Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Barber v. United States, 42 F.3d 1384, 1st Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views1 page
    Richard Barber appealed the denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 to vacate his sentence. The First Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's denial for the reasons given in the district court's Memorandum and Order dated July 12, 1994. The district court had denied Barber's motion to vacate his sentence.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1994-12-12 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 42 F.3d 1384 Docket: 94-1804

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Richard Barber appealed the denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 to vacate his sentence. The First Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's denial for the reasons given in the district court's Memorandum and Order dated July 12, 1994. The district court had denied Barber's motion to vacate his sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views1 page

    Barber v. United States, 42 F.3d 1384, 1st Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Richard Barber appealed the denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 to vacate his sentence. The First Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's denial for the reasons given in the district court's Memorandum and Order dated July 12, 1994. The district court had denied Barber's motion to vacate his sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    42 F.

    3d 1384

    NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states unpublished


    opinions may be cited only in related cases.
    Richard BARBER, Petitioner, Appellant,
    v.
    UNITED STATES of America, Respondent, Appellee.
    No. 94-1804

    United States Court of Appeals,


    First Circuit.
    Dec. 12, 1994

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Massachusetts [Hon. Frank H. Freedman, U.S. District Judge ]
    Richard I. Barber on brief pro se.
    Donald K. Stern, United States Attorney, and Kevin O'Regan, Assistant
    United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.
    D.Mass.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before SELYA, Circuit Judge, CAMPBELL, Senior Circuit Judge, and
    BOUDIN, Circuit Judge.
    Per Curiam.

    The denial of appellant's motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 is affirmed for
    essentially the reasons contained in the district court's Memorandum and Order
    dated July 12, 1994.

    You might also like