice 670.215.1216 for procedures. + Lead combinations are the same as sample design #2. Design Mode! ‘Same as sample design #2, BEQUIRED Detail/ Design concrete members and connections used in sample design #2 for seismic forces. SOLUTION Member Design Beams ‘The design performed in sample design #2 is valid except for the following requirements. © Pomme = 37.0% < Afg/0 = (20x18x410 = 1448" OK. Structural EngineeringPractice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 110ct96 Attachment 08 Page 4 of 11 FLUOR DANIEL pit SAMPLE DESIGN 3 : CONCRETE PIPERACK DESIGN WITH SEISMIC DESIGN + Clear span = 30- 1.67 = 28.33"> 4d=4x(18.5/12)=5.77 OK + bh=2048=111203 OK 1 pe20" 210°& s by + 2x84 XMq = 2042x0.75x18 =47" OK. = Longitudinal Reinforcement (Code minimum requires 2 bars continuous at top and bottom) eae “= 2 = 200(20)16 _ A, =4.00in? & AY, = 4.00in? 2 (200 BIH) ™ “Eog60 +p =0.0125 & p'=0.0125 < 0.025 OK. 2 At, =4.00in? > A/2 = 2.00in? O.K, O7int? OK. Use 4-#9'5 - Top & Bottom (A, PROVD = 4.0 in?) L,= 0.04 x 1.00% Song = 19" > 18" PROVD,, therefore hook bottom bars. {4000 - Transverse Reinforcement «Place stimups starting @ 2" from col. face with 5* spacing over 2 xh = 2x 24 = 48" , otherwise use 9” spacing. = Shear Strength “ Affe 120= (20x 24 x4) /20= 965 > Pinu =37* , therefore Ve = 0 ax Ast.25)fy 5 0.85 fb Mgr = Mya ® Ag X1.25 fy (d- al2) = 4x 1.25 x 60x 21.8 - 44/2) / 12= 483% se Moet + Mee 2(483) eerie Vee MELPBE Vu amay= Begg #1924 = 53.3 = MoS _ 53.34) 9 47 int AVREQD = YE = Soc gy 07 in A, PROVD =2x0.11 = 0.22 in? ( #3 stimup ) {Use #3 stirups placed as described above. Columns ‘The design made in sample design #2 is valid except for the following requirements. = Pyaar = 180.58" = Af, M0 = (20x20x4)/10= 160% Flexural strength is O.K. ae - ( 160.58" from member 1, JT.1, Load comb. 11) + p= 002>0018< 0.08 OK. Structural EngineeringPractice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 110¢196 Attachment 08 Page Sof 11 ‘FLUOR DANIEL SAMPLE DESIGN 3 : CONCRETE PIPERACK DESIGN WITH SEISMIC DESIGN + Bay #03 (8he fe op) XL (Ay Ma) = 1] 0.3 (4x 17.38% 4/60) x[ (400/(17" = 1] = 0.53 in? per ACI OF Ag = 0.09 She fe'/ fy = 0.08x4x 17.38 x 4/60 = 0.42 in? per ACI OF Ag =OAZShe fe'/ fy =0.12/ 0.09042 = 0.56 in? perUBC = For 3 bars, A's REQID = 0.56 in?/3= 0.19 in? / bar Ly = 20" = Govems at Top of column of Lo = 16.5(12)/6=33" <= —_ Govems at Bottom of column or ly = 18° Use #4 ties with #4 cross ties @ 4" c/ewithin Le region. Use 6* cic spacing outside of L, region. Beam / Column Joints ~ Beam Longitudinal Reinforcement ‘Top and Bottom Steel : 4 -#6's frdy__ 60000(8/8) 46 ge : t= Me = 164" < 185" OK es, 5/4000 + Transverse Reinforcement ‘Use #4 ties with #4 crass @ 4" spacing on column within joint Govems = Shear Strength = 12,/fg Au = 12/4000 205, = 304* >> Actual and factored shear across the joint. O.K. Socket Design Design Data ‘Column Size 2 20"x 20" ‘Column Reinforcement : 12- #9 verts. fe 3 3.0 KSI fe : 60.00 KSI FLL 17 SPACE ‘WITH GROUT Grout type; Non-shrink cement based grout between the socket and the column. Structural EngineeringPractice 670 215 1250 Publication Date 110ct96 Attachment 08 Page 6 of 11 FLUOR DANIEL ~ ‘SAMPLE DESIGN 3 : CONCRETE PIPERACK DESIGN WITH SEISMIC DESIGN Design Assumptions ‘Assume that column shear, V, and moment M, are resisted by the couple , R, acting on the forward and leeward socket walls. ‘Axtal load , P, transfers directly to the top of the footing. Therefore, ‘socket walls carry no axial load. Zero adhesion is assumed between the column and the socket walls, ‘since cement based grout may be used. Couple, R, is transfered to the end walls through horizontal bending of forward and leeward walls and through shear friction across assumed cracks, Socket Dimensions eu 4 ‘Socket wall thickness ¢) = 16.00 in. Secrest Provide depth of socket for development of #9 column reinforcing. os | For a #9 in tension, top bar, f.) = 4.0 KSI &e 420i. | Goa i AsREQD 42. an 4 bel AgPROVD ~ 1201.0) \ 4REQD= 42.00in | Hpp el. @ CL of PIR = 100,00 f _ Less: X-slope to CL of col. ort aaa Et ool T.O. Pvmt el. @ CL of col 9983 f Less : Slab Thickness = 05 f. BO. Slab el. = 99,338 d Less : Expansion joint mateial= 0.08 ft Faeece] T.O. Socket el. = 99.25% Less :4, REQ’ 3.501 B.O. concrete reinforcement el.= 95.75 ft Less : Concrete cover = oi7n r— el |e B.O. concrete col el. = Less : Grout and level PL thickness = Top of footing el. 7 | =x+d, Socket depth (L) = Structural Engineering,