Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Rajkovic v. Market, Inc., 101 F.3d 106, 1st Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    13 views1 page
    Ljubica Rajkovic filed a pro se appeal of the district court's dismissal of her employment discrimination complaints against Laverde's Market, Inc. The First Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, agreeing that Rajkovic failed to allege sufficient facts to support her claims of employment discrimination. The court's per curiam opinion stated that it had reviewed the record and briefs and concurred with the district court's determination that dismissal of the complaints was proper.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-11-15 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 101 F.3d 106 Docket: 96-1593

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Ljubica Rajkovic filed a pro se appeal of the district court's dismissal of her employment discrimination complaints against Laverde's Market, Inc. The First Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, agreeing that Rajkovic failed to allege sufficient facts to support her claims of employment discrimination. The court's per curiam opinion stated that it had reviewed the record and briefs and concurred with the district court's determination that dismissal of the complaints was proper.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    13 views1 page

    Rajkovic v. Market, Inc., 101 F.3d 106, 1st Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Ljubica Rajkovic filed a pro se appeal of the district court's dismissal of her employment discrimination complaints against Laverde's Market, Inc. The First Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, agreeing that Rajkovic failed to allege sufficient facts to support her claims of employment discrimination. The court's per curiam opinion stated that it had reviewed the record and briefs and concurred with the district court's determination that dismissal of the complaints was proper.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    101 F.

    3d 106

    NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states unpublished


    opinions may be cited only in related cases.
    Ljubica RAJKOVIC, Plaintiff, Appellant,
    v.
    LAVERDE'S MARKET, INC., et al., Defendants, Appellees.
    No. 96-1593.

    United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.


    Nov. 14, 1996.

    Ljubica Rajkovic on brief pro se.


    John Foskett, Marnie J. Wortzman, and Deutsch Williams Brooks
    DeRensis Holland & Drachman, P.C. on brief for appellee Laverde's
    Market, Inc.
    Before TORRUELLA, Chief Judge, CYR and STAHL, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM.

    We have reviewed the record in this case, including the briefs of the parties and
    the memorandum of the district court. We agree with the district court that
    plaintiff/appellant has failed to allege sufficient facts to support her allegations
    that she suffered employment discrimination. Hence, her complaints were
    properly dismissed.

    Affirmed. See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1.

    You might also like