This document is a summary order from the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal of David Mills's complaint. The three-judge panel reviewed Mills's appeal briefs and the arguments presented, finding that the district court correctly dismissed the case. Mills's arguments regarding the Rooker-Feldman doctrine and issue preclusion were based on a misunderstanding of these legal concepts and lacked merit. The panel summarily affirmed the district court's dismissal order for the reasons provided in that order.
Stanley v. Tucker v. William R. Moller, Edmund T. Curran, Regnier, Moller & Taylor, A Partnership, John Does, A, B, C, and D, 445 F.2d 1400, 2d Cir. (1971)
This document is a summary order from the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal of David Mills's complaint. The three-judge panel reviewed Mills's appeal briefs and the arguments presented, finding that the district court correctly dismissed the case. Mills's arguments regarding the Rooker-Feldman doctrine and issue preclusion were based on a misunderstanding of these legal concepts and lacked merit. The panel summarily affirmed the district court's dismissal order for the reasons provided in that order.
This document is a summary order from the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal of David Mills's complaint. The three-judge panel reviewed Mills's appeal briefs and the arguments presented, finding that the district court correctly dismissed the case. Mills's arguments regarding the Rooker-Feldman doctrine and issue preclusion were based on a misunderstanding of these legal concepts and lacked merit. The panel summarily affirmed the district court's dismissal order for the reasons provided in that order.
This document is a summary order from the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal of David Mills's complaint. The three-judge panel reviewed Mills's appeal briefs and the arguments presented, finding that the district court correctly dismissed the case. Mills's arguments regarding the Rooker-Feldman doctrine and issue preclusion were based on a misunderstanding of these legal concepts and lacked merit. The panel summarily affirmed the district court's dismissal order for the reasons provided in that order.
Stanley v. Tucker v. William R. Moller, Edmund T. Curran, Regnier, Moller & Taylor, A Partnership, John Does, A, B, C, and D, 445 F.2d 1400, 2d Cir. (1971)