Professional Documents
Culture Documents
United States v. DuPont, 1st Cir. (1992)
United States v. DuPont, 1st Cir. (1992)
August 4, 1992
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
____________________
No. 92-1021
UNITED STATES,
Appellee,
v.
JULIAN DuPONT,
Defendant, Appellant.
____________________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
[Hon. Shane Devine, U.S. District Judge]
___________________
____________________
Before
Breyer, Chief Judge,
___________
Campbell, Senior Circuit Judge,
____________________
and Cyr, Circuit Judge.
_____________
____________________
Per Curiam.
___________
On
the record
as developed
in the
the notice
appellant
of
the
sent
was reasonably
forfeiture
constitutionally adequate.
See
___
calculated to
proceeding
apprise
party of action,
hence
and
notify
was
v.
(service, sent
reasonably calculated to
not required to
actual knowledge
not raise
this argument
below, however,
assert
change of
address
and hence
the government
knew
of
can not
-- the government's
without notice
1989
Appellant did
failure to
-- do not
as
1989 PSR's
show that in
appellant's change
of
address.
Appellant's
motion for
denied.
Affirmed.
________
-2-
appointment of
counsel is