Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • IVP Pharmaceutical v. Tufts Associated, 298 F.3d 123, 1st Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views1 page
    The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling in favor of Tufts Associated Health Plans in a contract dispute case brought by IVP Pharmaceutical Care. In a per curiam opinion, the appeals court adopted the district court's opinion in full, finding that the district court correctly stated and applied Massachusetts contract law to the issues presented. The district court had written an extensive opinion that the appeals court saw no need to restate.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-08-12 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 298 F.3d 123 Docket: 01-2671

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling in favor of Tufts Associated Health Plans in a contract dispute case brought by IVP Pharmaceutical Care. In a per curiam opinion, the appeals court adopted the district court's opinion in full, finding that the district court correctly stated and applied Massachusetts contract law to the issues presented. The district court had written an extensive opinion that the appeals court saw no need to restate.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views1 page

    IVP Pharmaceutical v. Tufts Associated, 298 F.3d 123, 1st Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling in favor of Tufts Associated Health Plans in a contract dispute case brought by IVP Pharmaceutical Care. In a per curiam opinion, the appeals court adopted the district court's opinion in full, finding that the district court correctly stated and applied Massachusetts contract law to the issues presented. The district court had written an extensive opinion that the appeals court saw no need to restate.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    298 F.

    3d 123

    IVP PHARMACEUTICAL CARE, INC., Plaintiff, Appellant,


    v.
    TUFTS ASSOCIATED HEALTH PLANS, INC., Defendant,
    Appellee.
    No. 01-2671.

    United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.


    Heard April 2, 2002.
    Decided August 12, 2002.

    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE


    DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Morris E. Lasker,* U.S.
    District Judge]
    Geoffrey S. Harper, with whom Lawrence K. Kalodney, Fish &
    Richardson P.C. were on brief, for appellant.
    James J. Marcellino, with whom Greg A. Friedholm and McDermott, Will
    & Emery were on brief, for appellee.
    Before BOUDIN, Chief Judge, BOWNES, Senior Circuit Judge, and
    LIPEZ, Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM.

    We affirm. The district court has written a comprehensive extensive opinion


    which correctly states the relevant contract law of Massachusetts. There is no
    point in restating what the district court has already said clearly and correctly.
    We, therefore, adopt the district court opinion.

    Notes:
    *

    Of the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation

    You might also like